William Hit Harry (The Guardian)

Am I just being pedantic?
No, it's pretty obvious it's photoshopped.

However, it is meant to deceive and many people will believe it.
He probably was a fun uncle then.

Callistemon21

Possibly, although they must have photshopped George's shorts too.

And the poor little soul's right leg.

They had to photoshop his shorts because in real life his mum's hand is there. It's easier to go with black because you don't have to be so careful about shadows etc.

Am I just being pedantic? Or is it worth worrying that people will believe the most egregious fabrications if it suits their ideas?

So the meme’s have started

X post, mine was in response to Joseanne, Miss Marple in RL 🙂

Harry has modernised the monarchy by turning it into a reality show. Put some cameras in the palace so we can enjoy the soap opera

'I think we should fully embrace the farce, they are celebrities, it is gossip columns. The only question is why are we paying our taxpayers money for this institution.'

A petition has been lodged at Holyrood demanding the abolition of any and all exemptions in Scottish law which have been made for the royal family.

Prince William's silence is doing more to damage

It is discreditable that the palace feels able to simple stay silent while William and others facing accusations of bullying, violence, racism and a whole lot more. "Never explain" is unacceptable. #NotMyKing #AbolishTheMonarchy

Photoshopped ....

Possibly, although they must have photshopped George's shorts too.

OnwardandUpward

Oh I see about the photoshopping now! Which means there are No photos of Harry holding his nephews or nieces? Perhaps this is Royal protocol?

This is getting silly.

You said some story you'd heard was wrong because you'd found a picture of Harry with George.

The picture is photoshopped, it definitely didn't happen.

So any conclusions you have drawn about how Harry, or anybody else, lied about having their photo taken with George, are just rubbish. 🤷🏼

I believe it was New Zealand. In 2014.
Ask someone who knows

Oh I see about the photoshopping now! Which means there are No photos of Harry holding his nephews or nieces? Perhaps this is Royal protocol?

If this means the end of the RF then they'd better all watch out as their lives of privilege will be over. Think Harry is shooting himself in the foot.

2017:

Because Prince Harry now trails behind his nephew and niece in the line of ascension to the throne he was asked about his feelings on the matter
He said, "The reason I am now fifth is because of my nephew and niece and I could never wish them away. They are the most amazing things ever"

Harry has previously chatted about the times he's spent so far with three-year-old George and two-year-old Charlotte, and discussed about how he hopes they'll see him positively as they get older.

Speaking to US magazine People, he said, "George and Charlotte will grow up and hopefully find me to be the fun uncle. I always want to be the fun uncle

He's not as much fun, now, is he. 😥

But if Uncle Harry had never held George as the first nephew/niece that's not what would happen in a so-called normal family is it?
🤔

Whatever normal means.

OnwardandUpward

I didn't make the photo. Where is evidence it's photoshopped?

Yes, it's definitely photoshopped.

Oops forgot.

The picture of Harry was taken in Barbados. I don't think George has ever been to Barbados.

JaneJudge

he hasn't been slagging off ikea too has he? does he not find joy in the candles in warehouse and trying out all the rooms and all the meatballs?

and the daim, who can forget the daim

Who doesn't like Daim ❤

Baby is in a different light. Focal distance is different for baby and for Harry. There's a white line around the baby where it has been badly edited. Harry isn't looking directly at the baby.

I'm quite sure you didn't make it. But somebody did.

I didn't make the photo. Where is evidence it's photoshopped?

OnwardandUpward

So scared that he was spending loads of time with them after his relationship with Chelsy broke down. They all seemed to get along great until M came along as far as I can see, but maybe appearances are deceptive- and maybe people change

www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a10223884/prince-harry-talks-prince-george-princess-charlotte/

By 2019 it was being commented on in the news papers that "Dad to be" Harry was never photographed alone with Prince George, who he had been close to. The story is wrong because I found a photo of them alone when George was a baby. The paper suggested it was because Harry was a spinster when he was single and it would be commented on in a negative way- (but it could actually mean that things had not been quite right since George was a baby or that K&W had something else in mind.)

Having had to explain how Facebook works to another poster yesterday, I'll just say this.

You know that's photoshopped, don't you? That the baby is not really there?

So your entire post is wrong? Ho hum....

he isn't very self aware is he?

he hasn't been slagging off ikea too has he? does he not find joy in the candles in warehouse and trying out all the rooms and all the meatballs?

and the daim, who can forget the daim

Harry had millions of pounds left to him by his mother. Surely no need for IKEA ! Also cousin David Armstrong Jones (another disastrous royal marriage, both parents, toy boys, princess Margaret,riske friends,T.A-J, what a pair. Normal children though!) was a cabinet maker and would possibly have helped to kit them out?!

So scared that he was spending loads of time with them after his relationship with Chelsy broke down. They all seemed to get along great until M came along as far as I can see, but maybe appearances are deceptive- and maybe people change

www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a10223884/prince-harry-talks-prince-george-princess-charlotte/

By 2019 it was being commented on in the news papers that "Dad to be" Harry was never photographed alone with Prince George, who he had been close to. The story is wrong because I found a photo of them alone when George was a baby. The paper suggested it was because Harry was a spinster when he was single and it would be commented on in a negative way- (but it could actually mean that things had not been quite right since George was a baby or that K&W had something else in mind.)

In Spain the book is out already so it won’t have been that difficult to get a copy and a translator, I would’ve thought. Harry an Army officer and he was scared of his brother, come on. I know plenty of brothers who have fought. Just because you are brought up together doesn’t mean you will get on. I know Diana is no longer with us but it would’ve broken her heart and I presume Charles is no different, to see their sons at each other’s throat. Well according to Harry anyway. After all we only get it from one side. Is he trying to bring the monarchy down?

Callistemon21

^- we were driven by our dad, not servants, in a modest auto.^

I think, if you compare that list to many families today, very few would tick every point, or even several points.

Indeed.

However, I was pointing to why "some people" may say his life was decidedly not normal, in response to the question.