The whole of the quotation in the title is "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance" and the many demonstrations that have been mounted recently have been by groups claiming their right to exercise "eternal vigilance" about events and attitudes that they see as threats to freedoms of one kind or another. Not allowing the marches would be against the policy of allowing peaceful demonstrations and free speech.
There may be a case, though, for keeping main thoroughfares open to prevent the marches from completely paralysing the lives of the rest of the community - that does tend to lose them public sympathy anyway.
On the other hand - would that inspire the demonstrators to break the rules and take the banned routes, hoping to prove the validity of their protest by the amount of disruption they can cause?
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

