Hard hat day and hiding behind the sofa for me.
I'm think less well of the queen for the way in which she has allowed this to be handled. Prince A couldn't retain his military roles, certainly, but he should have been allowed to resign from them himself, not 'be stripped of them', and she could have ensured that this was how it was put.
His behaviour was seedy and sordid and he has fallen into the hands of a gold-digger. The terminology of assault is legally correct we are told, but its use in in general conversation in the case of an older teenager with an apparently complicit father puts a gloss on it that seems excessive, as does 'trafficked'. I gather that one of the cited occasions was in London, where 17 is not under age.
Prince A has never been popular and probably not deserved to be. But it is possible to stand by the accuser while not condoning the crime, and I wish the queen had not allowed herself to be drawn into it, and I wish his daughters had spoken up for his better qualities. By all accounts he has been a good father.