Gransnet forums

News & politics

Sir Ed Davey

(117 Posts)
Callistemon21 Sun 14-Jan-24 11:04:45

Sir Ed Davey refuses to apologise for his part in the Post Office scandal. As Postal Affairs Minister he claims to have been 'misled'.

His brother was a partner in HSF, the firm hired to relentlessly fight the litigation brought by the sub postmasters and postmistresses in 2019.

When Ed Davey lost his seat at the 2015 General Election, he accepted a lucrative consultancy with HSF, and after winning back his seat in 2017, he accepted £275,000 from HSF in addition to his parliamentary salary, before quitting in January 2022 after criticism of MPs having second jobs.

So while sub-postmasters fought for justice, the former Postal Affairs Minister was working for a firm helping the Post Office deny them justice.

He received a knighthood for his public and political service in 2015.

Should Ed Davey now resign and a new leader be appointed well before a General Election this year? I ask this as someone who has voted Liberal then Liberal Democratic many times over the years but feel let down yet again.

icanhandthemback Mon 15-Jan-24 12:09:22

Anniebach

A former Postmistress is to stand against him at next general election.

I do hope she wins!

Grantanow Mon 15-Jan-24 12:04:58

My OH is a Lib Dem member and is appalled by Davey. He should resign, hand back his gong and donate his HSF earnings to the victims. And not stand for re-election.

petra Mon 15-Jan-24 11:45:56

Did anyone listen to the ongoing piece on Radio 4 this morning.
Just when you think your blood cant boil any hotter, it does 😡
If Tony Blair had listened to Gordon Brown all those years ago we wouldn’t be where we are now.

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000jfyv

MaizieD Mon 15-Jan-24 11:42:11

Callistemon21

He's not the only politician to have ignored this and sided with Post Office officials
But he is the only politician to have worked for his brother's firm of lawyers, HSF, from 2015 to 2022, which advised the Post Office in its fight against the subpostmasters and subpostmistresses in court cases.

Is there any evidence that he was directly involved in giving this advice?

I can't believe that he would refuse to apologise if he had been directly involved or absolutely aware of this involvement by his brother's firm. After all, some of the really guilty parties are falling over themselves to apologise.

It makes no sense at all that an experienced politician would refuse to apologise, unless they genuinely and absolutely believed that they had done nothing to be associated with the persecution of the SPMs.

I'm not a huge fan of guilt by association...

orly Mon 15-Jan-24 11:35:39

He's always the first to demand resignation from others doing impropriety so he should follow his own advice

Anniebach Mon 15-Jan-24 11:34:50

A former Postmistress is to stand against him at next general election.

Granra2 Mon 15-Jan-24 10:18:47

Typical politician- do as I say not as I do.

Callistemon21 Mon 15-Jan-24 10:16:21

He's not the only politician to have ignored this and sided with Post Office officials
But he is the only politician to have worked for his brother's firm of lawyers, HSF, from 2015 to 2022, which advised the Post Office in its fight against the subpostmasters and subpostmistresses in court cases.

Bella23 Mon 15-Jan-24 10:07:03

His conscience should tell him what to do without others having to spell it out. I think this reflects the type of person he is.

Grantanow Mon 15-Jan-24 09:54:04

There is an interesting article about Davey relating to the PO scandal in the Mail Online. I have no idea if it is factually correct. See
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12957971/ed-davey-postmasters-horizon-post-office-scandal.html

Callistemon21 Sun 14-Jan-24 21:20:07

winterwhite

The question I asked was:

Should Ed Davey now resign and a new leader be appointed well before a General Election this year?

If you think he should not resign you are perfectly entitled to say so.

Callistemon21 Sun 14-Jan-24 20:41:40

That was to winterwhite

Callistemon21 Sun 14-Jan-24 20:41:07

🤔

They're not.

Why would you ask that? There are threads about other people involved too, others named.

If a General Election is approaching, surely we need the leader of a political party to answer questions on their role in this scandal?

If you have questions of others, feel free to start threads.
I'm sure posters, including me, will be interested.

Casdon Sun 14-Jan-24 20:39:18

I’ve just watched this. Ian Hislop gets very annoyed, but he has it I think.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuNjMs2BxEs

winterwhite Sun 14-Jan-24 20:35:00

Why is on

“Why is sorry such a difficult word to say?” Is not really the main question, Callistemon. A more pertinent one would be Why is only one person being called upon to say it?

