This is long as I have answered questions previously posted.
To foxie48:
'As the months go by and more information becomes available with regard to the treatment, deaths etc of Palestinians, has this changed anyone's opinion?'
Your question is the assumption that treatment, deaths and treatment of Palestinians are deliberate and not caused during an act of war in which the Palestinian people have been held as hostages by their own and used as protection.
'Today evidence of the treatment of doctors and patients in the Nasser Hospital has been verified. Does this change your opinion?'
It is difficult to know what to believe but I do know that the medical staff from Palestinian hospitals when interviewed by foreign news companies have HAD to tell lies. They are controlled, like everyone else, by Hamas. Much of what has been said to camera by doctors in untrue. Can you think of any country that bases its command centres and personnel under a hospital?
To 'Vintagewhine':
The information I gave came from a trusted source who has no reason to lie. Much information one reads in the UK press is distorted or downright lies but then no one wants to read anything positive, do they?
To Whitewavemark2:
“Al Shifa hospital is the Gaza strips largest and most advanced medical facility, and has been operating for over 70 years. And now Israel has completely destroyed it.”
Yes, the al Shifa was a large hospital, although anything they could not handle, was sent to Israel's hospitals where patients were treated, free of charge, just as if they were an Israeli. Now, please ask yourself why Israel would want to destroy a hospital? Would it give them good PR? Or, could it be that there were over 1,000 Hamas operatives embedded in the tunnels underneath with not a thought for the sick patients above.
To Whitewavemark2
'Netanyahu’s days are clearly numbered - it can’t come soon enough imo.'
You are probably correct. Netanyahu is not popular and yet, a strong leader is necessary to cope with the pressure from around the world, trying to make Israel surrender during a war they did start. If the US has asked the UK to stop bombing German civilians during WW11, would we?
To Wyllow3
'May I ask a question? Do you support the armed occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in 1967 by the then Israeli government?
Much of what is happening now dates from those actions.'
Yes. In 1967 it was well known that Egypt was about to stage war on Israel. The pre-emptive strike was necessary. Think of Russia with miles of tanks by the Ukrainian border. Perhaps if, after that knowledge, Ukraine had acted first, less damage would have occurred to Ukrainian civilians.
To silverlining 48
'Candelle you mention rockets fired by Hamas into Israel but these are presumably diverted by superior Israeli weaponry before doing any damage but if you know, how many Israeli civilians have been killed by Hamas since /after 8 October? I would guess few but unlike the Palestinian numbers it is never reported. Every person who dies in war is a tragedy but it highlights the power and wealth imbalance between the two.'
The fact that Israel has superior defence systems does not negate the fact that they are under attack from many different sides. I do not have up to date figures of Israel civilian deaths but there are some daily. The terror of rockets raining down and disruption to life (having to run to shelters, sometimes three or more times day OR night) takes its toll on innocent people.
I have mentioned previously that one cannot believe much that comes from a war zone. Obviously tens of thousands of poor Palestinian people have been killed: that it purely and simply down to Hamas operating in the cities, schools and hospitals. I cannot think of any other country where this has been the norm and so many civilians have been harmed. Yet, apparently this is Israel's fault. It is not. Israel values life. Please do not forget that the Palestinian people are brought up to hate Israel and Jewish people.
'Every person who dies in war is a tragedy but it highlights the power and wealth imbalance between the two.'
I agree, every death is awful but is the wealth balance between the two relevant? Israel was a pile of sand but has evolved, with hard work into a viable democracy. There is much corruption in other countries and money that should have reached the Palestinians has not. This is not Israel's fault, is it?
You mention how the Palestinians are living in rubble with little food or water. Please understand that Hamas controls food and water in Palestine. Have you thought that Hamas, well prepared for war, took absolutely no steps to feed their population whom they knew would be forced to evacuate from areas. No preparations for them at all (except in the higher echelons, where their villas are still standing etc.) The Palestinian population is just fodder to their leaders and great PR world-wide. All the money that has been pumped in to Palestine has never reached the general populace, instead it has been creamed off.
I have not even mentioned that there is almost no aid to the Palestinian people from all the unbelievably wealthy Arab nations that practically surround Israel.
Why does Egypt not open their border to the Palestinians?
I have in the past asked questions which are not answered: why is there so much support for Palestine, an aggressor, whilst meanwhile 750,00 deaths have occurred in Syria? Answers, anyone?
If not Syria, how about Somalia or Sudan or Yemen. Could it be that the Israeli people are Jewish? Please, someone prove me wrong.