Interesting that a journalist of all people should describe society as being "voyeuristic", when the level of public engagement with any particular story defines how successful he/she is in their job. So in the same breath, were they referring to it as a moral negative, but also as a commercial positive? Mixed message? As regards the public reaction to a news story such as this one, when does an understandable level of natural curiosity and concern actually become an "unhealthy interest"? Perhaps when the apocryphal coffin-chasers out there put undue pressure on the families and the friends of the victims. To be fair, I haven't seen any of that yet, and I believe that journalistic codes of practises these days are generally better than they were in the past.. although there will always be exceptions.