Farzanah
Has anyone seen what George Eustace has said in Commons about our duff trade deal with Australia and N Zealand?
“Since I now enjoy the freedom of the back benches, I no longer have to put such a positive gloss on what was agreed”.
A propos of this I was following a twitter thread by historian, Robert Saunders, on the way that the Aus trade deal had been deliberately rushed through parliament with no scrutiny, when I came a cross a response which referred back to Philip Hammond's in depth interview on the 'Brexit Witness Archive' web page, which has transcripts of in depth interviews with key people from either side of the Brexit divide.
Anyway this one with Hamond is very interesting and reveals some shocking detail. Most shocking for me is this, about the conference speech May made in 2016 which ruled us out of the Single Market and the CU:
(Hammond) Look, what happened, I was completely stunned by the speech that she made at the Conservative Party Conference in October 2016. I hadn’t seen the relevant part of it in advance. I’d had no input to the speech. Nick Timothy kept me completely away from it. I did see some text on the economy the day before, but I had no idea that she was going to describe Brexit in the hardest possible terms.
My assessment of Theresa May’s Prime Ministership, in terms of Brexit, is that she dug a 20-foot-deep hole in October 2016 in making that speech and, from that moment onwards, cupful by cupful of earth at a time, was trying to fill it in a bit so that she wasn’t in such a deep mess.
Remember, the complex narrative about the nuances of Brexit and so on came much later, so I’m not even sure that she understood, as she was delivering that speech, how extreme the words coming out of her mouth really were. I think if she’d understood, if she realised that she was lining up people like me and metaphorically kicking us in the groin, I don’t think she would have done it. I don’t think that was her intention.
UKICE (interviewer): Was it not, though, to some extent a function of the fact that she, perhaps because of her experience as Home Secretary, interpreted the referendum result as all about immigration? Therefore, leaving the Single Market was almost the ‘sine qua non’ of respecting the referendum result.
PH: Part of Theresa May’s challenge – she’s not going to like me saying this, but if we’re doing a historical record – was that her experience was exclusively in the Home Office. She was the world’s leading expert on everything to do with security and immigration. You couldn’t touch her on it. There was no point even arguing with her on it, but she didn’t have a well-rounded view of the economy.
Because the Prime Minister was obsessed by migration, as were a sizeable chunk of the Tory Party. Even people who weren’t in the extreme wing of the party were very nervous about delivering something on migration. I also think most colleagues – political colleagues – frankly, have only a really rather tenuous grip on, or interest in, how the economy works, and were not particularly taken with the argument that we need these people.
This interview was in 2020. I think that Hammond's concluding words have been completely confirmed now as pretty accurate.
History will decide. I think I said at the beginning of this interview that the terrible thing here is that I am pretty sure that, in the end, the one thing I can guarantee is that, whether we have a no deal Brexit or a hard Brexit with a deal, the price, the cost that that imposes on the economy, will be pretty much 100% absorbed by exactly the demographic profile that voted Leave and then voted Boris Johnson, having never voted Tory before, in December 2019. I’m pretty sure that is almost exactly the definition of the people who are going to bear the costs of Brexit.
ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-witness-archive/philip-hammond/
What shocked me so much was the fact that May delivered that speech and was completely unaware of its implications and possible repercussions (it caused a steep drop in the value of sterling for a start).
The whole interview is long, but really well worth reading. I've just taken out a few extracts. The other interviews on the site are worth reading, too.
Hammond strikes me as being a politician in the John Major mode. One of those decent tories lost to the nation....
The twitter thread that led me to this interview was this one:
twitter.com/redhistorian/status/1592457143676207104