Gransnet forums

News & politics

Charitable status and private schools

(364 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 30-Sept-23 08:22:05

At the moment you have the ridiculous situation where parents are having in some cases to do 3 jobs just to get food on the table or resorting to food banks to feed their children.

Their tax is subsidising parents who can afford to pay fees of on average £15000 for each child to attend school.

That isn’t morally right or fair.

MaizieD Sat 30-Sept-23 08:21:58

ronib

It would be great to have a voucher scheme which could be spent by parents to pay for state or private education. Thus enabling more children to attend private schools…… true equality?

No ronib, true equality would be the whole lot attending state schools.

Though if acceptance of your 'vouchers' were to be made obligatory ( and assuming that they are offered to all parents) it could be highly amusing to see how the private schools coped with a massive influx of bolshie disaffected children... What a shock for all those teachers who thought they had escaped the hurly burly of the state sector for the calm of the private...

Joseann Sat 30-Sept-23 08:18:44

I can understand that, but why the conclusion that it is an 'unfortunate u-turn'?

Eh? Not my comment.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 30-Sept-23 08:17:04

ronib

It would be great to have a voucher scheme which could be spent by parents to pay for state or private education. Thus enabling more children to attend private schools…… true equality?

I’m not sure you have thought this through😄😄😄

MaizieD Sat 30-Sept-23 08:15:04

Joseann

^I'm puzzled as to why this has even been deemed newsworthy^

Because MaizieD we have had thread after thread on GN with posters saying it would happen, so just setting this to right.

I can understand that, but why the conclusion that it is an 'unfortunate u-turn'?

( I thought you'd be delighted by the news...)

ronib Sat 30-Sept-23 08:12:14

It would be great to have a voucher scheme which could be spent by parents to pay for state or private education. Thus enabling more children to attend private schools…… true equality?

Joseann Sat 30-Sept-23 08:11:10

I'm puzzled as to why this has even been deemed newsworthy

Because MaizieD we have had thread after thread on GN with posters saying it would happen, so just setting this to right.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 30-Sept-23 08:07:33

As a result of Tory austerity, funding of state school pupils has dropped dramatically when compared to those children in fee paying schools, who are subsidised by the tax payer.

Labour is looking to redress this imbalance and try (AGAIN) to get the education budget back up to where it should be as it did during its last term in office.

From the IFS report.

The Labour party has proposed a package of policies to remove tax exemptions from private schools. Most importantly in revenue terms, it has proposed levying VAT on private school fees. The revenue raised would then be used to increase state school spending and would be targeted at pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds.

In 2022–23, average private school fees across the UK were £15,200 in today’s prices (net of bursaries and scholarships). This is £7,200 or nearly 90% higher than state school spending per pupil, which was £8,000 in 2022–23 (including day-to-day and capital spending). The gap between private school fees and state school spending per pupil has more than doubled since 2010, when the gap was about 40% or £3,500.

ronib Sat 30-Sept-23 08:06:00

Backtracking on pledges is not uncommon in Uk politics in these times - the electorate is becoming more aware and less believing of all politicians post Blair and BJ!
Although I think Starmer is still in the process of trying to feel out what policies are popular and will get him elected to number 10. The actual policies are unimportant.

MaizieD Sat 30-Sept-23 08:01:30

I'm not sure if Starmer's pragmatic u-turn on removing charitable status, when the objective of making them liable for VAT can be achieved without it, is as unfortunate as being a PM who supports a racist Home Secretary, u-turns on Net Zero and is prepared to write off £billions of fraudulently acquired public money (among other things.)

I'm puzzled as to why this has even been deemed newsworthy...

Freya5 Sat 30-Sept-23 07:58:44

I'm pleased about this. My non rich inlaws put their child into a private school, because the state school was c... . Bullying rife, no help, so out they came and what a difference. Massive improvement in confidence, and excellent GCSE results. Choice is paramount. Their sacrifice worth it. Let's not bring everything down to the lowest, let's up the state schools game.

Aveline Sat 30-Sept-23 07:55:20

He probably thought through the consequences of potentially thousands more children flooding the public sector schools. I think it's better to see politicians willing to change their minds in the light of further info.

Wheniwasyourage Sat 30-Sept-23 07:48:21

Apparently removing charitable status is complicated and wouldn’t necessarily make any difference, but charging VAT on fees is an easier possibility. (I read that somewhere.) I agree, anything that looks like a u-turn is unfortunate.

Joseann Fri 29-Sept-23 22:34:23

I have been abroad most of the month, but am I given to understand that Labour has dropped plans to remove charitable status from private schools?
Clearly Keir Starmer hadn't thoroughly studied the consequences of making changes to charity law which goes back centuries.
It was never going to happen, and backtracking on his pledge doesn't look good.