Iam64
Dickens, your summary is accurate. He was twice refused asylum and in 2018 convicted of a sexual assault and indecent exposer, both of which he pleaded guilty to. He was given a suspended sentence. His application for asylum was granted in 2020. If he’d been sentenced to two years for the sexual offences he would not have been granted asylum. It’s the length of the sentence, nit the seriousness of the crime.
I’m not hang n flog as my posts show but - sex offenders remain a danger. We know nothing about the type of offence but his guilty plea suggests to me his lawyer knew a guilty finding inevitable. I’d be surprised if he wasn’t advised to go guilty and avoid a trial that would have led to a more (sensible) serious sentence.
Thanks for the clarification Iam64 - with the media, I'm never quite sure whether I'm reading the facts.
His application for asylum was granted in 2020. If he’d been sentenced to two years for the sexual offences he would not have been granted asylum. It’s the length of the sentence, nit the seriousness of the crime.
There's a couple of troubling issues here, for me (and I suspect others, too).
Presumably, the length of a sentence is supposed to reflect its severity? And this individual was given a suspended sentence - again presumably - because he pleaded guilty to the offences.
So the lawyer is earning his bread by doing his job - irrespective of what he personally thinks or feels about his client - which is how it works.
And the Law allows for a sentence to be suspended, assuming the defendant and society will be better served by it.
This principle doesn't always bode well for women does it (regardless of the status of the defendant)? Sexual offences might be a 'one-off', or they might well be part of a more serious personality disorder (for want of a better word). Of course, I can't speculate on this particular case because it's ongoing.
However, this individual was refused his claim for asylum twice - there must have been a valid reason... what invalidated it so that it was overturned? Rhetorical questions.
There's a huge backlash against asylum seekers and immigrants in our society, and we are very divided on the matter. I don't want to be part of either camp. I don't believe asylum seekers are all rapists or medieval terrorists, nor do I think they are all genuinely seeking asylum from war or persecution. I want a government that deals with the matter openly and honestly - and efficiently, because refugees are a problem for the whole of Europe and one that is not going to just 'go away'.
Is the EU's Migration Deal pact working?
I really hope this man is caught very soon. He's desperate and dangerous. I keep thinking about his poor victim who now has life-changing injuries. In a matter of seconds, her life has changed forever. And God only knows how the trauma will affect her two children. It seems their injuries are not quite as bad as thought at first, thank goodness.