Gransnet forums

News & politics

More than 100 schools told to close buildings over safety fears

(383 Posts)
Wyllow3 Thu 31-Aug-23 17:34:28

.......More than 100 schools told to close buildings over safety fears
www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-66461879

“The impact of this change, just a few days before the start of term, can’t be underestimated for those schools that are affected.

Up until this point, schools with confirmed RAAC were being told to get plans in place just in case buildings had to be evacuated.

Now, all of a sudden, those hypothetical evacuations have become a daunting reality. Schools are being told they can’t use affected buildings unless safety measures are installed.

That’s ok for the 52 schools that already have mitigations in place, but for the 104 schools that don’t, it’s a problem”.

It is not clear who is supposed to pay (see article)

EEJit Sun 03-Sept-23 12:09:29

Hetty58

Too little, far too late - just as expected from this government, so no surprise to me either.

It's not only this government. Most of the schools were built in the 60s under Labour. They knew it was only supposed to last 30 years, Labour again in the 90s.

And before I'm accused of being a Conservative, I detest both parties.

Casdon Sun 03-Sept-23 12:14:51

EEJit

Hetty58

Too little, far too late - just as expected from this government, so no surprise to me either.

It's not only this government. Most of the schools were built in the 60s under Labour. They knew it was only supposed to last 30 years, Labour again in the 90s.

And before I'm accused of being a Conservative, I detest both parties.

It was only in 2018 that it was realised that apparently flaw free RAAC could collapse, when it happened in a school. Labour had plans to replace or restore all schools with known RAAC issues in 2010, but that was scrapped by the Tory government. I think all governments did have a responsibility to ensure a register of building materials used through the years was developed and retained, but the current state caused by lack of investment in the state of schools is squarely down to the successive Tory governments of the last 13 years.

MaizieD Sun 03-Sept-23 12:15:48

EEJit

Hetty58

Too little, far too late - just as expected from this government, so no surprise to me either.

It's not only this government. Most of the schools were built in the 60s under Labour. They knew it was only supposed to last 30 years, Labour again in the 90s.

And before I'm accused of being a Conservative, I detest both parties.

by the time the 30 years was up, there was a tory government bent on reducing state spending.
It has been pointed out the the subsequent late 90s, Labour governments (Blair/Brown) planned to replace the schools but the programme was halted by Gove.

Gwenisgreat Sun 03-Sept-23 12:25:45

I remember my 5 year old daughter telling a nurse in the hospital telling her she should stop working in the falling down hospital and DD was definitely not going to be a nurse! That hospital has since been rebuilt over 40 years ago! So this is a new problem?

Whitewavemark2 Sun 03-Sept-23 12:26:01

EEJit

Hetty58

Too little, far too late - just as expected from this government, so no surprise to me either.

It's not only this government. Most of the schools were built in the 60s under Labour. They knew it was only supposed to last 30 years, Labour again in the 90s.

And before I'm accused of being a Conservative, I detest both parties.

Labour had a multi-billion rebuilding plan aimed primarily at these schools.

Gove cancelled it completel6.

growstuff Sun 03-Sept-23 12:34:50

Apparently, the thinking in the 1990s was that even time-expired RAAC was still safe. It wasn't until 2018 that a school ceiling collapsed and some inspections were done that it was realised how serious the situation was.

www.theguardian.com/education/2023/sep/01/how-long-has-raac-in-schools-been-a-concern-and-what-happens-now

To confirm its presence, extensive works are required, involving the removal of false ceilings and asbestos to get to the material, requiring specialist asbestos contractors and scaffolding.

To confirm its presence, extensive works are required, involving the removal of false ceilings and asbestos to get to the material, requiring specialist asbestos contractors and scaffolding.

To confirm its presence, extensive works are required, involving the removal of false ceilings and asbestos to get to the material, requiring specialist asbestos contractors and scaffolding.

To confirm RAAC's presence requires specialist, extensive work, including the removal of false ceilings and asbestos. Specialist asbestos contractors and scaffolding are needed.

