Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(432 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:55:19

Doodledog

ronib

Honestly it’s getting a bit uptight on GNet today. I don’t want to start a thread without more information. So a future project for me. Do go ahead without me.
MaizieD

Uptight? Wasn't your choice of language when you said that mothers 'dump their babies with strangers as according to the diktat of our new government' deliberately inflammatory?

Apart from there being no 'diktat', and the fact that babies and children also have fathers, I very much doubt that any parent 'dumps' their babies with anyone. You say your grandchildren use childcare - are they 'dumped' there? Is that where your prejudice comes from? I can assure you that most parents do a lot of research into childcare before choosing the best way forward for their families.

It is becoming impossible to discuss politics on these threads because of the jibes, sniping and general tone of nastiness.

Well said Doodledog.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:54:06

Galaxy

Yes I agree, currently lots of very young workers, who as soon as they realise the pay and conditions are probably better in Aldi, jump ship. It is also a societal issue that is difficult for a government to unpick. My guess is the role of early years staff is held in higher esteem in other European countries as their provision is frequently viewed as very high quality.

I'm not so sure whether European providers are always better. From what I know, Scandinavian countries tend to prioritise the early years, but I know a number of people who criticise French provision. For a start, they don't have the staff ratio which is compulsory in the UK and their methods aren't very child-friendly.

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 09:52:20

ronib

Honestly it’s getting a bit uptight on GNet today. I don’t want to start a thread without more information. So a future project for me. Do go ahead without me.
MaizieD

Uptight? Wasn't your choice of language when you said that mothers 'dump their babies with strangers as according to the diktat of our new government' deliberately inflammatory?

Apart from there being no 'diktat', and the fact that babies and children also have fathers, I very much doubt that any parent 'dumps' their babies with anyone. You say your grandchildren use childcare - are they 'dumped' there? Is that where your prejudice comes from? I can assure you that most parents do a lot of research into childcare before choosing the best way forward for their families.

It is becoming impossible to discuss politics on these threads because of the jibes, sniping and general tone of nastiness.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:51:45

Galaxy

Oops. A judgement on how people raise children. Except it's not really a judgement, it's trying to look at the optimum outcomes for children.
We and our children are highly unlikely to be the first generations who dont raise our children in a way that future generations regard as inadequate. To be fair I dont hold the labour party responsible for any of this.

Good point! The way children are raised is a fascinating topic. Over the years, it's been influenced by many factors, including psychological, ideological and religious ones and the stage at which children have their own rights and how much they should be punished. There are so many questions and I doubt very much whether there will ever be a 'right answer'. Meanwhile, parenting is stressful and most people I know muddle along doing the best they can, however much they thought they had planned.

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 09:50:12

Yes I agree, currently lots of very young workers, who as soon as they realise the pay and conditions are probably better in Aldi, jump ship. It is also a societal issue that is difficult for a government to unpick. My guess is the role of early years staff is held in higher esteem in other European countries as their provision is frequently viewed as very high quality.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:45:52

Galaxy

There is an ongoing recruitment and retention issue in early years, again I would say many private nurseries are not high quality provision. We can take this personally if we want, in terms of how we raised our own children, but I dont see how that helps. It's fine for people to have opinions on how children are brought up, 'extreme' comments on either side of the debate will make no difference to the quality of care children are receiving.

I accept your points. I know my children were fortunate because their nursery was excellent. I can't even think of any way it could have been improved. I think a priority should be to make sure that all nurseries really do provide high quality care.

I know that recruitment can be difficult, so there needs to be a national strategy to increase the status (and pay) of early years providers (as well as social care for elderly and vulnerable adults, but that's another issue). IMO there needs to be a shift in public opinion towards the importance of caring and what kind of society we want - not always measured by financial balance sheet outcomes.

Whitewavemark2 Fri 18-Oct-24 09:43:48

Budget

Don’t forget that this is at present only part of the packages being given consideration. Undoubtedly representation is being made by interested parties as well as the minister of the appropriate departments.

Rayner is fighting her corner very fiercely - social housing.

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 09:40:52

Oops. A judgement on how people raise children. Except it's not really a judgement, it's trying to look at the optimum outcomes for children.
We and our children are highly unlikely to be the first generations who dont raise our children in a way that future generations regard as inadequate. To be fair I dont hold the labour party responsible for any of this.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:38:28

GrannyGravy13

growstuff

All the evidence I found suggests that even very young children benefit from interaction with a range of people, including carers and other children. High quality childcare is one way that can be provided.

I agree with you on this.

