Gransnet forums

News & politics

Governments First Budget

(565 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Wed 30-Oct-24 07:55:04

We won’t know too much until we can read tomorrows analysis , but we do know of this government’s intended direction of travel, and whether it meets with our expectations as voters and what we all voted for, which of course changes with each individual.

My vote and expectation was for

First and foremost to save our NHS and crumbling public services.

Second was to address the state of our environment, the polluted seas and rivers, and the lack of diversity.

Next -to address the fact that economic growth has been more or less stagnant since 2010. We need a Keynesian type budget for growth, that is imaginative and forward thinking to produce the revenue to invest in out country.

Personally I have never thought it possible to have this type of successful economy where citizens can be confident of a cradle to grave welfare state, where education is first class, health is free at the point of use and available within a very reasonable time limit, where public services are well run and invested in and care for all in need comes as a right, can be obtained by the tax payer on the cheap. This type of economy must be paid for and we will need to see tax at Scandinavian levels in order to achieve this.

Looking at the state the country is in, we knew in July that this would be a mighty task. Mighty tasks need research/planning and massive effort. They always start painfully slowly but momentum will gather as each year passes and we will gradually see the result of the effort put in to save our country from the ravages of 14 long years of economic blows our public services received.

Of course the right wing media - childlike - is insisting on jam today without spending any of their pocket money, but as wise parents we know that all jam does is rot your teeth. Instant gratification is only for the hard of thinking, the more intelligent know that time is the master.

So now looking back at the few short months Labour has been in government, i am pretty supportive of the direction of travel, and the achievements to date - which probably need listing to remind everyone - but not for this thread.

Some stuff has been announced but I think it best until we begin to see how it fits into the overall picture before we begin to comment.

It looks as if this is going to be a massive budget though - so hold onto your hats!

vegansrock Sun 03-Nov-24 12:56:35

How many farmers voted for Brexit? The biggest drain on our finances for decades.

David49 Sun 03-Nov-24 13:02:18

MaizieD

^Yes they run the world - because they have the money to lend us, to provide the services we want/need.^

You so prove my point about reverencing the rich, David. grin

They only have this excessive amount of money because they have extracted it from the less rich in the first place. Or have inherited wealth initially extracted from the less rich. And they only 'lend' it to any country if they see the prospect of their 'loan' making them richer by way of interest rates and dividends.

As far as providing goods and services is concerned, in the UK a great number of 'goods and services' were perfectly well provided by state owned and run companies until the tories, in the thrall of money worshipping, decided that they should be in private hands. Well, a lot of people have become extremely wealthy as a result of that, but look at the state of many of our former public services...

Maisie, there are those that want to maximize the return they get regardless, most want to retain the value of their money, keeping up with inflation. Over the years you need probably 4% return to retain the value of your money, there are few investments that will achieve that. Your house is one of those because growth isn’t taxed.

MaizieD Sun 03-Nov-24 13:20:41

vegansrock

How many farmers voted for Brexit? The biggest drain on our finances for decades.

It was, apparently, about 50/50. The few farmers I know voted Remain and knew that Brexit was going to be a disaster for farmers.

For a start, many farmers depended on the Single Farm Payment to keep afloat. The Brexit substitute is nothing like as good.

David49 Sun 03-Nov-24 15:54:03

MaizieD

vegansrock

How many farmers voted for Brexit? The biggest drain on our finances for decades.

It was, apparently, about 50/50. The few farmers I know voted Remain and knew that Brexit was going to be a disaster for farmers.

For a start, many farmers depended on the Single Farm Payment to keep afloat. The Brexit substitute is nothing like as good.

Turkeys voting for Christmas for sure, they believed the rubbish Johnson et al were spreading, of the farmers I know most voted for Brexit. The CAP was good for farmers and food security, a massive own goal.

MayBee70 Sun 03-Nov-24 16:34:03

Te NFU advised them to vote remain I believe. But when we were in Yorkshire there were give us our country back placards in farmers fields everywhere which must have influenced many people. Just as there are always vote Conservative placards in their fields when it’s an election. So they do unfairly wield a wider influence imo. Anyway, wasn’t Brexit all about our fisherman as well? That didn’t go well did it? #theelephantinthe room

Dickens Sun 03-Nov-24 16:51:27

MaizieD

^Yes they run the world - because they have the money to lend us, to provide the services we want/need.^

You so prove my point about reverencing the rich, David. grin

They only have this excessive amount of money because they have extracted it from the less rich in the first place. Or have inherited wealth initially extracted from the less rich. And they only 'lend' it to any country if they see the prospect of their 'loan' making them richer by way of interest rates and dividends.

As far as providing goods and services is concerned, in the UK a great number of 'goods and services' were perfectly well provided by state owned and run companies until the tories, in the thrall of money worshipping, decided that they should be in private hands. Well, a lot of people have become extremely wealthy as a result of that, but look at the state of many of our former public services...

"The Great Money Trick - Robert Tressell (The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists - April 1914)

libcom.org/article/great-money-trick-robert-tressell

escaped Sun 03-Nov-24 17:05:01

I'm in Cornwall for a couple of weeks, and it occurred to me that Prince George will be OK - Duchy of Cornwall- because his father's estate will be completely exempt from IHT. I think it's around 21 farms.
Not fair really, but that's the rules.

LizzieDrip Sun 03-Nov-24 17:31:29

“Prince George will be OK - Duchy of Cornwall- because his father's estate will be completely exempt from IHT. I think it's around 21 farms. Not fair really, but that's the rules.”

