It’s not quite as simplistic as that.
I totally agree we should have more medical training places as a whole, not just doctors.
But in countries where all medicine is private and there is nothing even vaguely like the NHS there is a surplus of doctors.
That doesn’t mean there aren’t people who need a doctor in those countries. It means the medical profession is viewed very differently. Families pay for a member of the family to receive training so that they will in turn support the family. So they only work where they can earn good money. If that is overseas then that is where they will take posts.
But if no overseas posts were available it would not increase medical care in their own country because there are more doctors than there are people who can pay for medical care.
It may seem an alien concept to us in a country where doctors are employed by the state and medical care is available throughout the country but that’s not how it operates in many other countries. Doctors, apart from a few committed humanitarians, live in cities where there are people who can pay for their services. Poorer country areas have no doctors because they cannot pay. A doctor will stay in the city treating the occasional case and working another job rather than live in a rural area where nobody can pay.
The support of the family is the main driver. If being a doctor ceased to be lucrative families would just pay for training in some other more lucrative area.
So yes we should be training more doctors in this country because we waste talent by not having the places. But it would only make a minimal difference to those countries we recruit from in terms of people being able to receive treatment. It might even make it worse if people there stopped training because there were no jobs for them.
How did you vote and why today
Bereavement wipes out everything
What colour car do you have or did you used to drive?
