King Charles III

Perhaps they have better control over their bladders than you ReadyMeals.

The King and Queen must be wearing Depends or something. They get whisked from reception to church service to reception with the cameras on them all the way and never get a comfort break. I have to go at least three times just while watching.

I think everyone, including the Royals, might be able to find it in their hearts to forgive Meghan her stupid comments - the legalities of the wedding, the complexities of the children's titles, the passport confiscation etc. What is harder to forgive is the deliberate upset and hurt she caused Catherine which has obviously brought about the huge rift between Harry and William.

I did some googling before I got my running shoes on...

It was thought the ceremony could not have been legal because it lacked witnesses and a registered venue, and was likely to have been an informal exchange of vows.

In an interview with la Repubblica, Mr Welby was asked about what happened and he said the legal wedding was on the Saturday, adding: " But I won't say what happened at any other meetings. "

In Scotland you used to be able to say you were married by just saying we're married. No churches, paperwork or clergy. Good thing, if you ask me.

Or, she could be a pathological liar intent on bringing down the British establishment including the CoE.

news.sky.com/story/meghan-and-harry-did-not-have-secret-backyard-wedding-before-the-public-ceremony-says-archbishop-of-canterbury-12261349#:~:text=The%20Archbishop%20of%20Canterbury%20has,Welby%20in%20their%20%22backyard%22.

I’d rather watch that Volver!???

I'd rather run naked through the streets of Edinburgh

And the video...?

Watch the Oprah interview, volver

volver

^When people can twist words in this way to suit their own agenda then it is hard to believe them at all.^

Oh, you're quite right there.

Oh you’re so right there.???

Anniebach

A situation where the facts are known for sure

And the video...?

A situation where the facts are known for sure

Does anyone have a link to a video of what she actually said please, rather than a third hand interpretation?

The Archbishop of Canterbury had to publicly deny that the earlier marriage alleged by Megan had taken place. She had put him in an invidious position with that particular lie.

Fact - a marriage has to be registered, a marriage cannot be
registered twice , a birth can be registered twice

Let us reserve judgement about things we cannot know. Accusing someone of lying should be reserved for situations where all the facts are known for sure.

It has been clear that more than one person has found joining the royal family to be very challenging. How they choose to deal with that will depend on their life experiences. I am sure we would all find it hard.

https://www.gransnet.com/uploads/talk/202209/medium-713878-img-3068.png https://www.gransnet.com/uploads/talk/202209/medium-484851-img-3069.png

Made my laugh

Megan lied

You’ve only got to go on a thread like this and see how every poster views situations according to their own previous experience, knowledge base and values to realise that it is absolutely true that recollections vary. It’s not a black and white one is right, one is wrong situation - it virtually never is.

oh yes indeed Volver

When people can twist words in this way to suit their own agenda then it is hard to believe them at all.

Oh, you're quite right there.

unfortunately, Meghan had already told a few questionable, stories by this time, so difficult to give her and Harry the benefit of the doubt.
during the Oprah interview she claimed that she couldn't get any help with her mental health problems, so very very unlikely.Also that she and Harry had really had their wedding
'in the back yard of Buckingham Palace' ahead of the wedding day.She made this highly misleading story appear to have been a real wedding to the US viewers.
When people can twist words in this way to suit their own agenda then it is hard to believe them at all.

The Queen seems to have had an excellent memory l

Or alternatively, that the late Queen had completely mis-remembered what was said and done, and underestimated what it meant to Meghan.

That's possible too, isn't it?

You make a very good point there and people will believe what they want to believe is possible.

Prentice

the recollections may vary statement very cleverly didn't state that lies had been told but neatly summed up what the royal family and many people too I dare say thought of Harry and Meghan and their victimhood status.

Or alternatively, that the late Queen had completely mis-remembered what was said and done, and underestimated what it meant to Meghan.

That's possible too, isn't it?

volver

I promised somebody on this site earlier this week that I wouldn't use the word paranoia as an insult, so I won't.

??????????

merlotgran

Camilla will probably be kicking off her shoes, pouring a large G&T and curling up on the sofa with her dogs!

She'll also be able to see her own family in private.

I think she and Charles deserve a feet up situation and a glass or two now.