Gransnet forums

News & politics

What immediate changes will the new Labour government make?

(253 Posts)
Kandinsky Sun 23-Jun-24 08:32:24

Assuming they win ( which is 99% likely )
What improvements are we likely to see within their first year in office?

Whitewavemark2 Mon 24-Jun-24 11:34:59

I read this morning that labours plans for housing is quite advanced.

Planning is one major area of reform.

Cossy Mon 24-Jun-24 11:46:42

Firstly, I’m certainly not counting my chickens about who’ll be in “power” on July 5th, secondly whomever it is, nothing radical can happen as without raising taxes to the absolute hilt for us all, which most of us do NOT want nor can afford, (if it was a few pence per £, I’d be fine with this), everything else in their plans (and all the other parties) needs time, many years, and some money.

I’ve read all the manifesto’s, cannot take Tories seriously as they’ve had their chance to put things right, Reform and Green are fiscal suicide, I don’t have an issue with LibDems or Labour, but at this juncture I’m simply waiting to see.

staceygrove Mon 24-Jun-24 11:48:17

Tax our pensions for one thing

orly Mon 24-Jun-24 11:51:55

I don't expect anything to change. It's all aspirations but there will be no delivery - so no change at all.

Nelli123 Mon 24-Jun-24 12:07:11

Vintagewhine

It seems an age ago but I do remember when we last had a labour government and there's little doubt that services were better and taxes were lower overall. I can't remember much sleaze either. It was after the Tories imploded the last time with different factions fighting amongst themselves instead of running the country. They sold off council houses, sold us shares in services we already owned allowing individuals to make massive profits instead of improving infrastructure and decimated whole areas of the country creating even more need for levelling up. Tbh the mood in the country was very much like it is now! Definitely time to give labour another chance to improve things.

That may have been the case, but it was all on the never-never. I suppose people have forgotten the huge debt the country was in due to excessive borrowing. I know things have got even worse since then, a lot of which is the result of the pandemic, furlough, etc. Remember the note Liam Burne, chief secretary to the Treasury under Gordon Brown, left for his successor ? "I'm afraid there is no money!" Also, Gordon Brown sold most of our gold reserves for a pittance! People seem to forget that it's exactly these reasons that drove the UK to austerity measures. It was either that or even more borrowing.

Nannapat1 Mon 24-Jun-24 12:07:38

I can't think of any improvements, either because they won't happen, or because I don't regard them as improvements.

Siope Mon 24-Jun-24 12:14:15

People seem to forget that it's exactly these reasons that drove the UK to austerity measures

On the contrary. The economy was growing again towards the end of Brown’s tenure, and austerity - which was a purely political choice, designed to shrink the public sector and state support for those in need - choked off that growth.

Debt has increased under the Tories as the attached graph (from statista.com, but widely available) shows.

knspol Mon 24-Jun-24 12:16:26

Higher taxes, and increased immigration and borrowing. People who have worked hard and saved will be hit in the pocket and the super rich will still find ways to bypass the rules and pay less tax than the ordinary working man. Increased class sizes as a result of the VAT on private school fees so education will suffer and can they be trusted with the security of the country?

SaxonGrace Mon 24-Jun-24 12:23:38

If you have your own home or a pension you have worked for then they are going to sting you, hopefully this time they won’t take us into any illegal wars

Susieb4605 Mon 24-Jun-24 12:27:02

I cannot believe that you have no clue there is nothing to choose between any of them all corrupt and don’t know fact from fiction it’s a very sad time for us all I don’t think we even qualify for 3rd world status our NHS is absolutely appalling until we actually pay proper money into it and actually pay to see a doctor and fine time wasters who just never bother to turn up nothing will change. There is no care in the community and sadly lacking in our hospitals not enough staff and the ones who are there are frazzled most doing their best and a handful not so

Bluesmum Mon 24-Jun-24 12:27:16

I personally really cannot believe Labour will win the election, but if they do, I predict Starmer will last three minths as leader before someone from the hard left takes over, thenHeaven help us all!!! Immigration and taxes will increase dramatically, borrowing will increase, we will be back to being ruled by Brussels, the Unions will become all powerful again and local services will be decimated, then you will all wish you had voted conservative, like me!

Grantanow Mon 24-Jun-24 12:28:22

If I were Starmer I'd tear up the manifesto and raise my vision to make changes good for the next 75 years, especially for the NHS and social care. He's going to have a very good majority and he should think like Clem Attlee, not tinker at the edges.

MaizieD Mon 24-Jun-24 12:46:53

That may have been the case, but it was all on the never-never. I suppose people have forgotten the huge debt the country was in due to excessive borrowing. I know things have got even worse since then, a lot of which is the result of the pandemic, furlough, etc. Remember the note Liam Burne, chief secretary to the Treasury under Gordon Brown, left for his successor ? "I'm afraid there is no money!" Also, Gordon Brown sold most of our gold reserves for a pittance! People seem to forget that it's exactly these reasons that drove the UK to austerity measures. It was either that or even more borrowing.

Goodness, so much nonsense to unpick here.

Firstly.

If it hadn't been for Brown and his Chancellor, Darling, rescuing the UK banks by instructing the Bank of England to create the money to buy bonds and so put £billions into bank reserves, a good many of the UK population would have found their bank accounts empty because the banks didn't have enough in their reserves to cover the deposits held with them.

