I can't see what the problem is with wondering what colour skin the child of a mixed race couple will have. As I have seen from friends children/grandchildren, it can be so variable, it can be so variable.
We wonder about everything else, what colour the eyes will be, or the hair, will they be as tall as their mothers family or short like their father's. In our case, will they be neurally diverse?
Yes, I am extremely sorry for the translators. One story is that they were given an early draft in mistake for the final copy and worked from that in good faith. Translators are all advised to have professional liability insurance.
This whole debacle is over such a trivial thing, just to satisfy the ego of a woman who has been given so much but always wants more. I don't see any way back for Harry; she won't let him go unless she can replace him and there aren't that many gullible multi-millionaires available. He has no position in England; he turned his back on friends and family and now they are deserting him.
That's exactly it. The revelation on the page about it being Charles comes immediately after the quotation from Meghan, "I think that that would be very harmful for them" if the name were to be revealed. You can't help to think that the two comments side by side would lead to an explosion. Someone proofreading would have noticed, well I would. (I hope I'm not deleted for showing what is the translated version here.) Ik denk dat dat .........
What I don't understand is H said he would never make the conversation public and M said it would be damaging to those responsible if their names were ever known. So why would Scobie who is clearly close enough to her if not him, to have got the 'information' to write 'Finding Freedom', risk it all by mentioning the names in any form, if she hadn't wanted him too.
Especially knowing how litigious the Sussexes are …
I suspect that 'Katie Keen' was Megan's private nickname for the Princess of Wales, No wonder Omid Scobie, thought it was a commonly used nickname for her. What other sources did he have?
What I don't understand is H said he would never make the conversation public and M said it would be damaging to those responsible if their names were ever known. So why would Scobie who is clearly close enough to her if not him, to have got the 'information' to write 'Finding Freedom', risk it all by mentioning the names in any form, if she hadn't wanted him too.