Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(432 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

Allira Sat 19-Oct-24 10:15:20

TerriBull

I don't think as women we should judge other women for whatever path they opt for as far as working or being a sahm. Circumstances often dictate in these matters, it's certainly far more prevalent now women have to work, two incomes are required and in any case some women find themselves the breadwinner. Living fairly near an infant/junior school before we moved a couple of years ago the proliferation of parents picking children up from after school clubs until 6 pm was very apparent, these were few and far between when my children were growing up. I imagine there are possibly now more financial pressures relating to housing.

I was glad to be a sahm until my children went to school, Sometimes those days were fraught, sometimes they were wonderful, but there were also good and bad days at work. I don't think there is any right or wrong way whatever path women go down, sometimes it's simply a matter of needs must

Well said, Terribull.

I was wondering about relative costs too.

Is it more expensive for the State to subsidise working parents with tax credits and nursery vouchers than to allow a few years of credits towards a state pension? The pension credits cost the Government nothing at the time and the cost is deferred for 30 or even 40 years.
The other point is - where and what are these jobs? There are more jobseekers than vacancies at the moment.

Casdon Sat 19-Oct-24 10:14:06

This government isn’t saying that Oreo. What they are saying is that they will improve provision to make it easier for women to work if they choose to. The evidence is that the vast majority of women do want to return to work, but many can’t because there is insufficient and inflexible provision.

I don’t think it’s for our generation to tell young women what they ‘should’ do, we’ve had our time, and we have to respect that their choices are not ours.

Oreo Sat 19-Oct-24 10:02:48

I don’t believe any government should be saying let’s get Mums back to work or similar.

Oreo Sat 19-Oct-24 10:01:18

If it’s needs must for Mums to work with a baby or a toddler then that’s it obvs but for many it’s choice.There are two issues here, what’s best for the Mother and what’s best for the baby.
If we’re talking best for the baby it’s having their Mum close to them.

eazybee Sat 19-Oct-24 09:34:32

Introducing Bridget Phillipson to discuss the forthcoming nurseries, Amol Rajan's opening announcement was that 'the main aim is to help women back into work' which I found alarming; I appreciate the comments about ' dumping grounds for kids.' Nurseries' main aim is to aid children's development, and days from 8am to 6pm are too long for young children; I saw them being collected when I was leaving school at 6pm. tired and fretful ( me as well.) I understand needs must, having been a working divorced mother, but I don't like this, 'get mothers back to work' attitude, without any discussion of cost, subsidies, time, arrangements, facilities etc, just 'spare classrooms will be retro-fitted for younger children'; absolutely no mention of the effect on young children.
I found Bridget Phillipson uncommunicative; when asked about teacher retention she snapped, 'they've had a pay rise already'. It will be interesting to see how many of these extra teachers she is able to provide. All aspiration at the moment.
This is a woman with five years work experience, two in local government, three as manager of a home for women in need, then into Parliament where there are excellent child care facilities, even extending into late evening..

TerriBull Sat 19-Oct-24 09:23:12

I don't think as women we should judge other women for whatever path they opt for as far as working or being a sahm. Circumstances often dictate in these matters, it's certainly far more prevalent now women have to work, two incomes are required and in any case some women find themselves the breadwinner. Living fairly near an infant/junior school before we moved a couple of years ago the proliferation of parents picking children up from after school clubs until 6 pm was very apparent, these were few and far between when my children were growing up. I imagine there are possibly now more financial pressures relating to housing.

I was glad to be a sahm until my children went to school, Sometimes those days were fraught, sometimes they were wonderful, but there were also good and bad days at work. I don't think there is any right or wrong way whatever path women go down, sometimes it's simply a matter of needs must

Freya5 Sat 19-Oct-24 07:55:04

Oreo

Allira

If parents go back to work full-time, it's a long old day for tiny tots who are dropped off at nursery first thing in the morning and not picked up until about 5.30 or 6.00 pm.

All very well for the mother who wants to stay on the career ladder, but what about the child?

It’s a sad state of affairs isn’t it?

My daughter , a single Mum, after marriage breakdown, had no choice . Both children to nursery, attached to local Primary school, as she wanted to keep working to pay bills mortgage etc. Father's input was a pittance. Now years on, both children happy, well adjusted, and GG goes to same nursery. Job well done from nursery. So don't knock it. Needs must .

ronib Sat 19-Oct-24 07:50:31

Iam64 fyi my 3 year old gs did not have a key worker and was not given a gradual introduction to a very full day at his nursery.
I am sorry that his experience was unsatisfactory. This site could be a valuable resource for exchanging information - a lost opportunity it seems.

