Anniebach
2 hour chase through New York, they were in a taxi ! ! ! !
Yes and they travelled almost 200 yds in that time - it was New York after all!
Sign up to Gransnet Daily
Our free daily newsletter full of hot threads, competitions and discounts
Subscribe
Just now
Anniebach
2 hour chase through New York, they were in a taxi ! ! ! !
Yes and they travelled almost 200 yds in that time - it was New York after all!
"Near catastrophic", "Multiple near collisions", "relentless pursuit", "reckless", and unfortunate and IMHO inappropriate comparisons drawn with the horrific event which killed Diana. The taxi driver who was briefly involved said he certainly wouldn't describe it as a "chase", and one of the pursuers was on a bicycle. Really? Also, according to the NYPD, the only person cautioned about dangerous driving was one of H&M's security detail in an SUV. NYPD also reported that there had been "no injuries, collisions, or arrests". Even Scobie is frantically back-pedalling (attempted damage limitation?) and referring to an "over-emotional" initial description of the event. Since 9/11, Manhattan has been literally dripping with CCTV security cameras, so it should certainly be easy to piece together what actually happened, and to see this "drama" unfold in detail. Is anyone demanding that such evidence be produced? If I'd been subjected to such a "terrifying" ordeal, I most certainly would be. Funny how it's all gone quiet in that area. As for the Mayor of New York being the only person to mention speed as a factor, I don't think that H&M's spokesman's definition of a "chase", particularly when qualified by descriptions such as "near catastrophic", "relentless pursuit", "multiple near collisions" and "reckless" was intended to convey that this was anything less than mayhem on wheels.. which it clearly wasn't. Own goal, I fear.. and one of many. They just keep smashing them into the back of their net, don't they? Strange mindset, but they clearly don't see it that way...
I agree with Andrew Marr. It's a nasty way to earn a living photographing people without their permission. Although it didn't seem as bad as was first reported Harry I believe is fragile and something like this may have sent his stress levels soaring.
I am not interested in this couple at all but feel that what happened was very wrong. I would feel this way about anyone who felt threatened.
Andrew Marr? Hilarious.
Great comments by Andrew Marr, full of understanding www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJcQdUROLMA
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Oh dear, have a rattled a few cages? I suppose that's the problem with having a lofty perch...😉
I'm so grateful that you are often there when I post, letting me know how angry you are that I post.
Talk about them all you like, I don't want to stop it. Just be aware how angry you all are about a minor royal and a former actress who won't behave as you want them to...
I don't "defend" Meghan, I just don't demonise or spread lies about her. What it's all got to do with Boris, I have no idea....but I'm sure it all makes sense to you.
Get down from that lofty perch volver. You have no inside information on what’s lies or truth about Meghan. There’s been many lies coming from her own mouth but you don’t seem to get so righteously aggrieved over them. 
Every time there’s a thread about H & M you’re straight in trying to put a stop to it. Give it a rest.
Poor dears. Wonder if they realise how some people can’t give a tinker’s cuss about their ever silly antics to gain publicity.
volver3
Louella12
We didn't get all this hooha when Princess Anne was held at gun point.
It was 1974.
You need to move on, honestly.
Why?
Were people more resilient then?
Seems the H&M version differs markedly from the NYPD version.
Spot on Daddima!
Maybe a News Service could explain what happened, Gloriannay
merlotgran
volver3
Louella12
We didn't get all this hooha when Princess Anne was held at gun point.
It was 1974.
You need to move on, honestly.
So what if it was 1974? It’s a valid point.
Meghan is a gift to republicans - a star player. No matter what she and Harry say or do they will be defended at all costs by the same people who are happy to pour vitriolic scorn on the likes of Boris and Carrie Johnson et al.
I really don’t believe that intelligent people can be that gullible.
Who is gullible? I have no idea exactly how it felt to be in that car. I have never been pursued by paparazzi. My mother wasn't killed as a result of their actions.
I find it reasonable to suppose they wanted to know where M&H were staying. I have seen they stopped at a police station and had to transfer to a taxi. They were still being followed and photographed. I find it reasonable to suppose they were frightened and upset.
Others may have a different opinion.
But I would like to know how anyone persuades, encourages or stages a chase by paparazzi around NY without someone telling a news service they've done it. Paps just want cash so someone would be selling their story
Well people tried to assassinate Victoria a couple of times. I wonder how she reacted? The late Queen never turned an eyebrow when that chap shot at her at the Trooping of the Colour. But K&W sued the person who tried to take pictures of Kate when they didn't want her picture to be taken.
Rude posts about how intelligent or gullible your interlocutors are won't hack it either.
I don't "defend" Meghan, I just don't demonise or spread lies about her. What it's all got to do with Boris, I have no idea....but I'm sure it all makes sense to you.
