ronib
LizzieDrip but all children do not have the same start in life. There will never be a level playing field regardless of type of school.
It’s quite interesting to read comments about being rich and not very bright. We are talking about children who have years of development ahead. Children as VAT cash cows - who would have thought it?
Think you’re missing the point entirely.
Of course all children don’t start life with equal chances, that’s why great state education is essential for ALL children, in all areas.
Education is a great leveller and creates life choices.
Increasing private school education to more people will create an even larger gap between the “haves” and the “have nots”
Those in independent schools don’t necessarily have better teachers and teaching, but inevitably will have much smaller classes, better facilities and better opportunities.
I’d like us to move away from the “old boy network”
We have some extremely good independent schools close to us, one of which is from 4-16 and is known as the “rich but dim” school, as we still have grammar schools which have a good percentage of the other independent and one prep school 11+ passes, though by no means the majority. A very large percentage of our grammar students now have intensive coaching.
I’d love to see a return to countrywide grammars, with ALL children routinely sitting the 11+ and 13+ as part of their mainstream schooling, and sat in their own schools.
Then I’d like more vocational schools, good comprehensive schools and a wide range of secondary choices to suit each child.
I went to Secondary Education for one academic year, in California. Mixed aged classes, similar ability, and summer school for all those not making good progress. It was a good model, with mandatory PE classes every day and early classes, so all finished school at 2:30pm