growstuff
Incidentally, I am well aware of the difference between picking up a few words in a foreign language and being a fluent or (near) fluent speaker. I also know about understanding forms in a foreign language.
What's the point of this? Whatever their language skills, these fraudsters aren't stupid and somehow or other had understand the loopholes in the claiming benefits, which would mean having a good grasp of information requested on forms.
What's the point of this? Whatever their language skills, these fraudsters aren't stupid and somehow or other had understand the loopholes in the claiming benefits, which would mean having a good grasp of information requested on forms.
When I first arrived in Norway to take on a new job - I didn't speak Norwegian - but fairly quickly learned to navigate the company's in-house systems and computers, and began to 'grasp' the language. So you are right - you absorb what you need to know - only in my case of course it was legit.
Another poster on here (forgot who) lived in Bulgaria so will know the prevalence of English-speaking natives. I only visited the country, briefly, but found quite a few who appeared to have a basic grasp of English.
Don't the DWP deal with those who are not native English speaking individuals anyway - presumably they are used to the possible incorrect grammar or speech if they are communicating verbally?
If these criminals are intent on fraud and know how to find loopholes, I don't think a lack of fluent English would be too much of an obstacle. I sometimes have to complete forms for the Norwegian and Swedish authorities, when I'm stuck, Google Translate is a great help. Where there's a will there's a way and these bloody criminals certainly have the will.