Yellowmellow
NYPD have a different take on it
Do they? Theres video posted on this thread of the taxi and the 2 squad cars. Always best to check before commenting.
volver3
Louella12
We didn't get all this hooha when Princess Anne was held at gun point.
It was 1974.
You need to move on, honestly.
So what if it was 1974? It’s a valid point.
Meghan is a gift to republicans - a star player. No matter what she and Harry say or do they will be defended at all costs by the same people who are happy to pour vitriolic scorn on the likes of Boris and Carrie Johnson et al.
I really don’t believe that intelligent people can be that gullible.
varian
Princess Mako of Japan gave up her royal status when she married a commoner and went to live in the USA. As far as I know she and her husband do not seek publicity and are not hounded by the paparazzi. They just get on with their lives quietly, still wealthy and privileged but not in the spotlight. If H&M wanted to lead quiet lives presumably they could do the same.
Ooh the Japanese royal family where women can't inherit the crown and they HAVE to renounce their title if (as Mako did) they marry a commoner.
Let's see under those rules. Anne, Beatrice ,and Eugenie aren't princesses any more. Nor was Margaret.
Harry though would still be a Prince, because they can and have married commoners.
NYPD have a different take on it
Foxygloves
Glorianny
So there's no hatred on here.
But one poor bloke, who married a woman so many on GN hate, was driving round New York trying not to panic as the car he was in was pursued by Papparazi, all trying to get a shot of them. They had to eventually leave the safety of their secure vehicle and take a taxi through New York, and even the taxi driver says there were still people taking flash photographs. The bloke's mother died in similar circumstances.
But hey they left the UK. They deserve all they get.
Sympathy apparently stops at the Atlantic Ocean.Let’s unpick this
1) paps were following (note the less emotive term than “pursuing”) a car and trying to take photographs. That’s what photographers do, especially of so-called “celebrities”
One was on a bicycle 🤣
2) they left the safety of their secure vehicle and took a taxi
Well, really. How misguided was that.
Taxi drivers are presumably good drivers but unlike the Sussexes own security detail unlikely to be security checked or necessarily experienced in avoiding /escape tactics as any security team driver should be.
Cf the driver in Paris - what could possibly go wrong?
3) the taxi driver said the photographers were still taking flash photographs -yes, it was at night
4) “the blokes mother died under similar circumstances “
Not quite, that was a high speed car chase in a notoriously dangerous tunnel, the driver had been drinking, the passengers were not wearing seat belts. Oh that last bit is the same.
Get real.
Just for once turn off your own prejudices and stop assuming anybody who is sceptical of this non-story necessarily “hates” anybody.
You missed out they stopped at a police station and were advised to use a taxi! Just a small point. The police held the photographers at bay with two cars with sirens and lights flashing.
But of course you know they should have stayed wit their car
Princess Mako of Japan gave up her royal status when she married a commoner and went to live in the USA. As far as I know she and her husband do not seek publicity and are not hounded by the paparazzi. They just get on with their lives quietly, still wealthy and privileged but not in the spotlight. If H&M wanted to lead quiet lives presumably they could do the same.
Not if it all doesnt go well for them? I dont know. Dont follow it all well enough or go into it all well enough to know.
Anniebach
Can it not be assumed their official spokesperson speaks for them
I dont know. Can it?
BlueBalou
GagaJo
lemsip
GagaJo
Are the haters on here going to mock when a member of their family gets hurt?
Probably, if the bile directed at them is anything to go by on here.
What about if someone dies? I'm sure that will also be grist to the mill.
I'm absolutely disgusted by some of you.GagaJo you belong to this same forum so part and parcel of the same group and on all threads!
The hatred on here is disgusting. You should all be ashamed.
Not hatred just sheer exasperation at the behaviour of this money- and attention-seeking pair.
If this latest episode is to copy what happened to Diana then it makes me wonder just how much lower they’ll go to get headlines.
Clearly very few people are convinced by this latest attempt to grab attention --and get footage for the next Netflix saga and Books 2, 3 and 4--
About 5 people on this thread approx.
Can it not be assumed their official spokesperson speaks for them
Have Meghan and Harry actually said anything themselves?
No one need answer if they dont want to.
I cant be bothered to find out myself.
If they havent said anything, then perhaps nothing to see. At all.
I don't buy into the "which camp are you in" thing. If you support H&M you therefore have to hate W&K. If you are fans of W&K you have to ridicule H&M. It's nobodies business if KC or William have contacted Harry. It'll be in the next book (non sarcasm).
(It's the bloody press, the flaming media, whipping up click baits to distract from the bigger picture. Strikes, the Just Stop Oil, Gas prices, war in Ukraine - the people that own the Big Media know that Politicians will see them right - wine and dine, OBE's, CBE's, Lord & Lady whatever - if they can just get the public eye off what is really going on out there).
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.