Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(432 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

eazybee Fri 18-Oct-24 18:29:18

There’s no better or more natural environment for a very young child than to be with its parent, even better, its Mother.
Says who?

I would imagine John Bowlby, Maternal Deprivation but sadly I no longer have my 60 years old ( at least ) copy to argue my point.

The theory was disproved by my father who spent several blissful months in 1908 aged 3 in a Diptheria isolation hospital, with a nurse in full-time attendance, masses of lovely toys and other children to play with, and his father cycling a ten mile round trip to stand on a chair and wave through the window.
Mind you; Bowlby hadn't met my paternal grandmother.

Mollygo Fri 18-Oct-24 18:06:18

Oreo

I criticise any political party Maybee when they’re in power and I disagree with policies or actions and that includes my own party Labour. It seems odd to me to defend something simply cos you voted for it, or even odder to praise everything they do.I was relieved they won the election but they haven’t made it easy for me since then.Hope things improve soon.

Well said. Oreo.

MayBee70 Fri 18-Oct-24 18:05:53

Allira

My Party, right or wrong!

Not for me, if we all felt like that we'd never have a change of government.

I don’t think any of the Labour voters on here have that attitude. I certainly don’t. I’ll always criticise when necessary and praise when it’s due with all parties. But I am prepared to give Labour time given the chaos they’ve inherited from a party that is still chaotic, divided and veering to the far right. I just wish that Sunak was continuing as party leader even though I’ve always believed that a party leader should stand down after losing an election. He’s so much better than the people replacing him.

Allira Fri 18-Oct-24 17:51:53

My Party, right or wrong!

Not for me, if we all felt like that we'd never have a change of government.

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 17:34:11

I criticise any political party Maybee when they’re in power and I disagree with policies or actions and that includes my own party Labour. It seems odd to me to defend something simply cos you voted for it, or even odder to praise everything they do.I was relieved they won the election but they haven’t made it easy for me since then.Hope things improve soon.

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 17:30:02

There’s no dumping you’re quite right, it’s either a choice to leave young ones with strangers in a child care setting or there’s no alternative sadly.No diktats either.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 17:28:38

There’s no better or more natural environment for a very young child than to be with its parent, even better, its Mother

Says who?

That is no more than your opinion, to which, of course, you are perfectly entitled. It is, nevertheless, an opinion.

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 17:22:17

I don't think anyone is arguing, Oreo. Not about people's choices surrounding bringing up their own children, anyway. They are individual and what is right for one family may not be for others - in fact what is right within one family may not be right for siblings.

What people are taking issue with is the idea that mothers 'dump their babies onto strangers' to put an 'emphasis on career over family', that there is a government 'diktat' forcing parents of babies to work, and that this leads to an increase in serious MH issues in the young. All of that is patent nonsense.

MayBee70 Fri 18-Oct-24 17:19:45

Oreo, you say that you say you are a Labour Party voter and supporter but, apart from ronib I can’t think of anyone else on gransnet who is more critical of the party than you are. I have to be honest and say it confuses me.

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 17:10:25

growstuff

Oreo

Oh for heaven’s sake growstuff most of social media including this thread is opinion. Where is all this sniping at anything ronib says coming from?
In any case early years childcare is a minefield and I don’t believe anyone knows the full knock on effects of it on youngsters but in my own opinion there’s nothing better for a baby and child under three than to be at home with a loving parent.Note the use of the word loving.

There are links on social media to peer-reviewed research. Social media isn't all about unsubstantiated opinion.

PS. As for sniping ... well ... my lips are sealed.

Your lips may be sealed but not your typing finger😄
Am sure there’s all kinds of research and study about the effect on babies toddlers and young children put into nurseries and childcare but nothing can be definitive as the types of childcare, the adults running it and the characters of the children are all so very different.
There’s no better or more natural environment for a very young child than to be with its parent, even better, its Mother, when that parent is a loving one, I doubt anyone would care to dispute that, it’s an important start in life.It isn’t always possible but anything else, any form of childcare will be second best to that from age 0 to 3.
After that, some form of interaction with its peers is more welcome I would say at least for a few mornings per week.
Yep, them’s my own thoughts but what I and am sure many others sincerely believe.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 15:18:08

I'm sure there are those who welcome your opinion Oreo. Maybe you have some evidence to support your opinion.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 15:16:35

Oreo

Oh for heaven’s sake growstuff most of social media including this thread is opinion. Where is all this sniping at anything ronib says coming from?
In any case early years childcare is a minefield and I don’t believe anyone knows the full knock on effects of it on youngsters but in my own opinion there’s nothing better for a baby and child under three than to be at home with a loving parent.Note the use of the word loving.