We used a combination of childcare for our brood (no family members within a two hour car/plane journey)

Over the years we have had an au-pair, disastrous.
Part-time Nanny, wonderful, we are still in touch with her.
Private Nursery in tandem with Nanny.
The youngest went to a Montessori pre-school which provided breakfast, lunch and tea so I could drop off at 8.45 and pick up at 5pm three days a week, and juggle the other two if I needed to be in the office.

I earned enough to afford for my children to be in nursery full-time, so I was lucky. If I hadn't, the only option would have been to give up work, which would have affected my children and me. The children wouldn't have had such a rich upbringing and would have been stuck at home with a mother, who would have seriously struggled to make ends meet. I would have lost out on pension contributions and the money I earned and would now have even greater financial problems than I now have. I've no doubt I would have been stigmatised by those who look down on unemployed single parents and resent the payment of benefits.

I know it's anecdotal, but my children loved nursery. I was an older mother, so didn't have friends with children of the same age. My children are still in contact with some of their early friends. The transition to primary school was easier for them than it was for many other children. They always came home to a mother who prioritised and interacted with them until they went to bed (after story telling).

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 09:37:14

The absence of fathers for example seems to have a detrimental impact on the welfare of boys in particular, there you go a judgement on how peol

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 09:34:13

Honestly it’s getting a bit uptight on GNet today. I don’t want to start a thread without more information. So a future project for me. Do go ahead without me.
MaizieD

Galaxy Fri 18-Oct-24 09:30:02

There is an ongoing recruitment and retention issue in early years, again I would say many private nurseries are not high quality provision. We can take this personally if we want, in terms of how we raised our own children, but I dont see how that helps. It's fine for people to have opinions on how children are brought up, 'extreme' comments on either side of the debate will make no difference to the quality of care children are receiving.

MaizieD Fri 18-Oct-24 09:29:48

ronib

MaizieD well actually there is today. I have a family celebration to organise. Plus picking up grandson from his nursery…., which he enjoys as a 4 year old.

It takes no longer to start a thread than it does to post on a thread.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:25:55

ronib

MaizieD well actually there is today. I have a family celebration to organise. Plus picking up grandson from his nursery…., which he enjoys as a 4 year old.

You'd better tell the government's policy makers that you're too busy to contribute to decisions about national policy making.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 09:24:13

ronib

Growstuff best start another thread?

Maybe you should have thought of that when you gave us your opinion about how children should be brought up.

It's actually pertinent to the budget, if changes are made which affect work opportunities for parents. Changes could also affect the life chances of children in general.

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 09:22:42

MaizieD well actually there is today. I have a family celebration to organise. Plus picking up grandson from his nursery…., which he enjoys as a 4 year old.

MaizieD Fri 18-Oct-24 09:20:00

ronib

Growstuff best start another thread?

There's nothing stopping you starting one

GrannyGravy13 Fri 18-Oct-24 09:01:38

growstuff

All the evidence I found suggests that even very young children benefit from interaction with a range of people, including carers and other children. High quality childcare is one way that can be provided.

I agree with you on this.

We used a combination of childcare for our brood (no family members within a two hour car/plane journey)

Over the years we have had an au-pair, disastrous.
Part-time Nanny, wonderful, we are still in touch with her.
Private Nursery in tandem with Nanny.
The youngest went to a Montessori pre-school which provided breakfast, lunch and tea so I could drop off at 8.45 and pick up at 5pm three days a week, and juggle the other two if I needed to be in the office.

TerriBull Fri 18-Oct-24 09:00:49

"Any increase in fuel prices will be passed on down the line and will end up with higher prices for everything"

If the rumoured hike in fuel prices become a reality then inflation will inevitably rise.

"I would like to see the Chancellor be more pro active in getting the likes of Amazon and Google to pay their fair share of taxes here in the UK"

Couldn't agree more.

Extra NI for employers, could be counter productive, in that unemployment will possibly rise as a result of that.

ronib Fri 18-Oct-24 08:58:45

Growstuff best start another thread?

Doodledog Fri 18-Oct-24 08:57:23

I am inclined to agree that IHT on farms seems wrong, unless there are ways to call land agricultural and evade tax? If so, maybe tighten the loopholes, but a blanket tax doesn’t seem helpful.

Definitely tax (or ban) vapes.

I would support rises in fuel tax, but not before a huge rise in investment in public transport to level the rest of the country up to London levels. I’d like people to think twice before using cars, but that only makes sense if there are plenty of cheap, clean and reliable buses.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 08:53:08

All the evidence I found suggests that even very young children benefit from interaction with a range of people, including carers and other children. High quality childcare is one way that can be provided.

growstuff Fri 18-Oct-24 08:49:02

ronib

Growstuff but the pro nursery lobby is also biased.

