It's long been part of Labour Party doctrine that it's a Labour government or nothing and they don't do coalitions, so no great surprise there. If they were short of a majority after the next election I imagine they would first look at the feasibility of running a minority government as long as possible, like Harold Wilson in 1964 and 1974a, either calling a fresh election if they ran into trouble or arranging a confidence and supply agreement as James Callaghan did in the last year or so of his government. It's a tricky game to play though, and Starmer is no Harold Wilson with the wiles to carry that off.
I'm an advocate for proper PR, as we have in Scotland for local elections. I hope that would bring an end to the two-party machine system and introduce a wider range of opinion and more pragmatic legislation rather than one monolithic bloc ramming contentious legislation through by brute force. Never mind 'strong' government with compromise being a dirty word.
“We are killing like we haven’t killed since 1967”


