MaizieD
growstuff
Maizie I'm not sure that's absolutely true. My grandfather made it to the top of the civil service tree and he worked in the same department from 1919 until the 1960s. I currently have other relatives who have worked in the same department for decades.
I'm not altogether sure, but it was a very long time ago.
I'm reporting on what Professor Chapman told us in the '90s and what Dunt has more recently deduced, after extensive interviews and research.
But surely we've always known that they start as generalists. And we get situations like the setting up of the Department for Exiting the EU where huge numbers were drafted into a completely unprecedented new department.
Just reading the reports.
What I do know is that my grandfather worked in the same department all his life, even through a couple of name changes, and made it to gonghood. My grandfather was a Conservative to the core, but had to work directly with Attlee. I doubt very much if he let his politics get in the way of his work. What he didn't know about his specialism wasn't worth knowing.
I have a cousin who is a senior civil service scientist, who has also always worked in the same department, although he had a break when he worked in industry. He has a PhD and is no way an amateur.
My daughter was a Fast Track trainee, who has worked in two different departments and a quango (with civil service terms and conditions) and had a break when she worked in industry. She's a HR specialist, so I guess her skills are transferable and has been very well-trained and supported by the civil service.
The son of a friend is currently a SpAd in the Treasury, having previously been a civil servant in the DSHC. He was head-hunted and I understand there was a financial reward. Funnily enough, he doesn't support the Conservatives.
It seems to me that at least some of the recommendations of the Fulton Report were taken on board.