That's just to confirm it, even without its replacement.

mazzie66 Sun 03-Sept-23 12:34:51

Growstuff. My apologies if my comment came across that way. I didn’t intend to cause offence.

growstuff Sun 03-Sept-23 12:35:08

mazzie66

Growstuff. My apologies if my comment came across that way. I didn’t intend to cause offence.

No problem.

growstuff Sun 03-Sept-23 12:39:09

Gwenisgreat

I remember my 5 year old daughter telling a nurse in the hospital telling her she should stop working in the falling down hospital and DD was definitely not going to be a nurse! That hospital has since been rebuilt over 40 years ago! So this is a new problem?

Meanwhile, this is my sister's local hospital.

Stella14 Sun 03-Sept-23 12:42:30

Callistemon21

By they I mean the Government as head teachers have been reporting problems and trying to deal with this for some time now.

They have known for 5-years, since a ceiling collapsed in a school in 2018. Yet they have waited until a few days before the new term 5-years later to take this action. The incompetence of this Government knows no bounds.
www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/raac-crisis-escalates-as-more-than-100-schools-told-to-get-out-now

Glorianny Sun 03-Sept-23 12:47:53

EEJit

Hetty58

Too little, far too late - just as expected from this government, so no surprise to me either.

It's not only this government. Most of the schools were built in the 60s under Labour. They knew it was only supposed to last 30 years, Labour again in the 90s.

And before I'm accused of being a Conservative, I detest both parties.

As has been said there was a rebuilding programme under Labour.

A school collapsed in 2018. But only recently has it been discovered that the concrete does not necessarily show signs of any strain before becoming dangerous and liable to collapse.
The Tory government was probably hoping some of these schools would survive just beyond the next GE when they could happily pass the cost onto a Labour government, and then they could complain about the level of spending!

If it shows anything this whole debacle shows how wrong it is to imagine cutting costs, and not investing in school buildings, is any sort of policy to pursue. Of course substantial numbers of children belonging to many politicians, the rich and the powerful won't be affected because they are in private schools.

Philippa111 Sun 03-Sept-23 12:52:30

What a sham. Mr Sunak speaking and promising that, "Your children will be safe" as if its some anomaly that , we, the common people should be grateful for. There are no words strong enough to describe how heinous this government is. The issue was pointed out ages ago.

Do a few children have to get hurt of die before this Tory government takes action? And, of course ,you can guarantee that their kids, most of whom will be in private schools, won't be affected... they will be safe, thank you very much, and have the uninterrupted education that all children deserve.

Lizzie44 Sun 03-Sept-23 12:53:03

More evidence of broken Britain. Chickens coming home to roost. I feel so sorry for the children (and parents) caught up in this. Children have had a difficult time in recent years with the unavoidable disruptions from Covid. The current last-minute buildings crisis could have been avoided with regular and appropriate surveys, maintenance and repair.

Riggie Sun 03-Sept-23 13:17:12

I'm feeling deja vu here.when I went to uni in the 70s, our library was closed for half the year due to a previous scare over concrete.
In fact there's an article I found about the similarities with the current one- dated 2021 so not sure why it's taken so long to do anything
www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/concrete-crisis-blighting-nhs-hospitals-echoes-1970s-hac-debacle-25-08-2021/

growstuff Sun 03-Sept-23 13:20:31

EEJit

Hetty58

Too little, far too late - just as expected from this government, so no surprise to me either.

It's not only this government. Most of the schools were built in the 60s under Labour. They knew it was only supposed to last 30 years, Labour again in the 90s.

And before I'm accused of being a Conservative, I detest both parties.

The schools affected in Essex were built since the 1960s by Essex County Council (or its predecessor), which was Conservative.

Susieq62 Sun 03-Sept-23 13:39:55

Grand daughter’s school affected! Not sure what is happening!
Local hospital had to be rebuilt as well !
Gov has known about this for years!
13 years of incompetence springs to mind ! Nothing surprises me anymore !

