Rosiehaha
If it is a political move surely not lifting restrictions would have been more appeasing to the ‘frightened’. Secondly all I have heard is listen to the scientists and they are saying this is the right move. They will be watching the variants and hopefully will act accordingly. This virus is never going away and we can’t keep living in this way. All we can do is take responsibility for our own actions and those who don’t never have.
Why would Johnson want to appease the frightened? The clinically vulnerable - who may or may not be frightened are largely composed of the elderly and those with underlying health problems. They are a minority - Johnson is not interested in appeasing them.
This is a political move to appease his backbenchers, the libertarians - many of whom would, given the choice, never have instituted lockdown in the first instance. And the general public who have construed this public health issue as an attack on their personal 'freedum'.
Learning to 'live with the virus' is Boris Johnson's way of regaining his popularity. And if the infection rates rise, it's our own fault because he's given us 'personal responsibility' which we've obviously abused. Easy peasy - he 'got Covid done'.
We could have started a more cautious, measured and inclusive approach back to normality, with a gradual easing of restrictions. Just because Johnson says it's over, doesn't mean it is.
As the writer Tom Peck says, "no one knows if it's OK to end Covid isolation - least of all the PM."
... and your obvious contempt for the frightened is the reason why I, and many like me, will continue to take sensible precautions, regardless of Johnson's announcement - not because we are living in fear but because we don't want to become one of the inconvenient 'numbers' on a list of those who've succumbed to the virus. That's if we ever even know those statistics.