Callistemon21 Sun 14-Jan-24 20:24:39

But why is Sorry such a difficult word to say?

Galaxy Sun 14-Jan-24 20:02:21

I spent some time involved with the lib dems varian whilst labour went through its phase of not wanting to win elections. I was able to form some opinions of the party during that time.
I have pointed this out many times but large sections of the population are now not getting information from the MSM, the influence of the telegraph etc is waning, I am not sure that the this has dawned on the MSM yet.
One of the first points I made on the thread about the PO was that decisions made in reaction to public anger are rarely good decisions I am not for example going to join in the cheering on of ITV just yet until I am more clear why the previous CEO of the post office didnt get much attention in their broadcast. I actually dont particularly want Daveys head (mainly because I would worry layla moran would replace him) but it's not a witch hunt to ask some questions and the label lib dem or labour does not automatically mean they are one of the goodies.

Farzanah Sun 14-Jan-24 19:23:51

He’s undoubtedly a scapegoat. These things are always political.

fancythat Sun 14-Jan-24 19:20:06

What about the HSF part?

varian Sun 14-Jan-24 19:14:19

I don't think it is anything to do with his employment as a solicitor (his profession before entering parliament). It is just a reflection of the bias of our media.(80% + right wing)

"Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey has hit out at the Post Office's "conspiracy of lies" as he lays out his intention to quash the convictions of those affected by the Horizon scandal.

Davey has faced questions over his role in the scandal after working as Post Office minister in David Cameron's government between 2010 and 2012.

He accused the Post Office of lying to him and other ministers over the matter which has resulted in Rishi Sunak unveiling primary legislation that will exonerate wrongfully convicted sub-postmasters.

"They told me the same thing", he said.

"The Horizon system was working and there weren't many sub-postmasters involved. It was clearly a conspiracy of lies.

"What has become clear is, the Post Office were lying to the sub-postmasters, lying to victims, lying to courts and judges, lying to ministers of all parties over two decades."

www.gbnews.com/news/ed-davey-post-office-conviction-postmasters

So why did GB News, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, and the rest of the right wing media try to lay all the blame at the door of Ed Davey, who oversaw the PO only two years of the twenty five years that this scandal has continued?

Casdon Sun 14-Jan-24 19:10:35

prestbury

Casdon

prestbury

Is there something about the past and current leaders of the Liberal Democrats that makes them hate post office workers.

Vince Cable - oversaw the breakup of the Royal Mail into privatised Royal Mail and public owned Post Office, Ed Davey - Postal Minester 2010 t0 2012 and Jo Swinson -Postal Minister from 2012 to 2015. Surely they cannot all have missed the signals. LD members have also been asked to deflect any questions while electioneering .

Has it occurred to you that these people were handed a known to be poisoned chalice in a coalition government? I’m not a Lib Dem supporter, but my first thought was that they were shafted.

At the time of their appontment, their leader was Deputy Prime Minister, I wonder what part he played in their appointments of the "poisoned chalice".

I think the Lib Dem’s in the coalition government were guilty of - naivety. I agree with varian regarding singling out the Lib Dem’s who were involved specifically, it looks like a deliberate smear campaign. It’s not a coincidence that this is an election year.
Having said that, I do think Ed Davey would have gained more respect if he’d said sorry - as would all those involved.

MaizieD Sun 14-Jan-24 19:03:03

varian

So, if you haven't been exposed to any anti-LibDem propaganda,how can you explain why you would want to point the finger of blame at Ed Davey. rather than any of the other 19 ministers who were responsible for the Post Office since 1999?

I was wondering about this, varian. After all, he's the only one of the 20 ministers who actually met Alan Bates...

I think it's the association with his brother's firm which is swinging the witch hunters against him.

I wonder who they're going to turn on once they've hounded Davey out of office?

varian Sun 14-Jan-24 18:37:09

So, if you haven't been exposed to any anti-LibDem propaganda,how can you explain why you would want to point the finger of blame at Ed Davey. rather than any of the other 19 ministers who were responsible for the Post Office since 1999?

Galaxy Sun 14-Jan-24 18:26:09

I know none of us can think for ourselves, you are the only one capable of that. Oh and I havent read any of the right wing press coverage of this issue.

varian Sun 14-Jan-24 17:58:21

Especially as Ed Davey was one of the very few Post Office Ministers who took action?

It is so depressing to see how easily so many people allow their views to be manipulated by the right wing press.