Whitewavemark2
Just read that if say Sunak gets over 50% of the total Tory support. - 179 - then he gets the leadership.
Same goes for Boris, though that is less likely. He is the members' favourite not the MPs'.
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Who?
Whitewavemark2
Just read that if say Sunak gets over 50% of the total Tory support. - 179 - then he gets the leadership.
Same goes for Boris, though that is less likely. He is the members' favourite not the MPs'.
MaizieD
As I posted a couple of days ago. I got the impression from an interview with Graham Brady that the members would be 'consulted'. Which could mean that they'll just be ignored if they choose the wrong person...
Quite!
Johnson thinks that he can win the next election for the Conservatives, I think he is more likely to lose it for them.
He is now a busted flush. The electorate have seen what a duplicitous nincompoop he is and after the way he ignored COVID rules, that he approved, I am sorry, his capacity to win elections has gone.
On the grounds that organised chaos is better than disorganised chaos I would rather they had Sunak.
Johnson's backers are saying he has over 100. I can't think why they imagine anyone will believe them. Only 50 seem to have declared publicly.
I did wonder if Sunak would refuse to stand if Johnson got over 100.
Do you mean they won't go out to the membership if it's over 179 Whitewave. They must be wanting to avoid that, but they have said they will get a vote.
Oh, not James Cordon!
I think his ego is as big as Johnson's.
He would probably want to sing about new policies. 
Ricky would shake things up.
Hunt has already ruled himself out.
I suggested Piers Morgan or Martin Lewis but both have said they wouldn't want to do it.
Ricky Gervais or James Corden have both also been jokingly suggested. So has Hugh Grant. I'm sure anyone of them would be better than most of the actual MPs.
I think Johnson is a committed hedonist and will never change. We have friends like that, good fun to be around, but so exhausting. Luckily they run their own business as no company could afford their easy come, easy go attitude, and totally unreliable.
Johnson should NOT be on holiday when parliament is sitting!! He is paid an mps salary and should be attending not swanning around. He is a disgrace in every respect.
Just read that if say Sunak gets over 50% of the total Tory support. - 179 - then he gets the leadership.
Whitewavemark2
MayBee70
He has reached 100. I can’t believe it. Not content with dividing the country with brexit he now wants to destroy the Conservative party. In retrospect he wouldn’t have cut his holiday short if he hadn’t been confident about the amount of support he had. Even the fact that, at a time of national crisis he was on holiday makes it surreal that some people regard him as a party leader who cares about this country. In his previous incarnations he hasn’t bothered to cut short his holidays when events have happened that needed leadership but when it comes to getting his old job back he’s on the first plane back.
It would be interesting to see how many times he has attended parliament as an MP since the beginning of this session.
Are his constituents willing to put up with this?
My thoughts preceded Chris Mason reporting on BBC News.
‘Scepticism on real extent of Johnson's support
Chris Mason
Political editor
Within moments of those around Boris Johnson claiming they have hit the threshold of 100 MPs backing the former prime minister, scepticism from other Conservative MPs.
"Hogwash", "absolute garbage", "clearly nonsense" are among the phrases being used.
Why?
Well, the publicly-declared number of backers is much, much lower and — bluntly — his track record when it comes to truth is patchy.
These races are all about generating momentum, even a sense of inevitability.
There are MPs inclined to back him but keen to keep their counsel for now — but you can expect a blizzard of demands that Johnson’s team produce a list if their claim is to be seen to be credible.‘
The alleged 100 backing Johnson have not made intention public. Apparently only 50 have come forward. According to the BBC, just now.
Unfortunately WWM2 unless his constituents are party members and vote next week (if there is one) they can do nothing until a GE
MayBee70
He has reached 100. I can’t believe it. Not content with dividing the country with brexit he now wants to destroy the Conservative party. In retrospect he wouldn’t have cut his holiday short if he hadn’t been confident about the amount of support he had. Even the fact that, at a time of national crisis he was on holiday makes it surreal that some people regard him as a party leader who cares about this country. In his previous incarnations he hasn’t bothered to cut short his holidays when events have happened that needed leadership but when it comes to getting his old job back he’s on the first plane back.