This action was approved of world wide as avoiding that calamity. Also, they gave a guarantee that is still in force, that if a bank failed any customers' deposits with that bank up to the value of £85,000 would be restored to them by the government.

Secondly.

Gold reserves are irrelevant. Our currency isn't backed by gold reserves; it hasn't been since the early 1970s when the 'gold standard' was abandoned internationally. Selling them made no difference to anything.

Thirdly.

As has been pointed out, over and over and over again, Liam Byrne's note was a JOKE. It was a joke with a quite long tradition, former chancellors or treasury ministers have done much the same in the past. The UK cannot run out of money because it creates its own currency.

Fourthly.

Government 'borrowing' is the government provision of a safe savings facility for institutions and individuals. It is absolutely safe because the government will always pay the interest on you principle, or repay your principle on demand. That is why pension funds hold so much government 'debt'. It is guaranteed its return. If the government didn't provide this facility the funds would have to make far more risky investments.

If the government were to suddenly repay all its 'debt' there would be so much money returned to the economy that hyperinflation would be absolutely guaranteed. Not a good situation to be in...

Do you have a NS&I savings account, or Premium bonds? They are part of 'government borrowing'. Would you want the government to return the money in your savings account to you, or the money you invested in Premium bonds?

The more pertinent question about government borrowing would be 'What has the government spent it on'? Because the state of the UK at the moment indicates clearly that they haven't been spending it on our public services...

OTOH, the money the government created to cover the pandemic seems to have created several more millionaires and billionaires. Is that where it went? Into the pockets of their friends and donors? hmm

Annierob Mon 24-Jun-24 12:47:50

First thing is NHS. Wes Streetly intends speaking to medical staff and dentists with the aim of retention and also having more NHS dentists. Labour Party intends reducing medical waiting lists especially for scans by using private facilities.
Also, they want to see the economic state of the country so then they can see if they can start build social housing and ensuring enough teachers in schools
So much to do.

Iam64 Mon 24-Jun-24 12:58:50

Eh Up Grantanow— you’ll be steeping the fear and terror some feel at the prospect of a Labour Govt. I’m sure the dissenters will continue to try to undermine Starmer from within but the moderate majority is back

Beesh Mon 24-Jun-24 12:58:53

Rachel Reeves has said that VAT on private school fees will be in her first budget but not imposed until 2025 and won’t be collected retrospectively

Mamie Mon 24-Jun-24 13:09:43

I always think the re-hashing of the Liam Byrne note incident should be accompanied by the original Reggie Maudling note left for the incoming Labour government.
"Good luck, old cock, sorry to leave it in such a mess".

Beau1958 Mon 24-Jun-24 13:11:05

What people tend to forget is the mess Labour left us in 12 years ago. It just goes round in circles.

pooohbear2811 Mon 24-Jun-24 13:12:30

sadly I thnk we are going to get a very low turnout as some people are thinking along the mentality of " they are all as bad as each other" and other sentiments and don't know who to vote for.
I think mass apathy is going to do a lot of damage.

Iam64 Mon 24-Jun-24 13:13:50

You can’t seriously compare the country the tories inherited with the one we live in now

vegansrock Mon 24-Jun-24 13:14:34

So much project fear on here - straight out of the right wing media playbook- as if we didnt currently have crumbling public services, highest taxation since WW2 , increased immigration - all under the Tories - and people are voting for more of the same? Anyone voting Tory must be wealthy or dim in my opinion. As for Corbyn being pm- totally ridiculous - remember we have had 5 Tory PMs and countless ministerial changes so it’s not as if they have been strong and stable. Starmer could be accused of being like a kindly but strict headmaster who isn’t the most exciting character, but at least he doesn’t have that whiff of posh boy sleaze that surrounds many of the current talentless Tory crop . Plus where’s the £350 m a week for the NHS and the 40 new hospitals?

Pammie1 Mon 24-Jun-24 13:17:35

Iam64

You can’t seriously compare the country the tories inherited with the one we live in now

And the fact that the Tories will be handing over a much bigger poisoned chalice.

Norah Mon 24-Jun-24 13:19:20

Immediate changes? Tax rises.

Germanshepherdsmum Mon 24-Jun-24 13:21:58

I have started a new thread about the comments of the IFS on the parties’ manifestos, which they say are not fully funded. Worth a read whatever your leanings. The IFS conclude that we will be very much in the dark when we vote.

Casdon Mon 24-Jun-24 13:24:41

vegansrock

So much project fear on here - straight out of the right wing media playbook- as if we didnt currently have crumbling public services, highest taxation since WW2 , increased immigration - all under the Tories - and people are voting for more of the same? Anyone voting Tory must be wealthy or dim in my opinion. As for Corbyn being pm- totally ridiculous - remember we have had 5 Tory PMs and countless ministerial changes so it’s not as if they have been strong and stable. Starmer could be accused of being like a kindly but strict headmaster who isn’t the most exciting character, but at least he doesn’t have that whiff of posh boy sleaze that surrounds many of the current talentless Tory crop . Plus where’s the £350 m a week for the NHS and the 40 new hospitals?

It’s an age thing unfortunately. As people age self preservation seems to take priority over altruism for many, I can’t think of any other reason why as a group over 65s are so out of step with the rest of the population. It’s not the wisdom of age because it’s evident in many posts that people haven’t taken the time to check out the statistics or evidence.
www.statista.com/statistics/1379439/uk-election-polls-by-age/