Gransnet forums

News & politics

Spotify dumps deal with Harry and Meghan

(227 Posts)
nanna8 Fri 16-Jun-23 08:28:34

What a surprise! It wouldn’t be a good look to keep letting them use their platform, makes sense from their point of view.

Anniebach Mon 19-Jun-23 13:36:12

She loves being a celebrity, are celebrities private individuals?

CheersMeDears Mon 19-Jun-23 14:05:31

Depends on what they're famous for doesn't it! Is she famous or infamous now?

Callistemon21 Mon 19-Jun-23 14:20:24

Glorianny

Hang on someone further up said she was short from waist to hip, now she's short nape to waist!
Her neck looks quite long to me and very prettily framed by the collar.
I'd settle for her body any day. 5ft 7in so not too tall, with nice boobs, a good waist and slim hips. She's a good example to younger girls, not like the anorexics who sometimes model clothes

I'd look like her if I was stretched to 5'7" (and toned up a bit 😁)

TerriBull Mon 19-Jun-23 14:32:06

Natalie Portman modes for Dior, I don't think she is particularly tall, although she is very pretty, striking in fact. That's not to say Meghan isn't striking that is, but possibly not much taller than NP>

TerriBull Mon 19-Jun-23 14:32:21

models not modes.

tickingbird Mon 19-Jun-23 16:18:43

I don’t believe Meghan is 5’7”. She’s stated she’s not very tall and 5’ 7” with the very high heels she wears would make her nearer 6’, She’s probably closer to 5’4” in bare feet.

Lathyrus Mon 19-Jun-23 16:36:16

I don’t think she’s 5’7” either.

Catherine is 5’9 and if you look at old photos of them side by side, both in heels, Meghan is quite a bit shorter. I’d say 5’4” too.

Nothing wrong with that. I’ve often envied the more petite

Joseann Tue 20-Jun-23 08:07:25

I'd say probably around 3 inches difference, but stick a feather on your hat and it levels out.

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 20-Jun-23 08:21:31

So she can’t even tell the truth about her height 🤥

CheersMeDears Tue 20-Jun-23 08:31:10

Ah but there's the truth and her truth Germansheperdsmum. Vast difference! wink

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 20-Jun-23 08:33:07

Ah yes - a stranger to the truth.

NotSpaghetti Tue 20-Jun-23 08:49:31

Callistemon21

The second picture has been heavily airbrushed 🙂

Which is the second picture?
Not quite sure what you mean,.. sorry

Glorianny Tue 20-Jun-23 10:19:01

Meghan Markle was an actress. Actresses can get away with adding or subtracting an inch or so, but not much more, because if a casting call is for a woman to play opposite a 5ft 7in man and they want someone shorter they are not pleased if the woman who claims to be 5ft 6in is really 5ft 10in. And it works the other way. If the hero is 6ft 4in shooting with a woman who is 5ft 4 in and not 5ft 7in brings a load of problems. Actresses CVs list their physical attributes.

Callistemon21 Tue 20-Jun-23 10:29:20

NotSpaghetti

Callistemon21

The second picture has been heavily airbrushed 🙂

Which is the second picture?
Not quite sure what you mean,.. sorry

Joseann Mon 19-Jun-23 07:05:05

The J'Adore Dior model picture

We could all look like that with a bit of airbrushing wink

Calendargirl Tue 20-Jun-23 11:20:45

I would have guessed her height to be about 5’ 5” at most. Her heels add another 3 or 4 inches of course, but if you look back to her first public appearance with Harry at the Invictus Games, casually dressed in ripped jeans I think and flat pumps, (haven’t looked it up, this is how I remember it), she looked extremely petite.

Of course, beside Catherine, tall and slim, also in towering heels most of the time, she can’t help but look short.

Anniebach Tue 20-Jun-23 11:34:35

It has to be a very stupid actress who lies about her height to get a part in a film

Glorianny Tue 20-Jun-23 11:39:18

Anniebach

It has to be a very stupid actress who lies about her height to get a part in a film

She would have been measured continually Annie it isn't something you can lie about.
Charlize Theron varies from %ft 9in-5ft 10in, but says it's because she bends her head forward.
Doria Raglan is 5ft 4in. Meghan is taller, or is Doria lying as well?

Lathyrus Tue 20-Jun-23 12:07:00

Glorianny

Meghan Markle was an actress. Actresses can get away with adding or subtracting an inch or so, but not much more, because if a casting call is for a woman to play opposite a 5ft 7in man and they want someone shorter they are not pleased if the woman who claims to be 5ft 6in is really 5ft 10in. And it works the other way. If the hero is 6ft 4in shooting with a woman who is 5ft 4 in and not 5ft 7in brings a load of problems. Actresses CVs list their physical attributes.