It would be interesting to see how many times he has attended parliament as an MP since the beginning of this session.
Are his constituents willing to put up with this?
MaizieD
As I posted a couple of days ago. I got the impression from an interview with Graham Brady that the members would be 'consulted'. Which could mean that they'll just be ignored if they choose the wrong person...
I thought that if one candidate reached 150 + by Monday 2pm they would automatically be PM, if not the top two will be voted on by MPs and Party members.
Conservative Party Members have received their emails with personalised voting passwords
He has reached 100. I can’t believe it. Not content with dividing the country with brexit he now wants to destroy the Conservative party. In retrospect he wouldn’t have cut his holiday short if he hadn’t been confident about the amount of support he had. Even the fact that, at a time of national crisis he was on holiday makes it surreal that some people regard him as a party leader who cares about this country. In his previous incarnations he hasn’t bothered to cut short his holidays when events have happened that needed leadership but when it comes to getting his old job back he’s on the first plane back.
As I posted a couple of days ago. I got the impression from an interview with Graham Brady that the members would be 'consulted'. Which could mean that they'll just be ignored if they choose the wrong person... 
varian
I have just heard that Johnson noel has the support of 100 MPs
It’s not beyond him to bluff. He may have wanted to raise his profile, see what his chances might be, but have no intention of actually standing, thus putting more pressure on Sunak and setting himself up as the leader for later.
They’ve just said that it is thought that Johnson has over 100 supporters.
It may be the big mouths shouting off, but good grief!
If it ends up being Sunak against Johnson, the thought is that the idiot members who judgement is so good will vote for Johnson.
MaizieD
^I know it was by Dr Limberg, Lecturer in Public Policy at King’s College.^
Thanks. I'll look him up, Dickens, there's sure to be a list of his publications somewhere.
Found it.
Here's the Abstract (which Dickens reported accurately). I'll post the link in case anyone would like to read the full, peer reviewed, paper
Abstract
The last 50 years has seen a dramatic decline in taxes on the rich across the advanced democracies. There is still fervent debate in both political and academic circles, however, about the economic consequences of this sweeping change in tax policy. This article contributes to this debate by utilizing a newly constructed indicator of taxes on the rich to identify all instances of major tax reductions on the rich in 18 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries between 1965 and 2015. We then estimate the average effects of these major tax reforms on key macroeconomic aggregates. We find tax cuts for the rich lead to higher income inequality in both the short- and medium term. In contrast, such reforms do not have any significant effect on economic growth or unemployment.
Our results therefore provide strong evidence against the influential political–economic idea that tax cuts for the rich ‘trickle down’ to boost the wider economy.
kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/166207939/Hope_Limberg_SER_2022.pdf
The BBC are reporting that Sunak has 112 backers, Johnson 49 and Mordaunt 21. As of 45 mins ago.
I might be wrong, but didn’t Boris Johnson support Liz Truss as PM?
I have just heard that Johnson noel has the support of 100 MPs
I know it was by Dr Limberg, Lecturer in Public Policy at King’s College.
Thanks. I'll look him up, Dickens, there's sure to be a list of his publications somewhere.
twitter.com/funkTwentySeven/status/1583742255294459904?t=BsHui0O1nKTV7Gx0IAT6ZA&s=19
Trigger alert... this clip contains swearing and satire.
DaisyAnne
^Perhaps you could remind relatives in the US that there is certainly plenty of support for Mr Trump, and it is entirely possible he will get back into the White House.^
They don't need any reminding, Prentice. They share the same feelings as we do. Why would you expect anything different. They are, I would say rightly concerned, about the family back here.
I think the description of Johnson as an addiction applies to Trump and the supporters get a high, simply from supporting the unbelievable.
It’s like a cult isn’t it.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.