I mentioned this previously, as an aside, on the thread about Sunak's comment on Brexit.
However, his answer to the HoC Committee after the Spring Statement keeps going around my mind. I cannot see how it works either morally or economically.
Some of you voted Conservative; some intend to vote Conservative next time. Could you please explain the thinking behind his explanation to the Committee?
What he said was that as he did not want to borrow more, he decided to target support at the working population rather than channelling money to the poorest through the benefits system.
Can someone tell me why they think this is a good thing, economically and morally? It would help if I understood the thinking behind this decision.