Gransnet forums

News & politics

A certain book

(586 Posts)
AussieGran59 Wed 11-Jan-23 08:48:53

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Mollygo Sat 14-Jan-23 08:27:05

Mamie
to read beyond the lines of the text.
Which means adding your own perspective to what you read. If everyone does that, there will be Harry’s truth, embellished with what people have read between the lines of the text. Thus adding to the fiction.

Sarah75 Sat 14-Jan-23 07:34:55

Mamie

Not of William and Kate Sarah75, but yes a bit to Charles. You certainly see what an appalling goldfish bowl like existence it is and the horrors of press attention. This is not particularly from anything Harry says.
It is 400 pages long and as I said before you have to read beyond the lines of the text.
Yes there factual errors and they are annoying.

Interesting, thank you.

Mamie Sat 14-Jan-23 07:29:22

Not of William and Kate Sarah75, but yes a bit to Charles. You certainly see what an appalling goldfish bowl like existence it is and the horrors of press attention. This is not particularly from anything Harry says.
It is 400 pages long and as I said before you have to read beyond the lines of the text.
Yes there factual errors and they are annoying.

maddyone Sat 14-Jan-23 07:25:23

The Opah interview changed my opinion of both Harry and Meghan. I have an extremely difficult relationship with my sister who suffers from mental health issues. However whilst I might mention this to friends or on this anonymous forum, I would never go on television and take part in an interview about how difficult our relationship has been ever since her problems began some thirty five years ago. I wouldn’t embarrass either myself or her in such a way.

maddyone Sat 14-Jan-23 07:19:14

As I understand it much of what Harry has said can be proved historically by known events to be inaccurate or just plain wrong.

Sarah75 Sat 14-Jan-23 07:17:25

Mamie

I also noticed the short sentences and paragraphs at the beginning, but as I got further into it and the style changed I assumed that had been a literary device to reflect the recollections of a young boy. Did nobody else think that?
As for the "book for readers with a short-attention span" remark - well I have actually read it and personally found it required quite a bit of attention and thought.
Interesting thread really - eleven pages of comment on a book most people haven't read. 🤔

Having read it, Mamie, did it change your view of Harry, Meghan, William, Charles, the monarchy in general?

Mamie Sat 14-Jan-23 06:45:20

I doubt it maddyone, but that's the point of it really. Taking a quote completely out of context (which some of them are) is hardly leading to a fair interpretation is it? I was also surprised when I got to some of those bits that some quotes were innacurate or just plain wrong.

maddyone Sat 14-Jan-23 06:27:55

…eleven pages of comment on a book most people haven’t read.

But is there anyone left in the world who hasn’t heard at least some of the incendiary things Harry has alleged?

FannyCornforth Sat 14-Jan-23 06:13:15

I forgot to add Merlot - that was very, very funny!

FannyCornforth Sat 14-Jan-23 06:12:43

J R Moehringer (the ghost) also write Andre Agassi’s acclaimed memoire, so it would be interesting to see the writing style used there

Mamie Sat 14-Jan-23 05:53:53

I also noticed the short sentences and paragraphs at the beginning, but as I got further into it and the style changed I assumed that had been a literary device to reflect the recollections of a young boy. Did nobody else think that?
As for the "book for readers with a short-attention span" remark - well I have actually read it and personally found it required quite a bit of attention and thought.
Interesting thread really - eleven pages of comment on a book most people haven't read. 🤔

Spice101 Fri 13-Jan-23 23:33:39

Apparently Harry is the only one who ever loved the Queen!

Callistemon21 Fri 13-Jan-23 23:08:28

It’s all very sad really. It is sad. He's been poorly advised.

maddyone Fri 13-Jan-23 23:06:24

To be honest, I just wonder what the future does hold for Harry. I can’t see a way back to his family after this. It’s all very sad really.

SOGran Fri 13-Jan-23 22:29:40

merlotgran

He won’t get very far with Louis.

We love this picture, totally uninhibited Louis, the future of the Monarchy in safe ears.
With his concerned Uncle notion, Harry has overstepped the mark as far as William’s children are concerned, now he will not be allowed anywhere near them.

merlotgran Fri 13-Jan-23 22:00:46

Apparently, it is well written by the ghost writer.

Short paragraphs, lots of italics and short chapters.

Obviously aimed at readers with a short attention span. 😂

Kryptonite Fri 13-Jan-23 21:51:25

It has disappeared from our independent bookshop today. Not in the window display or inside. There were 6 copies in Sainsbury's on day 1. I do plan to read it when price reduced. Apparently, it is well written by the ghost writer.

Mollygo Fri 13-Jan-23 21:48:19

Harry should focus on his own marriage and his own children. He’s not exactly looking after their interests is he. People will share with his children the stuff that he’s spouting.

MawtheMerrier Fri 13-Jan-23 21:28:03

merlotgran

If I was his wife it would be, Spare Room!

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Juliet27 Fri 13-Jan-23 21:26:03

Hotel California

merlotgran Fri 13-Jan-23 21:20:59

He won’t get very far with Louis.

SporeRB Fri 13-Jan-23 21:18:38

If Harry managed to gain access to William’s children on the pretence of reforming the monarchy, I would not put it past Harry, sick narcissistic person that he is, to use that opportunity to influence and turn William’s children against their own father.

merlotgran Fri 13-Jan-23 21:17:18

If I was his wife it would be, Spare Room!

Callistemon21 Fri 13-Jan-23 21:13:19

Calendargirl

merlotgran

I wonder what he’ll call his next book?

Don’t think it will be ‘Happy Families’ or ‘Brotherly Love’ somehow.

Movin' on Out?
Then Movin' on Up.
California Dreamin'?

Suggestions on an A4 sheet please.

Calendargirl Fri 13-Jan-23 21:06:00

merlotgran

I wonder what he’ll call his next book?

Don’t think it will be ‘Happy Families’ or ‘Brotherly Love’ somehow.