So - our fisherman - he isn't seeing success. His answer to his problem is to make things as difficult for the French as he believes they are making it for us. He tells us there were no problems before Brexit. You can see his logic.
We do not currently carry out customs checks on goods from the EU. What does he think of that; is he aware of it? Why does he think our government are not doing that? If stopping imports from the EU is good, the government would surely be on it to back up their rhetoric. They are doing all they can to let them through. Our fisherman and many other leave voters think the massive reduction in imports from the EU caused by rising tariffs would be a good thing. But is it?
We were so unprepared. Johnson will not tell that fisherman that we are so desperate for those imports of food it cannot apply tariffs on them. We are allowing imports without tariff or check because the food shortages we are already experiencing would become massively worse if we didn't. If we could organise tariffs - and we can't while we are in a position where we don't have the staff, the facilities or the systems to manage imports - it wouldn't just be higher prices; there would be real shortages.
The government knows we cannot make it difficult for the EU to export goods to us. We are desperate for those goods, especially food and medicines and many other essentials.
If a tariff could be applied, we, the people, would be the ones who paid increased prices, not the EU. We can't get these things from anywhere else - no one organised that either. The already rising costs of imports from the EU are currently adding to our inflation. A tariff such as our fisherman suggests would hit the pockets of those on the lowest income most. With such tariffs, starvation would be in the offing for the very poorest.
The ex leave voter seems to have misunderstood that the economic power lies not with us but with the EU. We have the "power" to choose to starve. But honestly - is that what we expected?