Taking away Harry's security sounds like a vindictive move from another member of the Royal family in my opinion
No, it was a decision by the MET police based on the rules for providing public money funded security for Royalty. And not letting him pay is because of rules around not being able to "buy" publicly funded security provided by the Police! The Police are not for sale!!
The Royal Family were not involved in the decision, as the MET security decisions making takes precedence over individual preference. That is why Andrew was evidently a night mare to protect because he was so bloody minded about it, and expected security officers to obey orders rather than defer to their superior security knowledge. It is why Diana used to try to sneak out without security because they wouldn't always follow her wishes. It is also why many working Royals only get security when they are on Royal Duty ...and Harry and Family are no longer working Royals!!
How did you vote and why today
Giving Lifts - the car variety!



