Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(432 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 18:02:05

Lisaangel10

These weight loss injections cannot be used indefinitely. Once people stop them it is very easy to regain the weight plus more.
Seems like a waste of money to me.

That’s so true. You have to change your way of eating and improve your exercise regime for anything to have a permanent effect.

Positives: It might give people a boost to start losing weight, as long as the impact is noticeable fairly quickly.
The vaccinations must be carried out under medical supervision, so some people will get to see a medical practitioner (I hesitate to say doctor) regularly.

Negatives:
We don’t know the long term effects of these drugs. Some of the diet drugs handed out or bought over the counter cause problems and dangerous side effects.
Will there be insurance for any damage caused to those taking the treatment?

If they don’t work fairly quickly or if they rely on increased exercise and change of eating habits too, they will be as you say, a waste of money.

Oreo Tue 15-Oct-24 18:02:20

That’s good.

Oreo Tue 15-Oct-24 18:03:05

My comment was to Casdon.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 18:23:29

No weight loss option works for everybody though Mollygo, does it? Even people who opt for a surgical solution can bypass the impact on their stomach by puréing Mars bars or whatever.

Surely it’s a good thing to have as wide an array of different weight loss solutions for people who are morbidly obese as possible, even if for some it won’t be a lifetime solution. So many people are unable to have operations, work or live normal lives because of their weight, and there must be many thousands who just want to lose weight so they can do all those things.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 19:09:57

Casdon I posted both positive and negatives as I saw them.
There probably are thousands who just want to lose weight -quite a few of them appear at the gym.
My concern about long term side effects mentioned in connection with the active ingredient are the potential long-term effects of Wegovy.

They include pancreatitis, acute kidney injury, gallbladder problems, increased heart rate, diabetic retinopathy, mental health issues, and potentially thyroid cancer.
Back in the 1970s, an appetite suppressant drug prescribed for my aunt was later held responsible as a cause of her death. Hence my question about insurance.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 19:24:26

Mollygo

Casdon I posted both positive and negatives as I saw them.
There probably are thousands who just want to lose weight -quite a few of them appear at the gym.
My concern about long term side effects mentioned in connection with the active ingredient are the potential long-term effects of Wegovy.

They include pancreatitis, acute kidney injury, gallbladder problems, increased heart rate, diabetic retinopathy, mental health issues, and potentially thyroid cancer.
Back in the 1970s, an appetite suppressant drug prescribed for my aunt was later held responsible as a cause of her death. Hence my question about insurance.

It’s a gamble when you take any drug unfortunately, as they all have side effects, some rare, some not uncommon. Patients will be given the information and told to return to their doctor if they experience side effects. For many though, regardless of potential side effects this will be a best available solution. It’s less risky than living for years with morbid obesity and the known impact of that on all your organs and musculoskeletal system.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 21:18:39

Do you think they will provide insurance against potential damage or will it be another thalidomide type experiment?

Doodledog Tue 15-Oct-24 21:39:09

I assume that if they are going to be given to people who are morbidly obese, they must be at risk of death from being overweight, so this will be considered a risk worth taking, from a medical perspective. Obviously they will be voluntary, so if the patient is unwilling to take the risk of the drug they can opt out and risk dying of obesity-related illness instead.

Many operations are risky, but if the alternative (ie not having the operation) is also risky, then the risks have to be weighed up, and this will happen every day.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 21:46:22

I’m not sure why you think that would be done, all drugs carry a risk to some people, but there are rigorous clinical trials carried out before they are approved for general use. To my knowledge, insurance has never been provided.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 21:47:39

Crossed post Doodledog.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 22:39:56

That’s what I thought. Though with all the infected blood, thalidomide etc. cases I did hope there would be some reassurance in place.
Hopefully there will be no fatal side effects as there were for my aunt, but if there are, you’re right. There is the consolation that they would have died anyway because of their weight issues.

For those morbidly obese, or even just obese, they will then be faced with the problem of flabby skin -even if they exercise. I watched a program about that and how the delight with the weight loss turned to depression that the improvement in their weight did not solve the problem with their bodies.

MayBee70 Wed 16-Oct-24 11:00:04

Just watched an interview with the Chief Economic Adviser Allianz on Sky News who, even though the interviewer tried to get him to do otherwise ( as has been happening ever since the election) had nothing but praise for how the government are handling the economy.

ronib Wed 16-Oct-24 11:14:32

MayBee70 was it Ludovic Subran also lecturing at LSE that well known supporters club for the left wing?

Doodledog Wed 16-Oct-24 11:24:32

For those morbidly obese, or even just obese, they will then be faced with the problem of flabby skin -even if they exercise. I watched a program about that and how the delight with the weight loss turned to depression that the improvement in their weight did not solve the problem with their bodies.
If someone has a tumour cut out from somewhere visible they may have disfiguring consequences, but surely it's worth it if they don't die? Treating the morbidly obese seems to me to be in the same category.

To return to the subject of the thread (ie government action), Wes Streeting was talking about helping people back to work by treating their obesity. Someone big enough to be unable to work must be very overweight - I'm sure we have all worked with many 'outsize' people who are perfectly capable of working, so we are talking about extremes here.