Well, those rules absolutely need changing! It’s a disgrace that the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster profit from the public sector i.e. the taxpayer, and they’re exempt from the taxes that others have to pay.

The C4 Dispatches programme highlighted this brilliantly. The King and William could right these wrongs - if they chose to. Shame on them!

MaizieD Sun 03-Nov-24 17:57:18

The King and William are doing nothing different from every wealthy landowner. They are maximising the profit that can be extracted from their holdings.

But, part of the 'mystique of the monarchy that has been peddled for centuries is that a monarch has duty of care for the wellbeing of all their subjects. The monarch represented by their government in Parliament has set up caring institutions such as schools and hospitals. But is charging rent for the land they are on! Surely caring institutions of the State should, morally, be rent free?

David49 Sun 03-Nov-24 19:41:49

Most of great estates were broken up by “Death Duty” after WW1, those that remain are held in trusts or have given their mansions and art collections to the NT in lieu of taxation. The family living in more modest circumstances and earning a living from other occupations.
The tentacles of aristocracy do dominate high finance and politics so don’t underestimate their influence, while they manipulate the money we want to borrow that will continue.

M0nica Sun 03-Nov-24 21:35:15

Yes, trusts have been set u and estates set up a limited companies, thus protecting them from death duties, but the beneficiaries of these trusts/ltd companies are still the family members. Look how wealthy the Duke of Westminster is!

I am not remotely jealous, nor would I change these things. I like the sense of continuity that comes from the long association between a given family and certain county or county town.

David49 Mon 04-Nov-24 09:24:58

Duke of Westminster is a good example, he rich but a long way from the idle rich, he has a massively commercial property business. The large estates that have survived are run on very commercial lines, the ones I know have many diversified enterprises, and probably provide more jobs than they did before WW1

Until we are able to pay for our own housing and services we have to live with those that provide finance and property for us. It’s like car dealers, most of us hate them, but if you want a new car you have to deal with them. Maybe in the future the UK will somehow prosper so that the nation can provide housing, health and all the other services without borrowing. Until then we have to live with those that lend us money, demonize them if it makes you feel better but that changes nothing.

MaizieD Mon 04-Nov-24 09:34:48

@ MOnica and David.

All I can say is "Blimey! Do be gentle with the firelock tugging. At our age we really don't want to lose any more hair" 😂

MaizieD Mon 04-Nov-24 09:37:27

Bugger. Caught the typo too late

forelock, not firelock. What a sarcasm failure blush

LizzieDrip Mon 04-Nov-24 09:43:55

Totally agree MaizieD.

ronib Mon 04-Nov-24 10:04:43

I don’t quite get the idea that the upper classes have a right to so many privileges whilst the underclass or the vast majority of the population have fewer by the day in terms of inheritance laws at least. I include the Royal Family in the first category obviously.

David49 Mon 04-Nov-24 10:20:26

I can tug my forelock if I benefit from it, successful people do.
I don’t envy them, I don’t like or dislike them, there are good and bad.

In business I have had to deal with cleaners on minimum wage, right up to estate owners worth £100m plus, for me the only requirement is are they honest, because if I suspect they aren’t I walk away. I could never do a deal with Trump or Johnson or many others because I have decided they are crooks and I would never sleep at night.

M0nica Mon 04-Nov-24 10:24:51

I am not forelock tugging. I am just saying I am not bothered by people being rich. I also have a strong sense of history.

You are just letting your prejudices get in the way of your judgements.

Allira Mon 04-Nov-24 10:28:27

I'm going to get my forelock trimmed today.
There may not be enough left to tug. 👩

eddiecat78 Mon 04-Nov-24 10:29:55

vegansrock

How many farmers voted for Brexit? The biggest drain on our finances for decades.

Well we were farming at the time and most definitely did not vote for Brexit - not did anyone I know

Whitewavemark2 Mon 04-Nov-24 10:34:58

escaped

I'm in Cornwall for a couple of weeks, and it occurred to me that Prince George will be OK - Duchy of Cornwall- because his father's estate will be completely exempt from IHT. I think it's around 21 farms.
Not fair really, but that's the rules.

It is much more than that they own huge swathes of the west country plus other parts of the U.K..

David49 Mon 04-Nov-24 10:36:05

I think prejudices do hold people back, and the lack of personal responsibility, wanting to always blame someone else for your problems.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 04-Nov-24 10:39:14

It isn’t a question of jealousy - it is a question of fairness and equality.

That old chestnut is constantly wheeled out whenever anyone brings the issue up.

It is rubbish.

As an aside all the brexiter voting farmers must have been in our part of the world. Everywhere you went in the countryside there were huge Brexit posters.

Allira Mon 04-Nov-24 10:41:23

Whitewavemark2

It isn’t a question of jealousy - it is a question of fairness and equality.

That old chestnut is constantly wheeled out whenever anyone brings the issue up.

It is rubbish.

As an aside all the brexiter voting farmers must have been in our part of the world. Everywhere you went in the countryside there were huge Brexit posters.

As an aside all the brexiter voting farmers must have been in our part of the world. Everywhere you went in the countryside there were huge Brexit posters.

I thought they were all in Wales!!

The idea, I think, was that they would get rid of all the bureaucracy involved with the EU. Be careful what you wish for.

LizzieDrip Mon 04-Nov-24 10:42:32

David why should the monarchy be exempt from IHT & CGT?