Seriously, I think that anyone who reads the threads in question will be able to make up their own minds as to the source of any insults, any twisting of words and any animosity.
There is no orchestrated silencing, deliberate or otherwise - there is disagreement that 'gender' should take precedence over sex, and that biology can be thwarted so that simply saying 'I am a woman/man' will make someone change into the opposite sex from the one into which they were born.
Many of those who believe that biological sex should not take second place to 'gender' declarations also believe that woman should have safe places where male-bodied people are not allowed - such as prison cells, hospital wards, rape suites, domestic violence refuges and so on, and when we post about these beliefs we are called 'transphobic' and worse, in what could be described as an orchestrated attempt to silence us.
This does not mean that we think that ‘trans = sex-offender’ - not at all. It means that sex-offenders can pose as trans and gain access to victims that way. It also removes the right of women from certain religions and cultures to access those spaces, and removes informed consent from all of us.
Anyway, this thread has clearly been timed to start at the beginning of the weekend, when HQ are maybe less likely to see it, and yes, MissA, I think you are right that it will get heated.
Other than the obvious - creating more animosity - I'm not sure what it will achieve, as there are at least three other 'live' threads on the subject, but I suppose it will give more people the chance to observe the dynamics of these threads and judge for themselves.