Gransnet forums

News & politics

Scottish survey on gender recognition bill update

(231 Posts)
Elegran Tue 24-May-22 08:21:09

www.holyrood.com/news/view,gender-recognition-over-half-of-survey-respondents-oppose-changes

"A survey – which generated 10,800 individual responses – found 59 per cent of people opposed the bill, while 38 per cent supported it.

More than 60 per cent of respondents felt the government should not remove the requirement for a medical diagnosis to obtain a gender recognition certificate, though around a third supported such a move.

Similarly, just over 60 per cent of people felt the period a person must live in their acquired gender should not be reduced from two years to three months, while almost 40 per cent supported the change.

Among those opposed to the bill, respondents were concerned that “predatory males” would use reforms to the system to “gain access” to women’s spaces, including prisons, hospitals and refuges.

They also feared the “erosion of women’s rights” and “unintended consequences”.

However, those in favour of the bill said it would provide trans people with the “rights they deserve”, and stated that simplifying the process would make it "more straight forward" and less “intrusive” and “traumatic”.

Some of the people who support the legislation called for it to go further, with suggestions ranging from the legal recognition of non-binary people (those who identify as neither male nor female) or allowing under 16s to obtain a gender recognition certification if they have parental consent.

The equalities committee will consider these survey responses, as well as over 800 longer written submissions, as it takes evidence from stakeholders over the coming months.

The legislation is broadly expected to pass as a majority of MSPs have expressed support for the reforms."

Galaxy Wed 25-May-22 09:38:31

The fact that you cant change sex is I am afraid the debate at its core. Whether you like it or not. We have as a society decided to pretend that human beings can change sex. It was a bad idea and an idea that pretty much no one believes. Some people think it's kind to do this. I dont because there is always a limit for most people where it just isnt true. For some its sport, for some its prisons and for some its relationships. Even those who shout it the loudest dont actually believe it when push comes to shove.

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 09:40:32

Sweden has cut backon its provision of hormone treatment to young people.

segm.org/Swedish_pediatric_gender_clinics_adopt_cautious_stance

volver Wed 25-May-22 09:40:59

The fact that you cant change sex is I am afraid the debate at its core.

Is that what the Bills about? Or is the Bill about self ID?

Because to the casual observer all this shouting about changing sex and keeping women safe just looks like hysteria. Sorry to say that, but it does. Is there no nuance?

TerriBull Wed 25-May-22 09:43:44

I'm not sure how the expression "I feel sorry for the women of Scotland" in THIS context can make any woman of Scotland touchy, that's not said in a way of "we'll come to your aid, because you can't fight your own battles", but more out of solidarity for women who could or may be badly affected by having their safe spaces removed. Those who expressed such sentiments I imagine would also be looking on to see how all this pans out from the point of view of it being adopted in England and Wales too. Does it make us patronising to say we feel sorry for example, for the women of Afghanistan or more lately the women of Ukraine, when we feel aghast and horrified at what they are having inflicted on them as our fellow female human beings. My own thoughts are surely when women are put into negative situations, don't we sympathise with each other regardless of borders? I'd call that empathy rather than patronising.

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 09:45:04

Transwoman Debbie Hayton explains problems in Ireland's use of self-id of sex.

unherd.com/2021/07/how-the-trans-activists-fooled-ireland/

volver Wed 25-May-22 09:53:26

TerriBull

I'm not sure how the expression "I feel sorry for the women of Scotland" in THIS context can make any woman of Scotland touchy, that's not said in a way of "we'll come to your aid, because you can't fight your own battles", but more out of solidarity for women who could or may be badly affected by having their safe spaces removed. Those who expressed such sentiments I imagine would also be looking on to see how all this pans out from the point of view of it being adopted in England and Wales too. Does it make us patronising to say we feel sorry for example, for the women of Afghanistan or more lately the women of Ukraine, when we feel aghast and horrified at what they are having inflicted on them as our fellow female human beings. My own thoughts are surely when women are put into negative situations, don't we sympathise with each other regardless of borders? I'd call that empathy rather than patronising.

