Gransnet forums

News & politics

Assisted Dying Bill - Scotland

(58 Posts)
FarNorth Sat 20-Aug-22 20:25:00

This is a video from Dignity in Dying Scotland on the Assisted Dying Bill which it is hoped will be brought to Parliament in early 2023.

It includes 2 very moving talks from people whose loved ones did not have the control they wanted, at the end of their lives.

The Bill will apply only to those who are terminally ill and are of sound mind.

youtu.be/nO8w9Ju6j_M

It is only about 30 mins as it starts about 15 mins in and finishes at about 45 mins, due to zoom problems.

Barmeyoldbat Wed 24-Aug-22 12:21:21

Thanks for the link and info, will look at it with interest.

Caleo Wed 24-Aug-22 12:25:58

Everyone dies . It's terrible that we do not have the right to dying with dignity when, where, and how we choose.

Kim19 Wed 24-Aug-22 12:42:43

Very thought provoking and informative. Thank you FN.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-Aug-22 12:56:59

I agree Caleo. Of course we do have that right if we are able to take matters into our own hands, but cannot ask for help. High time things changed.

Smileless2012 Wed 24-Aug-22 13:14:25

I agree that it's time things changed but fear they never will. People go to Dignitas and shorten what little time they have left so they can die with dignity.

Shinamae Wed 24-Aug-22 13:15:19

Bring it on..

kgnw28225 Wed 24-Aug-22 13:27:33

I have reservations about this bill. Anything to do with ending a life, is brought in with triple lock wording and rules and regulations. It takes about twenty years for a bill to be corroded. Abortion when first brought in, came with rules and restrictions. IE it could only be performed by a doctor in a hospital, etc,etc. Now 20 years later, you can get tablets, go home and do a diy abortion. If this bill is brought in, it will be today’s 50+ years, in 20 years time. Will families be able to get some tablets and do a diy euthanasia on a relative, who they think has ‘no quality of life, through maybe dementia, bad arthritis etc, etc. Be careful what you wish for.

FarNorth Wed 24-Aug-22 13:37:34

Germanshepherdsmum

I agree Caleo. Of course we do have that right if we are able to take matters into our own hands, but cannot ask for help. High time things changed.

Taking matters into our own hands is full of possible problems.
As well as the problem of having to be physically able to carry out the action without help, for fear that a helper would face criminal charges, there's the possibility of increased suffering if the attempt fails.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-Aug-22 13:40:22

Most definitely.

Farzanah Wed 24-Aug-22 14:33:29

Humanist UK have supported Assisted Dying for ages and have frequently lobbied MPs and Peers. Even managed to get the support of our local MP who was against AD until a visit to a MND sufferer was arranged.

AGAA4 Wed 24-Aug-22 14:46:43

This should be available to anyone of sound mind who wants to end their own life.

There would need to be safeguards in place so that greedy or overwrought relatives can't make this happen against someone's wishes.

Blondiescot Wed 24-Aug-22 14:48:28

I've long been in favour of this, especially after watching my mother die a long slow death from Alzheimer's. The final act of kindness we can do for beloved pets is to put them out of their misery if they are suffering, so why can't we, as humans, choose to do the same? Being able to die with dignity should be a basic human right.

Doodledog Wed 24-Aug-22 14:51:53

I couldn't agree more, Blondiescot.

Zonne Wed 24-Aug-22 14:59:53

I was involved in the very early consultations for this. For me, it’s a matter of equality as well as dignity. My husband has a life-limiting illness, which will leave him with a very poor quality of life, and the kind of death one wouldn’t wish on any living creature. We are fortunate, and have money put by for Switzerland, but it is so so wrong that others have to suffer miserable deaths because they don’t have the same resources (and for other reasons of course)

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-Aug-22 15:01:00

And it’s so wrong that people have to travel to Switzerland.

kjmpde Wed 24-Aug-22 15:02:12

my mother swore she would never end up in a care home. unfortunately she had a stroke and became a vegetable. she never spoke a word nor did she smile or manage her bladder and bowel. she was bed bound for several years and trapped in one room. Even prisoners that commit murder get time out of their cell. if euthanasia was legal, she could have nodded in agreement. I was not brave enough to kill her - there was no monetary gain to the family as she did not own property. I know she never forgave me for her cruel existence. only those that have never had to see their relatives suffer are those that think they should not be able to decide. I hate - yes I do mean hate- those that think life is worth enduring at all costs. People should have the right to choose

Doodledog Wed 24-Aug-22 15:04:10

I'm so sorry to hear that, kjmpde, and also for your husband, Zonne. It must be very difficult for both of you.

Germanshepherdsmum Wed 24-Aug-22 15:10:36

I echo what Doodledog says. ??

AGAA4 Wed 24-Aug-22 15:10:53

I saw my DH endure incredible pain for 18 months before he died so I do know how distressing this is for their loved ones.

Grammaretto Wed 24-Aug-22 15:15:36

I agree totally kjmpde and Zonne.
We were lucky that when DH was dying he was at home being kept comfortable with morphine at the end with the help of our sensitive local medical team. That part only lasted a couple of weeks.
I would prefer for myself to be in control if I couldn't bear to continue with life

Farzanah Wed 24-Aug-22 15:16:50

My mother too kjmpde and I feel so sorry for others in similar situations.
Around 1 person a week travels to Switzerland to end their life (2019 figures) may be more now, and they have to find £10.000 +to do so, with the risk of relatives accompanying being prosecuted.
I completely agree Zonne equality and dignity, with good safeguards in place.

Glorianny Wed 24-Aug-22 15:18:34

kgnw28225

I have reservations about this bill. Anything to do with ending a life, is brought in with triple lock wording and rules and regulations. It takes about twenty years for a bill to be corroded. Abortion when first brought in, came with rules and restrictions. IE it could only be performed by a doctor in a hospital, etc,etc. Now 20 years later, you can get tablets, go home and do a diy abortion. If this bill is brought in, it will be today’s 50+ years, in 20 years time. Will families be able to get some tablets and do a diy euthanasia on a relative, who they think has ‘no quality of life, through maybe dementia, bad arthritis etc, etc. Be careful what you wish for.

This comparison doesn't add up. A woman is entitled to the least intrusive method of abortion available to her. The law remains as it always was. The method is much more humane.

As far as dying with dignity goes the medical aspect will always be legally set and will provide safeguards.

Blondiescot Wed 24-Aug-22 16:56:23

Absolutely, Glorianny. There is no comparison.

Farzanah Wed 24-Aug-22 17:09:07

I actually don’t think the Abortion Bill has been corroded at all. There are safeguards around taking abortifacient pills at home and also the morning after pill and I think it gives women more freedom and more autonomy. Particularly those who may be in coercive relationships or may find it difficult to access clinics.
Anyway as Glorianny says no comparison to Assisted Dying Bill, and I don’t want to derail the thread.