There are links on social media to peer-reviewed research. Social media isn't all about unsubstantiated opinion.

PS. As for sniping ... well ... my lips are sealed.

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 15:01:15

Oreo

Oh for heaven’s sake growstuff most of social media including this thread is opinion. Where is all this sniping at anything ronib says coming from?
In any case early years childcare is a minefield and I don’t believe anyone knows the full knock on effects of it on youngsters but in my own opinion there’s nothing better for a baby and child under three than to be at home with a loving parent.Note the use of the word loving.

There is no 'diktat' saying that parents can't stay at home with under threes though. People on benefits still get them with no requirement to work if they have babies. When the children go to school the parents will be expected to work, but only if they claim benefits. If they don't claim benefits, they get free pension contributions and child benefits if their partner earns under £80k. And mothers (or fathers) don't 'dump their babies on strangers' whether they work or not.

Oreo Fri 18-Oct-24 14:48:37

Oh for heaven’s sake growstuff most of social media including this thread is opinion. Where is all this sniping at anything ronib says coming from?
In any case early years childcare is a minefield and I don’t believe anyone knows the full knock on effects of it on youngsters but in my own opinion there’s nothing better for a baby and child under three than to be at home with a loving parent.Note the use of the word loving.

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 14:40:44

I don't see how the experience of one family can be extrapolated to the rest of society.

Excellent childcare will be sought after in every area - what parent wouldn't seek excellent care for their children? My own experience suggests that different models suit different children at different stages - a small baby has different needs from those of a toddler, whose are different from those of a pre-schooler. But I am not saying that my experience is any more than that - it's just my experience. As it happens, the nursery we used on a part-time basis the year before each of my children started school was consistently excellent, or we wouldn't have used it.

As growstuff says, the fact that you noticed a deterioration in the MH of young people at the same time as hearing Bridget Phillipson on TV is not proof of a link, and I very much doubt that you are a lone voice when it comes to asking about developments in nursery education. There are people whose whole careers are in this area, with access to stats and experience of research projects and the like.

I agree that life is difficult for a lot of families, which is why the government is looking at ways to ensure that money goes to those who need it, rather than basing allowances on age. The cost of housing is at the root of a lot of people's struggles, and it is good to see the government has a plan to change this, although it won't have immediate results. Similarly, workers' rights have taken a battering over the past 15 years or so, and the raft of measures coming on stream will help with that, too, so there is hope on the horizon.

Of course small children have rights. I can't imagine anyone thinking otherwise. IME most families find a balance between career and family life. There may well be problems if emphasis is placed on one over the other, but these are individual issues that can't really be legislated for.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 14:28:39

ronib

Doodledog just a few points. Excellent childcare is very sought after in my location and we did have an outstanding child minder from age 1 until 3. It was then thought that my grandson at 3 should start nursery, outstanding at the time and downgraded to good however.
So that was a very poor decision as it happens.
I then heard Bridget Phillipson on tv and I am a lone voice obviously asking about the latest developments in expanding nursery education. I also noticed that child mental health is deteriorating.
I feel that life in the Uk is becoming very difficult for a lot of families and the current government is unlikely to improve matters.
The emphasis on career over family when children are very young is a mistake imo. Small children should have rights too.
As it happens my son undertakes most of the dropping off and collecting….and yes he wasn’t too happy either at the poor care in nursery.

Thank you so much for ensuring that we're all aware of opinion ronib.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 14:22:27

FriedGreenTomatoes2

And in today’s news:

Rachel Reeves will seek to make about £3bn of cuts to welfare over the next four years by restricting access to sickness benefits, it is understood, according to the PA news agency.

The Chancellor is expected to commit to the previous Tory government’s plans to save the sum by reforming work capability rules, as first reported by the Telegraph."

Also reported by the FT and the Times.

Shouldn't that be that Rachel Reeves is not going to reverse the Conservatives' cuts?

