Gransnet forums

News & politics

Another Tired Kicking For The Sick And Disabled By Rishi

(269 Posts)
mae13 Sat 20-Apr-24 01:32:43

Well done our un-elected PM: going after the low-hanging fruit yet again, flagging up the worn-out rhetoric about the sick, disabled and mentally unstable not REALLY being sick, disabled or mentally unstable because he knows for certain that they are the traditional bunch of workshy scroungers. Being a billionaire gives him the authority to get on his high-horse and point an accusing finger.

He really is too desperate to get a vote by any means......sod the fact that his judgemental scare tactics generate terrifying levels of stress among the vulnerable who are dependent on measly benefits and have unbelievable circumstances to deal with already.

What an appalling example of a human being he is.

keepingquiet Sun 28-Apr-24 20:42:19

MOnica- as someone who has experience of how local press works I know they can 'twist' a story to give a different perspective and very often once in print there is little you can do.

There are some left-wing national newspapers of course but they are still in the minority and I wouldn't include the Observer although I don't buy or read newspapers anymore for the reasons I have outlined above.

Local news and papers are really only for advertising these days. I don't read them or listen for the same reason- so even if they were full of distressing stories like these I wouldn't get to hear or read about them.

I do find it frustrating to read posts on here that take a similar partisan approach- that all claimants are scroungers or victims. I do believe there is an over reliance on the media in influencing people's opinions and this post seemed genuine and from a place of honesty which you rarely see in the media these days.

M0nica Sun 28-Apr-24 18:50:41

keepingquiet Are you including The Observer, Guardian and Daily Mirror among your rightwing newspapers?

Locaal papers and local radio are also interested in such stories. They occur regularly in our local media.

Wyllow3 Sun 28-Apr-24 18:32:40

I would support you going to the press it should be told! except he is so vulnerable xx

Iam64 Sun 28-Apr-24 18:22:50

veejay, your post really highlights the cruelty and inefficiency in the system.
I grumbled earlier thst in the course if work I did meet some clever, deliberate slivers. Your post made me want to stress that the majority of people I came across needed their benefits whether sickness or unemployment.
I don’t want to rush into problem solving because I’m sure you’re doing everything you can. Sometimes your MP can assist
I wish I could actually Do Something - it’s a disgrace

zakouma66 Sun 28-Apr-24 17:12:35

veejay, sorry to hear this experience , which I'm sure is being replicated up and down the land.

veejay Sun 28-Apr-24 17:07:41

Sorry for typos was trying not to lose post again

keepingquiet Sun 28-Apr-24 17:02:33

I wouldn't blame you for going to the press, but as most of them are in the pay of right-wing government supporters I wouldn't expect too much support there either.

I think you have been very courageous posting this and sincerely hope you get the right help for your son without this humiliating and degrading treatment.

I hope people on here constantly slagging off benefit 'scroungers' will realise that this is not an isolated story, but more common than you would think.

Much easier to blame those at the bottom, than those at the top who have consistently brought in the legislation that results in this kind of emotional difficulty and stress.

I really hope someone can help.

MissAdventure Sun 28-Apr-24 16:58:40

I've made this point over and over again.

People seem to think that someone saunters into the job centre, hands out, and is given lots of money for them to spend.

It does not work like that. Basically, you are hounded, at the beck and call of the dwp and made to jump through whatever hoops are put in front of you.

veejay Sun 28-Apr-24 16:53:03

I wrote a long post which I have lost somehow
I will do again but briefly now
My son is being hounded
like many others possibly by the dwp
He is recovering from a stroke
Last year shortly after his stroke he was contacted for a capability for work assessment
He was left with no speech.just gibberish really.but slowly improving.weakness in arms but mainly legs
Had to send in 4 months bank accounts whic of course he couldn't do
we got help The dwp say they are only checking bank accounts where fraud is suspected.not true.they are targeting vulnerable and disabled
My son has been rushed into hospital twice within 3 weeks due to life threatening low potassium
He is very ill
Yesterday a letter came.to me as his appointee for him for another capability for work assessment
by phone they have already had proof about his stroke and extreme anxiety among other problems like squashed vertebrae
I can't even tell him as the last assessment stressed him so much he was feeling suicidal and stopped eating and hardly slept
This was what adequate him ill and ended up being rushed to hospital
He is very ill dangerously low in potassium and magnesium and told he is in danger of a cardiac arrest
What more proof do they want
We have sent all proof last time and things are much worse
If he doesn't do the assessment it's with the threat of losing his Univerdal credit
I contacted my zmp last time and also Mel Stride.minister for the dwp then
Nit sure if he still is
He and my mp must have got contacted dwp because they rang me and told me
They said not to worry it was sorted.obviously not
I am so angry I feel I am thinking of going to the press
It's disgusting who they are targeting

JaneJudge Tue 23-Apr-24 21:23:57

I haven’t read the whole thread so I apologise if I am repeating anyone but the lowest paid jobs in health, social care and education often minimum wage or slightly above require thorough background checks which often take months. So some people may have to wait for employment they have been offered

Dickens Tue 23-Apr-24 19:53:47

growstuff

Germanshepherdsmum

Thanks growstuff.

The thing is that somebody who does reach the earnings threshold will exceed the limit for UC. He/she will only receive UC if there is rent to pay and children to support.

For people who are married or living together, it's the family income which counts, so if one of a couple becomes unemployed, it's very likely that UC won't be paid.

It all seems so complex - in terms of the administration of the various entitlements, etc... so many different layers and schemes. Which I guess are necessary to take into account individual circumstances.

I wonder how much it all costs?

growstuff Tue 23-Apr-24 19:09:07

Germanshepherdsmum

Thanks growstuff.