Well I'm feeling patronised.

Maybe its just me.

And comparing the situation of women in Afghanistan or Ukraine with those in Scotland is unacceptable.

volver Wed 25-May-22 09:54:13

FarNorth

Transwoman Debbie Hayton explains problems in Ireland's use of self-id of sex.

unherd.com/2021/07/how-the-trans-activists-fooled-ireland/

I thought it was self id of gender? Or does it make it more scary if we use the word sex?

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 10:01:28

That is an excellent response to the ScotGov consultation .

This tiny excerpt gives an idea of it, for those without the time to read it.

"I am considering undertaking an artistic project which will involve me applying for a gender recognition certificate. When 'living as the acquired gender' has such trivial requirements, and the 'acquired gender' has only a circular definition, my art will aim to explore these ideas in an uncompromising and confronting way."

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 10:03:09

That was about the response posted by grannydarkhair.

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 10:08:07

volver You must be aware that self-id of 'gender' can be used to have the sex signifier changed on birth certificates and that self-identification of 'gender' is to be regarded as a definition of a person's sex, at all times.
So it is indeed self-id of sex.

If you see it differently, please explain.

volver Wed 25-May-22 10:09:23

FarNorth

That is an excellent response to the ScotGov consultation .

This tiny excerpt gives an idea of it, for those without the time to read it.

^"I am considering undertaking an artistic project which will involve me applying for a gender recognition certificate. When 'living as the acquired gender' has such trivial requirements, and the 'acquired gender' has only a circular definition, my art will aim to explore these ideas in an uncompromising and confronting way."^

That's not excellent.

Its childish and silly in the face of such an important discussion.

And yes, I read it.

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 10:10:29

And what comment have you about what Debbie Hayton wrote, volver?

volver Wed 25-May-22 10:12:22

FarNorth

volver You must be aware that self-id of 'gender' can be used to have the sex signifier changed on birth certificates and that self-identification of 'gender' is to be regarded as a definition of a person's sex, at all times.
So it is indeed self-id of sex.

If you see it differently, please explain.

I can't explain because the whole thing is hidden in a fog of disinformation and preconception. I'll go and read up about it. If I can find anything unbiassed, which is highly unlikely.

Current piece of confusion: I've been told many times on here that gender isn't the same as sex. Now, apparently it is. Is it any wonder folk are confused?

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 10:15:28

GNers who know the difference between gender and sex are not the ones making the law.
ScotGov are making the law and are treating the two things as being the same.

Aveline Wed 25-May-22 10:16:02

As a scientist volver you must be concerned at the potential repercussions for women's health needs? Female bodies are different from male ones at the most basic level. Research into diagnoses, therapies and treatments based on a sample that it not entirely female is surely seriously compromised. If this bill is passed how can researchers realistically exclude those that simply feel they're women rather than actually being women. They can demand legally to be included.

FarNorth Wed 25-May-22 10:18:55

A further quote from that response to ScotGov, posted by grannydarkhair.

Sadly, there are many examples of males using self ID to facilitate abuse of women and girls (including in Scotland- see Katie Dolatowski) but this seems to leave proponents of self ID unmoved. For example, in her statement introducing this Bill Shona Robison said that there is no evidence that men have had to pretend to be anything in order to abuse.

No, they don’t have to pretend, there is ample evidence that men will in fact undertake significant effort to actually become members of society in positions of trust and with access to victims in order to increase their opportunity to offend, such as scouts leaders, priests, taxi drivers, teachers, etc. This Bill opens the opportunity for them to now become women.

Men that wish to use this law to facilitate the abuse of women won’t be writing to you like I am, telling you how they plan to use this law in a way that has not been intended.

Smileless2012 Wed 25-May-22 10:22:08

FarNorth

GNers who know the difference between gender and sex are not the ones making the law.
ScotGov are making the law and are treating the two things as being the same.

That's it in a nut shell FarNorthsmile.