That's why I asked for unbiased research (not that I consider Oxford University biased).

The issue is that people like Jenet Erickson are ideologically biased. They're not guided by research, which the Oxford University report is.

GrannyGravy13 Fri 18-Oct-24 08:27:43

Sorry RR, I am 100% against IT on farms, this could be the end for many small to mid range farms here in the U.K. The same with IT on businesses, especially as the tax has to be paid within six months of death and before probate. If this is in the budget I foresee SME’s closing up and down the land.

Any increase in fuel prices will be passed on down the line and end up with higher prices of everything for the end user (us)

I am nit a fan if employers paying extra NI, for obvious reasons (SME’s shouldering the burden once again)

I would have liked to see the chancellor be more pro-active in getting the likes of Amazon, Google etc., to pay their fair share of taxes here in the U.K.

I am all for taxing vapes, and no doubt the excise duty on alcohol will be increased.

With all the spending plans the £1.1 billion saved on withdrawing the WFA and the optics surrounding it are minuscule and unnecessary.

Whitewavemark2 Fri 18-Oct-24 07:42:25

Tax under consideration.

Here are the tax raising options under consideration:
Capital gains tax
Reeves has been exploring a rise in capital gains tax (CGT) since before the general election, as revealed by the Guardian. About £15bn a year is raised, paid by about 350,000 people each year – and the majority coming from a small subset of super-rich individuals.
CGT is levied on the increase in the value of an asset in the period between its purchase and disposal. Various rates apply on the sale of different assets, including residential property, shares and carried interest earned by private equity fund managers.
At present, the top rate of income tax is 45%, but most types of capital gain are taxed at 20% and can be as low as 10%. The chancellor could raise up to £14bn by bringing the rates into line with income tax bands, but she could opt for a narrower set of changes to raise about £8bn.
Non-dom tax reforms
Labour’s manifesto included measures to raise £5.2bn in extra revenue from closing further loopholes in the non-dom tax regime, building on changes made by Jeremy Hunt in the March 2024 budget.
The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast that scrapping the tax break for wealthy foreigners could raise about £3.2bn a year, but warned this was a “highly uncertain” figure as the super-rich could either leave Britain or find ways to avoid the tax.
It emerged last month that Treasury officials feared Labour’s additional measures could end up losing the exchequer £1bn, rather than bringing in more money. It is thought the chancellor is reconsidering her plans.
Inheritance tax
About £8bn a year is raised by inheritance tax, with the levy typically paid on the estates of about 5% of annual deaths – the wealthiest estates in Britain. The chancellor could close several loopholes. The Resolution Foundation thinktank has suggested bringing pension pots into scope, and ending business and agricultural reliefs, to raise up to £2bn.
Reeves could go further by ending the complicated residence nil-band rate, introduced in 2017, which provides an extra tax-free allowance if a main residence is left to a direct descendent. This could raise a further £2bn.
Employer national insurance contributions
There are two options for the chancellor. First, levying employer national insurance contributions (NICs) on pensions contributions. The Resolution Foundation estimates this could raise £18bn, but because it would also hit public-sector employers, they would need to be reimbursed – reducing the net gain to about £12bn.
The second would be a straightforward increase in the rate of NICs paid by employers. Employers pay NICs for most workers earning more than £9,100 a year, paying the equivalent of 13.8% on earnings above the threshold.
HM Revenue and Customs estimates a one percentage point increase in the rate would bring in almost £9bn by 2027-28.
The chancellor has strongly hinted she could do this. However, she has faced criticism that this could break Labour’s manifesto pledge, with warnings workers would ultimately pay the price through lower wages. Reeves could, though, argue that businesses, not “working people”, would shoulder the cost.
‘Sin’ taxes
Ministers are understood to be considering a tax increase of up to £3bn on the gambling sector, after a report by the centre-left IPPR thinktank suggested the move in September among key recommendations for tackling Britain’s health challenges.
Fuel duty
Successive Conservative chancellors have frozen fuel duty since 2011, handing a generous tax break to motorists, while depriving the exchequer of a total of about £100bn in foregone revenue. Rishi Sunak also launched a temporary 5p fuel duty cut in 2022 to address the cost of living crisis, which has been extended twice and is due to expire in March next year.
The default government position is that the temporary cut ends and fuel duty will rise in line with retail price inflation next spring. For this reason, allowing a rise wouldn’t help to plug the chancellor’s forecast budget deficit – because the OBR already assumes the tax rate will go back up automatically.
Reeves is under heavy pressure to freeze the rate from motoring groups. But doing so would come at a serious cost. Cancelling the scheduled rises would be worth £4.8bn, according to the Resolution Foundation.