I think the complicating factor in this case as far as the GMC was concerned though maddyone is that the manager in question was also a doctor, he was the medical director, so would also have been involved. Presumably what happened is that they believed the evidence he presented?
Ian Harvey, the Medical Director referred to, has told the DT that he could not recall any paediatricians at C of C contacting him with concerns about neonatal deaths in February 1916 as they claimed.
"It is surprising, given the level of concern that some of the paediatricians professed having had at that time, that there was no follow-up to chase a response, either with my secretary, or directly with me" said Mr. Harvey.
He claimed to have had an open-door policy but that at "no time prior to May 2016 did a consultant come to my office to express or discuss their concerns."
Dr.Breary rejected this version of events ; he requested a meeting in February but Harvey did not respond for 3 months, and also said he had emails referring to Mr. Harvey's reply from early March, and added "we did chase repeatedly."
Harvey and his wife left their home in France the morning before Letby was given a whole life sentence, and has reportedly told colleagues 'any inquiry into these killings would have to find me first.'
Never mind the doctors 'not pursuing it'; this Medical Director should have been alert to this spike in deaths and demanding answers, as part of his highly paid job.
This is why a judicial review is needed, this man is not going to admit to anything at an independent enquiry with his £1.8 million pension at stake.