TerriBull
Yes it's true that catholic girls and women were expected to cover their heads, but that was kicked into the long grass long ago. It's much easier to kick over the traces having been born a catholic than it was a generation or so ago, even in Ireland, in fact particularly in Ireland they are not the meek malleable adherents they once were. The church shot itself in the foot over their prevarications and cover ups of wrong doings. Yet another large body inhabited by a disproportionate number of miscreants. Although when I say that I do hear my late mother say "the majority of people in the church are good" that may well be the case, but once a reputation has been tarnished, it's hard to get the trust back, particularly when the hierarchy don't do enough to rectify and acknowledge past wrongs and that applies to so many sectors in life.
Turning to head coverings on women, well of course it's up to them and ok if they can make an informed choice to wear the hijab without pressure. I did find it very regrettable to see a column of very little girls with hijabs, certainly no more than five years old. file into a theatre production of The Gruffalo some years ago when I took my granddaughter. If female hair, as it is in many patriarchal religions deemed to represent some sort of temptation then covering up infants for that purpose is very, very sad imo.
In any case men should really be the ones to cover their heads, they are more likely to lose their hair than women Surely God's nature's way of indicating that to leave their scalp uncovered is to risk possible skin cancer, just saying!
Another good post, Terribul.
On the matter of what-women-wear and whether it's by choice or not, it's difficult to talk about the freedom of that choice if, for example, you have been brought up in a culture which deems it desirable to cover up in the interests of modesty.
As GSM points out - she still feels uncomfortable going into a church without covering head. Brought up to cover my head in church, and now an atheist - so do I. It's not easy to shrug off the culture in which you were raised, if it has been an accepted, 'done' way of life.
Modesty is not a bad characteristic - obviously in some situations it's essential. But it's a trait that should apply to men equally. Having seen wealthy Muslim families (tourists?) in the West End (well, two, to be entirely factual) - the women completely covered from head to toe whilst the men parade around in tight designer jeans and equally tight t shirts, you do have to question the whole concept of 'modesty'. Not an everyday sight, I know - but I have seen it, as have others. And it's also at odds with the modest shalwar kameez worn by men in some regions of southern and central Asia.
IMO the root of this problem is men - or should I say those men who are afraid of an educated woman, those men who regard their womenfolk as possessions; who appear to believe that women are Jezebels sent to tempt them who must be banished from society - kept largely in the home. We had one in my extended family like that... no wife of mine is ever going out to work (or words to that effect). He was on a good wage and didn't want anyone to think that his wife had to work when in fact, she wanted to, wanted to be independent - and the thought of her independence terrified him (so said the rest of the family). I think it's time men were emancipated - from their fragile egos.