Natalie Portman stood on a block for her Thor movie to increase her height and said it made making fighting moves quite hazardous.

Clark Gable wore built up shoes and I believe several of Dustin Hoffman’s leading ladies stood in dug out spaces.

And one rung down is an old trick

At a Lord of the Rings Exhibition it was intentional see the tricks that enabled Frodo to look so much smaller than Gandalf, especially the modified cart where they sat side by side.

I don’t think height is very important in the movies😬

Lathyrus Tue 20-Jun-23 12:08:28

intentional = interesting

Resolution- read before posting

tickingbird Tue 20-Jun-23 12:14:57

I don’t think height is very important in the movies😬

Spot on Lathyrus. Movies are make believe. Tom Cruise has often had a much taller leading lady but you wouldn’t know it from watching the films.

Jaberwok Tue 20-Jun-23 12:17:30

Allegedly Meghan is not in talks with Dior. Sources deny rumours that she is in line for a megabucks deal. Mind you its hard to know what to believe with H &M.

Calendargirl Tue 20-Jun-23 12:46:09

Alan Ladd was another ‘short’ actor.

Probably stood on a box to mount his horse!

Callistemon21 Tue 20-Jun-23 12:49:34

Calendargirl

Alan Ladd was another ‘short’ actor.

Probably stood on a box to mount his horse!

Which actor was it who had to stand on a box to kiss his leading lady?

TerriBull Tue 20-Jun-23 13:10:51

Here are some wise words from Trevor Phillips from an article in yesterday's Times entitled "We can't just magic away prejudice and poverty"

"Thank you Spotify for cancelling the Duchess of Sussex's podcast Archetypes. Ditto Netflix for sparing us her animated series Pearl, whatever that was about. I know I didn't have to listen or watch them, and I'm well aware of where the off button is. But the corporate change of heart matters. The reported $100 million showered on the Sussexes' vapourings are just a token of the vast stream of cash and attention directed towards motivational fairy tales, a craven surrender to magical thinking that punishes the poor and disadvantaged by selling them a dream that can never be delivered. It's high time that money went to talented creatives who actually have something to say. There were many things wrong with the podcast itself. The sheer amateurishness of the stories of talented women such as Serena Williams and Mariah Carey beneath the tidal wave of Meghan's ego, the duchess moaning about exile to a $14 million dollar beach side mansion, while patronising Carey whose family had their car set alight and their dog poisoned for being the wrong colour for their neighbourhood. But the real crime here was the corporate funding of a dangerous fiction that now governs too many areas of public life, including politics: the flat out lie that you can be anything that you want to be. All you have to do is want it enough. The corollary to this drivel is profoundly reactionary; no intelligent progressive has ever believed this. Remedies to inequality and injustice do not lie purely in the hands of individuals. No one was ever denied the right to live in Montecito just because they lacked the determination to become a princess. Parents of small children are familiar with a version of the idea, because we play along with it in every panto season when Tinker Bell dies we are asked to clap our hands and believe that fairies exist - because if they do, they will live and lo and behold Tinker Bell lives! "

That is an opening text that forms part of an article that goes on to expand on other matters.

Whenever I read a Trevor Phillips article he always seems to speak a lot of sense to me. I can't say whether his assessment of Meghan's podcasts are fair or not, because I've never listened to them, if I listen to a podcast my choice would be something like "and the rest is history" mainly because I'd prefer to learn something I didn't know rather than give time to a content that critics deem to be waffle.

Turning to his assessment about make believe, my thoughts are that is very much the thrust of corporate America, in which they excel at we, Britain are woeful in comparison, I remember taking my children to Chessington World of Adventure, entering the castle of chocolate only to be told "sorry we've run out of chocolate" that is peculiarly British imo, maybe we are a bit more invested in life as it really is! Possibly one of the aspects Meghan found unappealing about living here. I'm casting my mind back to the first time I took my kids to Disneyland, a microcosm of a world that feeds into most children's fantasy where everything is wonderful, cosy, sanitised and hunky dory until you step out side the Magic Kingdom and face a harsh reality, which I imagine is even harsher nowadays with the number of displaced people living on the streets.

Lathyrus Tue 20-Jun-23 13:33:39

Callistemon21

Calendargirl

Alan Ladd was another ‘short’ actor.

Probably stood on a box to mount his horse!

Which actor was it who had to stand on a box to kiss his leading lady?

That was Alan Ladd. They dug a trench for Sophia Loren to walk in beside him.😬