Glorianny
Forsythia
I’ve said this before on here and been attacked by the usual suspects but asylum seekers and migrants are big business. How many of these posting in here in favour are housing refugees in their own home or local area? Lawyers, so called charities like Care for Calais, migrant support groups, interpreters, the hotel chains who’ve sold out etc etc ….. all these would no longer be needed if abuse of the system was clamped down on.
As for the ones in the Daily Mail saying they want a big house, trampoline in the garden etc it’s the sense of entitlement that angers those of us who do not support unfettered immigration into this country.
If that makes me an unfeeling racist according to Volver, MaizieD and their supporters I really do not care!
It's quite simple Forsythia. If there was a clear, competent, speedy assessment process. If asylum seekers were permitted to work whilst their application was processed there wouldn't be a problem. They would be out at work and paying taxes.
As for wanting a house with a trampoline in the garden I thought that was the sort of migrant we wanted. Ones with aspirations who will contribute to the economy and society. Like the family of our own dear PM
I agree with you Glorianny. They should all be working, it should be compulsory. No ifs or buts about it. Only last night on Countryfile there were salad growers in Lee complaining they couldn’t get workers, will have to shut down etc. these individuals should all be working and contributing, paid or voluntarily while they are housed and fed in the UK.
As for Rishi Sunak’s kids I’ve not any idea if they own a trampoline or not but if they do he would have paid for it through his or his wife’s earnings. He isn’t demanding it as a right and that others should be paying for along with a big house to put it in, this was quoted by the migrant interviewed.
I often agree with a lot of your comments. On this, we must politely accept we disagree.