I find this a fascinating if not an unanswerable conundrum.
What to many is indisputable fact, appears to be overlooked by others and a complete falsehood believed.
Look at the example of Trump and the way millions apparently are convinced that the election was “stolen” that fraud was committed and in fact Trump won.
Zero evidence has been forthcoming and yet nothing will convince these people otherwise.
Similarly over partygate, or corruption or other evidence based issues committed by Johnson. Yet it is clear from many posters just on GN, that they will never believe what is staring them in the face.
Why?
One reason may be that because we have invested so much emotional or psychological importance in that person, like Johnson, that we find it too painful to suddenly realise that someone we trust and believe in has in fact been lying and cannot now be trusted. All the more so if we have invested our votes in issues that are proving to be on very rocky ground indeed.
So denying reality may be the way we protect ourselves from the pain of realising that our judgement may be skewed.
The problem is that is alright as far as it goes, but refusing to accept what is clearly true, means that the problems will continue to stack up without being tackled as they should be however painful it is to admit we were wrong.
So sad I’ve nearly finished last Jilly Cooper
Complete unknown - Timothee Chalamet as Bob Dylan
How did you vote and why today
