JaneJudge
MaizieD
Yesterday (30p) Lee Anderson decided to present a member of his staff as evidence anyone on low pay should not need foodbanks
She wasn't exactly on low pay, either. IIRC he said she was earning £34.000 pa. Tis is, I believe, somewhere in the region of median pay (i.e in the middle of the pay range) but it isn't 'low pay'.
he's based the whole of foodbank use on his one member of staff who earns a median wage? is it one of his relatives? --what an shallow individual--
No, she's the daughter of a brigadier and went to a private school (presumably funded by the army). In his Tweet, Anderson implied that she was on low pay, could afford to live in Central London and had enough money for a good lifestyle. He was comparing her with nurses who claim to use foodbanks.
She didn't do anything wrong, but Anderson gave personal details about her and a photo, which enabled her to be identified and loads of details about her private life are all over social media. She's had to delete her Twitter account. Her background means that it's unlikely that her life can be compared with most people on low pay (and it appears she's not low paid anyway).
It's Anderson's integrity and honesty which are in question, quite apart from the dubious legality of publishing her personal details online. It's not clear if she gave permission.