Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(431 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:16:41

Looking forward

Keir Starmer will pledge billions of pounds of extra investment in transport, schools and hospitals in his inaugural budget,

Starmer has made clear his central mission is to get the economy growing. The government is hoping that billions of pounds of public investment unveiled at the budget will help attract more private investment to the UK.

….the budget will be presented as a down payment on “fixing the foundations” of the country, as the government uses all the levers at its disposal to grow the economy, with capital investment at the heart of its plans.
Starmer’s words are the clearest signal yet that the government is pushing ahead with plans to borrow tens of billions of pounds extra for infrastructure investment by changing how it calculates the fiscal rules.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, told the cabinet on Tuesday she wanted to change how the Treasury accounted for capital spending to reflect its benefits, despite concerns about the rising cost of UK government debt.
A senior government source said the capital investment would go into improving schools and hospitals, repairing crumbling buildings and investing to make the system work better, in things such as medical diagnostic equipment.
Other areas for capital spending were expected to include rail and roads, as well as money to invest alongside businesses such as gigafactories and renewable energy projects.
The government was looking to make a big argument for long-term investment, the source added, but the chancellor had been very clear that putting investment in would need to see a quick return in turns of services being improved and delivering on good jobs.

Mamie Sat 12-Oct-24 06:59:23

Thank you WWM2. Good to see you back and good to see some factual information about what has been done so far.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 08:38:13

Taxing the Gambling sector

Sources familiar with the discussions said the Treasury had yet to make a decision but appeared receptive to tweaking the UK’s complex regime of betting and gaming duties to raise extra funds of between £900m and £3bn, despite opposition from industry lobbyists.

mae13 Sat 12-Oct-24 08:43:31

Unfortunately, the "Freebies Galore" fiasco will be the Albatross around Sir Kier's neck that's going to be hard to shake off.
And I don't expect Rachel Reeves to pull any magic rabbits out of the hat.

Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 08:55:41

The UK economy returned to growth in August after flatlining for two months, in a boost for the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, before the autumn budget.

biglouis Sat 12-Oct-24 08:56:17

Sources familiar with the discussions said the Treasury had yet to make a decision but appeared receptive to tweaking the UK’s complex regime of betting and gaming duties to raise extra funds of between £900m and £3bn, despite opposition from industry lobbyists

Speaking as one who has never gambled (except on one occasion in Las Vegas) this seems like a good idea. If people are taxed on money they earn through work why not tax them on what is essentially free money?

Iam64 Sat 12-Oct-24 09:06:00

Thanks Whitewave, good to see this summary. It’s ‘interesting’ that the (welcome) re-nationalisation of the railways hasn’t been given as much media attention as other much less important issues, not related to policies.

Wyllow3 Sat 12-Oct-24 09:26:02

Thank you WWM.
There can be no "magic rabbits" mae
Slow steps are what he said, and what he is delivering.

In your "looking forward"post its sad to recognise the reality that a lot of money will have to be used to "Catch up"on austerity not new projects

as in "the capital investment would go into improving schools and hospitals, repairing crumbling buildings and investing to make the system work better, in things such as medical diagnostic equipment".

LizzieDrip Sat 12-Oct-24 09:27:11

Thanks WW👍

What a lot our new government has achieved in just 100 days - as well as dealing effectively with the awful riots.

It’s such a shame that most of the MSM doesn’t even mention any of these achievements and policies - they’re just interested in irrelevant tittle tattle & lies which are then further whipped up on SM.

Anyway, your excellent factual summary is much appreciatedthanks

Mollygo Sat 12-Oct-24 09:27:24

The government defines flexible working as a way of working "that suits an employee’s needs", for example, having flexible start and finish times, or working from home.
^Employees can already request flexible working from their first day in a job, but an employer can refuse an application if they have a good business reason for doing so.
It is unclear if there will be a big shift from current rules and there appear to be many reasons available to employers to refuse flexible working in the new bill.^
The grounds against granting requests include:
Burden of additional costs
Detrimental effect on ability to meet customer demand
Inability to re-organise work among existing staff
Inability to recruit additional staff
Detrimental impact on quality

Lots of get out clauses still available, so that’s OK.