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 14:20:55

ronib

Doodledog just a few points. Excellent childcare is very sought after in my location and we did have an outstanding child minder from age 1 until 3. It was then thought that my grandson at 3 should start nursery, outstanding at the time and downgraded to good however.
So that was a very poor decision as it happens.
I then heard Bridget Phillipson on tv and I am a lone voice obviously asking about the latest developments in expanding nursery education. I also noticed that child mental health is deteriorating.
I feel that life in the Uk is becoming very difficult for a lot of families and the current government is unlikely to improve matters.
The emphasis on career over family when children are very young is a mistake imo. Small children should have rights too.
As it happens my son undertakes most of the dropping off and collecting….and yes he wasn’t too happy either at the poor care in nursery.

Please provide evidence of a link between mental health and nurseries for young children. All the evidence I found suggests that there isn't one or, if anything, children who have been in nurseries have better mental health. But I'm happy to be proved wrong, if you really do have reliable evidence.

Casdon Fri 18-Oct-24 13:48:47

Very few hints have been dropped about what is actually in the budget, so as it stands so much is purely speculation. It’s certainly keeping the media busy though, I’m not sure how many times I can be bothered with articles that say she may do x and the consequence will be y, it’s like Groundhog Day. I’ll be glad when it’s over.

Wyllow3 Fri 18-Oct-24 13:44:51

In the Guardian reports Reeves says the plans are different in some respects, but we are short on the actual plans to comment.

I know from previous reading that Tory plans were to end ESA, so all benefits claimants get the same (ie JSA). ESA pays slightly more. This could be the moves mentioned.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 18-Oct-24 12:33:31

And in today’s news:

Rachel Reeves will seek to make about £3bn of cuts to welfare over the next four years by restricting access to sickness benefits, it is understood, according to the PA news agency.

The Chancellor is expected to commit to the previous Tory government’s plans to save the sum by reforming work capability rules, as first reported by the Telegraph."

Also reported by the FT and the Times.

Mollygo Fri 18-Oct-24 10:46:52

Galaxy

Yes it was Scandinavian provision I was thinking of, it is often used as a benchmark or stick to beat people with, however you want to view itgrin. If I was in charge, I wouldnt have ratios, I would have size of group. So no larger than group of 8 in one room (less for under ones) I dont think adding adults to a large group always helps. But we are getting into the intricacies of early years now. And again not the labour party's fault.

I’m not familiar with the Scandinavian practices, but the biggest impact for me was the Reggio Emilia preschool provision in Italy.
We tried really hard to introduce some of their ideas in our pre-school and early years, before the EYFS. The biggest issue was difference in staffing ratios between what they expected and what we could afford to provide.

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 10:27:48

Doodledog just a few points. Excellent childcare is very sought after in my location and we did have an outstanding child minder from age 1 until 3. It was then thought that my grandson at 3 should start nursery, outstanding at the time and downgraded to good however.
So that was a very poor decision as it happens.
I then heard Bridget Phillipson on tv and I am a lone voice obviously asking about the latest developments in expanding nursery education. I also noticed that child mental health is deteriorating.
I feel that life in the Uk is becoming very difficult for a lot of families and the current government is unlikely to improve matters.
The emphasis on career over family when children are very young is a mistake imo. Small children should have rights too.
As it happens my son undertakes most of the dropping off and collecting….and yes he wasn’t too happy either at the poor care in nursery.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 10:25:40

Galaxy

Yes it was Scandinavian provision I was thinking of, it is often used as a benchmark or stick to beat people with, however you want to view itgrin. If I was in charge, I wouldnt have ratios, I would have size of group. So no larger than group of 8 in one room (less for under ones) I dont think adding adults to a large group always helps. But we are getting into the intricacies of early years now. And again not the labour party's fault.

I agree that it's not the Labour Party's fault. However, it is a political issue because high quality provision costs money, which those individuals who need it most can't always afford, so the state has to intervene with some kind of subsidies.

For some parents, the only choice is nursery or a stay-at-home parent with all the negative effects on the parents (and children, if the parents are dysfunctional). Given that nurseries are the better option for many, it's important that they should be high quality.

From what I know, Scandinavians have a different attitude to supporting others in their societies, which maybe explains why they prioritise childcare and education.

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 10:05:47

Yes it was Scandinavian provision I was thinking of, it is often used as a benchmark or stick to beat people with, however you want to view itgrin. If I was in charge, I wouldnt have ratios, I would have size of group. So no larger than group of 8 in one room (less for under ones) I dont think adding adults to a large group always helps. But we are getting into the intricacies of early years now. And again not the labour party's fault.