The thing is that somebody who does reach the earnings threshold will exceed the limit for UC. He/she will only receive UC if there is rent to pay and children to support.

For people who are married or living together, it's the family income which counts, so if one of a couple becomes unemployed, it's very likely that UC won't be paid.

growstuff Tue 23-Apr-24 19:05:17

Germanshepherdsmum

That doesn’t sound very realistic! There’s only so much time you can spend looking for a job, surely. How do you prove how much time you’ve spent looking for a job?

You can't. I did this during Covid. I used to fill in my journal and say I'd spent x hours scouring certain websites (gave links) and had applied for y jobs (sent copies of forms or application letters). Sent results of applications. As this was during Covid, there weren't exactly many opportunities. I also wrote about improving my Zoom and Teams skills, so that I could set up my business online (it was all previously face-to-face). If it hadn't been during the pandemic, I would have been expected to walk round town and deliver my CV to anywhere even remotely likely to have a job.

All the above was slightly ridiculous because I was months off claiming my state pension and nobody would have wanted to employ me because I'd stated very clearly I didn't want to work beyond SPA. An advisor used to ring me occasionally and once suggested I looked at courses to enhance my skills. He even laughed when I said that I'd be retired before the end of any course.

Unless the Jobcentre has lists of employers who will accept the unemployed, it's all a bit of a waste of time.

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 23-Apr-24 18:59:35

Thanks growstuff.

growstuff Tue 23-Apr-24 18:55:03

Germanshepherdsmum

Are those capable of full time work only required to search for 16 hours a week of work? That equates to three hours a day. And then presumably they still claim UC if they are doing a part time minimum wage? That’s dreadful.

No, they're required to look for work which pays a minimum (can't remember how much), which equates to about 24 hours on minimum wage.

growstuff Tue 23-Apr-24 18:53:38

Theexwife

Cossy

Btw the 16 hour rule does NOT apply under UC and anyone on PAYE simply cannot play the system any more as there is a direct feed from HMRC every month into UC. It’s the amount you earn not the hours worked.

For every pound you earn UC goes down by 55p so for many it is still worth working only 16 hours. Claimants of UC are only required to look for work for 16 hours a week.

But "16 hours" is irrelevant.

Theoretically, somebody earning £300 an hour for one hour's work a week (and some people do) wouldn't be required to look for work.

growstuff Tue 23-Apr-24 18:51:34

Cossy

Btw the 16 hour rule does NOT apply under UC and anyone on PAYE simply cannot play the system any more as there is a direct feed from HMRC every month into UC. It’s the amount you earn not the hours worked.

Thank you for confirming that. I thought that was the case. It's different for self-employed, who (I think) are assumed to be earning the threshold.

MissAdventure Tue 23-Apr-24 18:50:23

By filling in an online journal which shows applications, responses, company names and so on.

You're also required to attend courses, job clubs and whatever else is decided for you.
I wouldn't know, because I'd rather gouge my eyes out with a rusty stick than "live it up" on benefit payments for any longer than is purely necessary.

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 23-Apr-24 18:42:05

That doesn’t sound very realistic! There’s only so much time you can spend looking for a job, surely. How do you prove how much time you’ve spent looking for a job?

Dickens Tue 23-Apr-24 18:41:57

Germanshepherdsmum

Are those capable of full time work only required to search for 16 hours a week of work? That equates to three hours a day. And then presumably they still claim UC if they are doing a part time minimum wage? That’s dreadful.

I think the problem for some is that if they are doing the type of job that does not guarantee set hours, they have difficulty in finding another that fits in with it.

This is a problem a friend's daughter has. She has managed to secure a part-time job with regular hours - but has been offered other work where she has to be available when the employer wants her - which frequently conflicts with the times she's already working. And I think this is part of the problem for some in the labour market today (ultimately, she wants a full-time job suited to her qualifications, but has not been able to secure one).

Work has changed so much. When I was unemployed in the 70s, it was only for one week, because there were so many jobs on offer... full-time, with reasonable salaries. I started 'temping' which ultimately led to a prestigious job in a fantastic company.

MissAdventure Tue 23-Apr-24 18:31:33

If a person isn't working, they will be expected to spend 35 hours a week job hunting, and to submit proof of doing so.

MissAdventure Tue 23-Apr-24 18:29:21

If you are able and available to work
You will need to do everything you reasonably can to give yourself the best chance of finding work. You will be expected to spend the number of hours agreed on your claimant commitment preparing for and getting a job. If you do not do this without a good reason you may receive a sanction.

If you currently have limited capability for work, related to a disability or health condition, but this is expected to change over time.

You will be supported until your circumstances improve and you can work. You will be expected to prepare for work so far as you are able.

This is from the gov.uk website.

Germanshepherdsmum Tue 23-Apr-24 16:55:49

Are those capable of full time work only required to search for 16 hours a week of work? That equates to three hours a day. And then presumably they still claim UC if they are doing a part time minimum wage? That’s dreadful.

Theexwife Tue 23-Apr-24 12:12:34

Cossy

Btw the 16 hour rule does NOT apply under UC and anyone on PAYE simply cannot play the system any more as there is a direct feed from HMRC every month into UC. It’s the amount you earn not the hours worked.

For every pound you earn UC goes down by 55p so for many it is still worth working only 16 hours. Claimants of UC are only required to look for work for 16 hours a week.

zakouma66 Tue 23-Apr-24 10:07:46

How do people on here know about thousands and thousands of people who are invisible? Trapped at home, no networks , no nothing.

Still if it makes you feel better to attack the weak and vulnerable, so be it.