IMO it can only be a good idea to help them to reach a point where their lives are no longer at risk, and they can live a normal, productive life. The cosmetic implications can be dealt with later - whether the NHS takes responsibility for that or not is a separate issue. We've had years hearing about an 'obesity crisis' in terms of what it costs the NHS, not in terms of the human consequences. Surely it's better that people are helped, rather than vilified?

I would love to see a fully independent breakdown of the figures, with costs for obesity-related heath issues and benefits paid to those unable to work as a direct result of being overweight set against the income from tax on sugar, profits on fast food, money coming in from the 'diet industry' (books, magazines, slimming clubs, health spas, dietary supplements, sweeteners and so on). I think the reasons why help has been rationed until now, and why the messaging is all about blame and accusation for the individuals concerned would become quickly apparent.

I feel the same about addictions such as smoking and alcohol, and would love to see a wide-ranging (and fully independent if that's even possible) inquiry into the costs and benefits to the economy of the human misery for which they are responsible too.

MayBee70 Wed 16-Oct-24 11:26:12

No idea who he was ( it didn’t mention his name on the caption beneath and I didn’t see the beginning of the interview).You’ll have to watch it so you can then pick his comments to pieces. Heaven forbid that Sky News should interview someone about the drop in inflation that isn’t totally opposed to the current government. I’m surprised they didn’t ask Farage or Tice for their opinion tbh.

ronib Wed 16-Oct-24 12:21:31

Well I am still wondering why Sunak held the election back in July. As everyone knows inflation was expected to drop around now. Zero effort required from the new government on this one I believe. Doubtless someone will have the hard figures to back this up? If such figures exist?

Doodledog Wed 16-Oct-24 12:32:42

ronib

Well I am still wondering why Sunak held the election back in July. As everyone knows inflation was expected to drop around now. Zero effort required from the new government on this one I believe. Doubtless someone will have the hard figures to back this up? If such figures exist?

Just possibly the election was called when it was because of the state of the prisons, the failure of the Rwanda 'plan', the covid enquiry being due to expose even more corruption, the highest tax burden on the population for 70 years having failed to stabilise the economy, the crisis in the sewage system and the water supply, the imminent incoming of even more red tape surrounding Brexit, rumblings in the back benches about the lacklustre leadership, non-dom status coming in, the state of the polls showing that there was no chance of another term whatever happened. . . . .

Casdon Wed 16-Oct-24 12:33:24

This is why ronib.
www.cnn.com/2024/05/24/uk/prime-minister-rishi-sunak-election-intl/index.html
His crystal ball clearly didn’t match yours, or else he knew that even if inflation came down the Tories would lose the election, take your pick.

MayBee70 Wed 16-Oct-24 12:33:51

So you’re saying that Sunak is responsible for the drop in inflation?

ronib Wed 16-Oct-24 12:37:47

MayBee70 yes

rosie1959 Wed 16-Oct-24 12:41:49

I am not sure handing out these weight loss injections will have much impact. The key to weight loss seems easy eat less and move more but it has far more due to a state of mind you have to want
to loose weight and put the effort in to achieve your goal.

Casdon Wed 16-Oct-24 12:45:22

I think you’re wrong ronib, and this is why:

‘’The surprise fall in inflation September was mainly driven by airfares and fuel, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.
Petrol and diesel prices were significantly lower, dropping by 10.4% in September compared with the same month a year earlier.
Airfare prices for domestic, European and long-haul flights normally fall after the summer rush, but they fell more than normal last month.
However, households were hit by an uptick in the pace of food and non-alcoholic drink price rises’
According to BBC News.

The UK does not control oil prices, so external factors have caused the fall.

Doodledog Wed 16-Oct-24 12:46:14

rosie1959

I am not sure handing out these weight loss injections will have much impact. The key to weight loss seems easy eat less and move more but it has far more due to a state of mind you have to want
to loose weight and put the effort in to achieve your goal.

Is that true though? I haven't sen any research to back that up, and there are numerous celebrities who have definitely seen an impact.

I am not obese, but am overweight because of medical reasons, and can assure anyone that however much I may want to lose weight, the key to weight loss is not easy if your metabolism is slow and exercise is difficult, regardless of 'effort'. My state of mind doesn't come into it either.

ronib Wed 16-Oct-24 13:01:54

Casdon thank you for researching this. I was busy. So clearly not to Starmer’s credit either?

rosie1959 Wed 16-Oct-24 13:06:30

Doodledog

rosie1959

I am not sure handing out these weight loss injections will have much impact. The key to weight loss seems easy eat less and move more but it has far more due to a state of mind you have to want
to loose weight and put the effort in to achieve your goal.

Is that true though? I haven't sen any research to back that up, and there are numerous celebrities who have definitely seen an impact.

I am not obese, but am overweight because of medical reasons, and can assure anyone that however much I may want to lose weight, the key to weight loss is not easy if your metabolism is slow and exercise is difficult, regardless of 'effort'. My state of mind doesn't come into it either.

This was just my opinion from experience of trying to loose weight I find that my state of mind can affect the choices of food that I eat. If I stick religiously to a reduced calorie intake I will loose weight regardless.
I will often ‘treat’ myself to chocolate for instance even though I am not actually hungry if I am feeling a bit fed up.
If I increase the amount I move it can make me feel better I have found lack of activity makes me feel tired and sluggish.