I guess teachers won’t be getting more flexible working hours e.g. changing start and finish times.
Burden of additional cost of supply staff
Parent dissatisfaction over use of cover teachers at KS3.
Detrimental impact on quality especially for those children who need continuity because of their SEND.

I remember the fuss made by school governors when it was suggested that PPA time could be done at home. We overcame that one by pointing out how much work was already done at home.

growstuff Sat 12-Oct-24 09:30:06

Teaching is covered by the regulations. As you say, schools can easily make a business case for teachers' having to work set hours.

Oreo Sat 12-Oct-24 09:37:18

LizzieDrip

Thanks WW👍

What a lot our new government has achieved in just 100 days - as well as dealing effectively with the awful riots.

It’s such a shame that most of the MSM doesn’t even mention any of these achievements and policies - they’re just interested in irrelevant tittle tattle & lies which are then further whipped up on SM.

Anyway, your excellent factual summary is much appreciatedthanks

Not much in the way of achievements as yet if you want to stay factual mind you.
Most are aspirations as yet.
I don’t mind that not much has been actually been done, in fact I think it would be better to take time to reflect on what needs doing rather than rush things out half baked as they did with the WFA just to look as if they’re working flat out.

Lisaangel10 Sat 12-Oct-24 09:43:35

Can this be merged with the other 100 days thread?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 10:18:51

Lisaangel10

Can this be merged with the other 100 days thread?

I sort of dithered over that.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Sat 12-Oct-24 10:24:25

It could be regarded as the ‘second 100 days’ thread.
It’s Budget Day in two weeks’ time. That’ll be very interesting.

growstuff Sat 12-Oct-24 10:31:00

Lisaangel10

Can this be merged with the other 100 days thread?

... and all the other threads knocking Labour.

LizzieDrip Sat 12-Oct-24 10:32:53

IMO this thread is very different from the other ‘100 days’ thread, and they should remain separate.

This one is based on factual evidence; the other one is based on subjective opinion (re-read the opening post in the ‘other’ thread).

Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 10:56:45

I took it to mean with the first 100 days started in the summer?

Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 11:13:15

But if you meant the thread running at the moment - I don’t think that is a good idea because I am trying to keep this as objective as possible, although naturally people are and should be able to express their opinion.

However, the other 100 day thread is a subjective chat, which is not necessarily very accurate, which is fine, but not the same thing as what this thread is trying to achieve, which is to give information as objectively and accurately as possible

Notagranyet24 Sat 12-Oct-24 11:18:06

Excellent post, thank you WW. This is interesting to listen to www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0jx3mhk?partner=uk.co.bbc&origin=share-mobile
Starmer sounds like a calm adult as opposed to others I can think of.

keepingquiet Sat 12-Oct-24 11:33:54

Starmer said this was a government of service. Service should come back into the political vocabulary in my opinion after years of grab and go.

Despite a few media storms (and I sense a few hurricanes to come) we have adults in charge and of course children will kick off.

I didn't vote for Starmer as leader but I do have the sense he knows what he's doing and doesn't care too much about what the media think, unlike Blair who courted them at his peril.

We have a long way to go but I am hopeful and grateful for this thread.

blue14 Sat 12-Oct-24 11:35:17

Pleased to see you back. Thank you WWM.
This is so clear and informative.

growstuff Sat 12-Oct-24 12:15:18

I agree with you keepingquiet (and I take back my earlier post). I'm just getting exasperated by the sneering, silly names and dead cats on most threads related to the government.

It's good to keep track of what the government is actually doing behind all the negative publicity. Hopefully, they can get their PR sorted out and the budget brings some optimism.

Iam64 Sat 12-Oct-24 20:18:43

Growstuff 👍

I listened to Question Time today. The audience reaction to the government generally positive, to the opposition generally negative