Well seeing as how violetsky has again dragged trans into the discussion, maybe this is worth looking at
A patient who was raped by a transgender woman on a hospital ward could not have been raped because her attacker is defined as a woman, heard the House of Lords.
Police were told by hospital staff that the reported incident was not true, telling officers: "There was no male in the hospital, therefore the rape could not have happened."
During a debate on single-sex hospital wards, Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne, a Conservative Life peer shared the story which left the victim on "the edge of a nervous breakdown."
The hospital was able "to tell a straightforward lie" she said. Adding that only a year after the reported assault took place, and after CCTV and witness statements were taken, were the hospital willing to admit to the incident.
Lady Baroness said: "[The hospital] forgot that there was CCTV, nurses and observers.
"Nonetheless, it has taken nearly a year for the hospital to agree that there was a male on the ward and, yes, this rape happened. During that year [the woman] has almost come to the edge of a nervous breakdown, because being disbelieved about being raped in hospital has been such an appalling shock.
"The hospital, with all its CCTV, has had to admit that the rape happened and that it was committed by a man.
The alleged attack, at an undisclosed hospital, is a situation that has been warned of by campaigners who seek to protect single-sex places.