TerriBull Wed 25-May-22 10:34:43

Volver I'm sorry you feel patronised, I'm sure that is not the intention of any poster here. I wasn't seeking to make an analogy between the suffering of the women of Afghanistan, Ukraine and the subject up for discussion and how it affects the women of Scotland, but merely to say when any woman/girl suffers at the hands of the patriarchy then for me it doesn't matter where the victim emanates from, I empathise with her situation as another woman.

I don't often contribute to these threads I think there are a lot of excellent posters, Doodledog, Smileless, Chewbacca, FarNorth, Iam64 and may more who saliently put forward a point of view I'm always in agreement with.

Gender recognition and the access to a women's safe space by male bodied persons is a huge issue for women, some may say it's a lot of fuss about nothing. I go swimming possibly 3 times a week so it focuses my mind when I'm getting dressed and undressed as to how and I imagine the other women there would feel if a male bodied person were to be able to access our designated female only area, and no I don't expect that to happen any time soon, but there is a possibility that could be a reality sometime down the line. It was indeed a reality for those who competed against Lia Thomas who felt very uncomfortable when Lia Thomas didn't take measures to hide their male genitalia around those women. I also look at this through the prism of my 12 year old granddaughter's eyes rather than my own, because I know her generation will be far more affected by any changes in legislation surrounding all of this. I know from taking her swimming with me, she automatically makes for a curtained off cubicle, self consciously private, she has expressed that she certainly wouldn't want to share a changing room with a male bodied person. It's not really about the sharing of toilets, I've been to many of late where those are a floor to ceiling cubicles that can be accessed by male or female, not a problem, it's so much more than that, it's about feeling and being vulnerable, not feeling safe. Magnified by thousands if you had been someone who had suffered sexual assault or rape. All of us here no doubt read about the woman on a hospital ward who was raped and then that was refuted, it could have happened on a women only ward! later it was revealed that ward also accommodated at the time of the assault a male bodied transwoman. . This to my knowledge has only happened once, but that is once too often and potentially there will be other scenarios where girls and women could be put into dangerous situations, so yes from that point of view, bearing mind Scotland is further down the road with the whole gender recognition issue, it is of interest to as fellow women.

Chewbacca Wed 25-May-22 10:34:45

www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://twitter.com/murdo_fraser/status/1435673691967340545%3Flang%3Den-GB&ved=2ahUKEwim_9aVqvr3AhWRXsAKHdVjDFMQwqsBegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2nMS56FtDEsXWn3tCLtoNu

This is the link to Twitter where Sturgeon shouts "Shame on you" at Murdo Fraser. He says she shouted. volver says she heckled. Either way it's semantics; Sturgeon's stance on women's rights in Scotland is abundantly clear: they're not as important as those of trans activists.

ps: I'm not hiding the thread; I'm going out for the day. smile

volver Wed 25-May-22 10:38:03

Actually he said she "started screaming".

I guess we can all decide for ourselves who is the misogynist in that exchange.

TerriBull Wed 25-May-22 10:38:30

could couldn't

volver Wed 25-May-22 10:43:02

FarNorth

Transwoman Debbie Hayton explains problems in Ireland's use of self-id of sex.

unherd.com/2021/07/how-the-trans-activists-fooled-ireland/

As far as I can see this issues she discusses are to do with protecting gender- (or sex? who knows...) specific services and spaces? Which as I said above is something that has to be addressed.

Nothing there about giving children drugs or medical interventions, which we stray into on GN with alarming alacrity.

Galaxy Wed 25-May-22 10:43:25

Yes the conflation of sex and gender has caused massive problems. I can only say the difference as I see it. Sex is biological reality, gender for me are ideas imposed by society on how both sexes present.

Galaxy Wed 25-May-22 10:44:27

I dont really see how you can segregate services by gender. Unless you are reducing people to a range of stereotypes.

volver Wed 25-May-22 10:47:26

Like this you mean?

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10833067/Woman-22-barred-ladies-toilets-M-S-staff-mistook-man.html