growstuff
If Falusi was wearing a wire, there will be evidence of the conversation, so no debate. I don't suppose anybody forced Lady Hussey to say what she did, so no debate. Did Falusi deliberately engage her in conversation and force her to utter the words?
What would be the purpose of wearing a wire? Falusi could only be doing so because she had an ulterior motive. You don't just put a recording device on to go out for the day. If it was because she was out to prove a point, it is reasonable to ask if she manipulated the conversation.
I doubt she was, to be honest. I also don't think she could remember the conversation, word for word, without bias. She has reported at length. People cannot remember verbatim. So, at the very least, what we have heard comes from her. It is her report of what she remembers hearing and how she remembers hearing it. That doesn't make it the unbiased truth by any means. Listening to an interview this morning, she does not seem to think "British" is her culture. She commented about how "elders are treated in our culture". Could her view of others have meant she went prepared to take things the wrong way?
Without doubt, she got a lot of publicity for her views by dealing with them the way she did. Also, without doubt, a few people on GN have decided they are better people than those who don't hold their views. This view seems to make them feel entitled to tell others what to think.
Reference: Estimates of how much of a conversation can be accurately recalled in detail after delays of several minutes to several weeks are quite low and range from 0% to 20% of the total idea units that occurred in the original conversation (Miller, deWinstanley, & Carey, 1996; Pezdek & Prull, 1993; Ross & Sicoly, 1979; Samp & Humphreys, 2007; Stafford, Burggraf, & Sharkey, 1987; Stafford & Daly, 1984)