Iam64 Sat 19-Oct-24 07:41:29

growstuff - we seem to have had similar experiences with young children. Mine are nearly 40 now and like yiu, reading some nonsense here makes me amazed they survived (and thrived)
Children aren’t dumped with strangers. They’re gradually introduced to their nursery or childminder. In nurseries, they have a named key worker.
Doodledog’s comment about the difficulty discussing politics on gransnet resonates with me

ronib Sat 19-Oct-24 06:33:45

Extension of nursery provision is of course a Conservative policy left for the current government to provide and find funding. I hope Angela Rayner is able to improve workers’ welfare and working conditions especially for carers and families as planned.

growstuff Sat 19-Oct-24 02:56:42

Allira My children were dropped off at 8 and picked up at 6. They had a sleep during the day, just as they would have done if they'd been at home. They weren't the ones who were tired, but their mother, who was doing a full-time job and spending quality time with her children, was exhausted.

growstuff Sat 19-Oct-24 02:51:56

Oreo

Allira

If parents go back to work full-time, it's a long old day for tiny tots who are dropped off at nursery first thing in the morning and not picked up until about 5.30 or 6.00 pm.

All very well for the mother who wants to stay on the career ladder, but what about the child?

It’s a sad state of affairs isn’t it?

My own poor children! I honestly don't know how they turned out as they have done. hmm

What patronising and judgmental posts!

Doodledog Sat 19-Oct-24 00:01:03

Are parents to stay at home when their children are at school?

Really?

Sorry, I don’t understand this.

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 22:38:35

Allira

If parents go back to work full-time, it's a long old day for tiny tots who are dropped off at nursery first thing in the morning and not picked up until about 5.30 or 6.00 pm.

All very well for the mother who wants to stay on the career ladder, but what about the child?

It’s a sad state of affairs isn’t it?

Allira Fri 18-Oct-24 22:08:31

Doodledog

This is why the push to build more houses and to increase the amount of social housing, plus the new raft of workers’ rights are a good thing.

It’s not all about getting babies into nursery. I don’t think we can keep paying parents to stay at home when their children are at school, but that’s a separate issue.

Are parents to stay at home when their children are at school?

Really?

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 22:02:54

This is why the push to build more houses and to increase the amount of social housing, plus the new raft of workers’ rights are a good thing.

It’s not all about getting babies into nursery. I don’t think we can keep paying parents to stay at home when their children are at school, but that’s a separate issue.

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 21:32:14

Forget CNN

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 21:31:37

Doodledog I keep telling you that Bridget Phillipson gave the strongest impression that two parents need to be in work. Looking around it does seem to be common for young babies - even at 5 months- to go to full day childcare. The cost of CNN living is so high and wages are kept artificially low in the main. Houses are now eye wateringly expensive. Hence the need for dual incomes.

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 21:26:19

Improving provision is not the same as issuing a diktat. Childcare is eye wateringly expensive, and the vouchers issued by Sunak are not working- they don’t pay the nursery enough, and don’t kick in early enough for parents who want to use them.

Those who don’t want to work can stay at home if they want to - I don’t know where the idea of compulsion has come from.

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 20:22:51

Doodledog have you somehow missed all the announcements surrounding nursery school provision attached to primary schools? Also the other discussion about how to train staff? It’s firmly Labour policy so clearly part of the 100 days. 100000 nursery staff?

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 20:08:10

Allira

If parents go back to work full-time, it's a long old day for tiny tots who are dropped off at nursery first thing in the morning and not picked up until about 5.30 or 6.00 pm.

All very well for the mother who wants to stay on the career ladder, but what about the child?

Nobody has to send their child to nursery.

There is no diktat grin.

There is even a financial incentive for those who can afford it to stay at home, in the form of 12 years pension contributions per child, which is not given to those paying into the system.

I have no idea what this misconception has to do with a thread about the first 100 days of the new government - has anyone?

Allira Fri 18-Oct-24 19:58:22

If parents go back to work full-time, it's a long old day for tiny tots who are dropped off at nursery first thing in the morning and not picked up until about 5.30 or 6.00 pm.

All very well for the mother who wants to stay on the career ladder, but what about the child?

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 19:11:23

All of whom ….

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 18:54:40

eazybee I don’t think 3 months at the age of 3 in isolation for diphtheria would qualify a child for loss of significant other. The child had many years to recover from the experience too. A poor example? Also from your description it would seem that your father had the full benefit of the extended family as well as parents all who were very invested in his care. So very different to modern childcare practices in the main.

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 18:37:00

I agree with MayBee. I don't see any slavish following of party on here. I will agree with people and policies on one thing that I disagree with on another - whether politicians or 'ordinary people'. The insistence that unthinking defence is happening is tiresome, and if people can't see (or choose to ignore) criticism it shows their own limited viewpoint.

I still have high hopes for the new government, and am conscious of the fact that they have only been in power for three months or so, and have fourteen years to dismantle, as well as hostile media. I hope they get it right, for everyone's sake, and if they don't I will criticise them.

The first test will be the budget in a couple of weeks. That will show 'the direction of travel', even if they can't be as radical as they would like.