Rekarie
I've just read about this. Just shocking!
How on earth was he found guilty? His lost hat with someone else's hair in it? Left handed/right handed conflicting evidence. Brain injury at birth?
He confessed due to his panic at endless questioning.
An awful case which should have been thrown out of court.
Part of the evidence against Campbell was his hat, which was found at the scene and he admitted was his but had been taken off him by someone several days before the robbery.
The hat contained hairs but none of them belonged to Mr Campbell.
Sky News
The hat with someone else's hairs may not have been presented as evidence in court as, until amendments in the CJA, it was not necessary for the prosecution to share forensic evidence with the defence lawyers.
The fact that one of the robbers in the case had stated that Mr Campbell was not his accomplice was not presented to the jury.
Prison officers did not believe Mr Campbell to be capable of murdering someone.
The police breached Codes of Conduct.
it was a total stitch-up.
Another miscarriage of justice which has taken far too long to put right.
Poor man, he has been out on licence for some time and now his conviction has been quashed at last, I hope he will received compensation and can move on with his life.