Joseann Sun 03-Sept-23 13:51:21

And, of course, you can guarantee that their kids, most of whom will be in private schools, won't be affected... they will be safe, thank you very much.
Now that is a silly thing to say. Even children of the royals are in private schools which may not be immune to crumbling concrete. It isn't just the school buildings, it is also the extensions which were added as schools expanded during this period.

Hetty58 Sun 03-Sept-23 14:17:02

So, here we are - in a rich country, risking the lives of children. I'm sure that safety assessments have been done and are ongoing - yet this material is notoriously difficult to assess. Brickwork or stonework would show some cracking and movement before any collapse, steel supports or frames would bend - but, oh no, it was just fine to build schools with this stuff.

I suppose, like asbestos, the potential danger wasn't apparent back then. Now that it is, we expect prompt and drastic action, surely.

Glorianny Sun 03-Sept-23 14:38:39

Joseann

^And, of course, you can guarantee that their kids, most of whom will be in private schools, won't be affected... they will be safe, thank you very much.^
Now that is a silly thing to say. Even children of the royals are in private schools which may not be immune to crumbling concrete. It isn't just the school buildings, it is also the extensions which were added as schools expanded during this period.

So do you imagine the children in private schools will be sent home, or crowded into unsuitable temporary accommodation at short notice?
And yes the royals are in private schools. Perhaps if they weren't but, they were in state schools, more would be done to maintain those schools.

Jess20 Sun 03-Sept-23 14:40:06

I guess the poor timing is partly because MPs are on recess over the summer. They've known about this, particularly with hospitals, for ages, years, and done nothing about it. There's also widespread asbestos in school buildings, hopefully that's in earlier ones but it could add to the difficulty in making it all safe again.

Callistemon21 Sun 03-Sept-23 14:40:54

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Callistemon21 Sun 03-Sept-23 14:41:38

Joseann

^And, of course, you can guarantee that their kids, most of whom will be in private schools, won't be affected... they will be safe, thank you very much.^
Now that is a silly thing to say. Even children of the royals are in private schools which may not be immune to crumbling concrete. It isn't just the school buildings, it is also the extensions which were added as schools expanded during this period.

Many private schools are housed in ancient buildings.

Casdon Sun 03-Sept-23 14:48:18

Callistemon21

Joseann

And, of course, you can guarantee that their kids, most of whom will be in private schools, won't be affected... they will be safe, thank you very much.
Now that is a silly thing to say. Even children of the royals are in private schools which may not be immune to crumbling concrete. It isn't just the school buildings, it is also the extensions which were added as schools expanded during this period.

Many private schools are housed in ancient buildings.

You’re right, but all those I’m aware of also have additions like science blocks, gyms etc. so I doubt if they didn’t have the issue, but as it’s been known to be a risk since 2018 you’d hope that they would have opened their coffers and got any issues sorted by now (assuming they were aware?). Unfortunately state sector schools haven’t had the luxury of being able to do that.

It looks like they have done surveys in the hospitals in Wales, I saw this morning that several are having or have had work done already.

Joseann Sun 03-Sept-23 14:57:33

Of course not, Glorianny, but in a discussion such as this about life and death situations, I wouldn't dream of pitting one group of children against another. Children are children, whoever they maybe, wherever they are educated, whatever, and their safety is paramount. Attack the politicians by all means, I'm in agreement with that, but implying that their children would be immune to upheaval and their schools automatically safe is unfair. They may very well be affected as I confirmed to Fleurpepper earlier.
But no, they wouldnt be sent home or crowded at short notice, because their schools have a team of maintenance staff on hand anyway. Oh, and they work all summer through the holidays.

JPB123 Sun 03-Sept-23 15:15:27

The government off for the whole of Summer, preening strutting nincompoops. As my Dad would say I wouldn’t pay em with washers”.
We seem to have no government anymore. I have always voted
Conservative but this last fiasco is the end. Our children’ safety
is paramount.Their education ,uninterrupted, is absolutely necessary.