I worked in a maternity hospital as a social worker and dealt with several similar scenarios during my time there.
One 15 year old gave birth on her own in her bedroom, having been sent home from school with "tummy ache." The baby died by suffocation - I will not give details as it might outing even though this happened a long time ago. The CPS took the view that this was neither manslaughter nor infanticide as the coroner's verdict was: "Death by lack of attention at birth", even though there were actions that caused the death. I felt that, although the letter of the law might have been followed only loosely, the spirit was right, as this girl needed help and support for the future, which I hope we were able to give her.
I do not think the girl currently in custody nor society will be best served by this harsh sentence. I am sure we all feel for the baby and for her, but have to ask what purpose is served by this sentence. Given that she was a resident of Herefordshire, whose children's services have been in special measures for years and who are about to be descended on by officials from another authority to try and lick them into shape, she is in one way being punished for their shortcomings (and their underfunding). It does sound as though she was a vulnerable child and she is likely not to have been picked up and helped as she should have been.
In prison she will mix with drug addicts, be offered drugs, and likely get into debt for them - this is how British prisons operate (don't ask me how I know - trust me on this one - I do know). Rehabilitation and support is a joke in prison and she has just been condemned to a downhill slide. Any hope of her being able to lead a decent life has now gone.
Should she be punished for being a vulnerable and scared child? Is she a danger to the public and needs locking up?
How ironic - some HMRC staff essentially committing fraud.


