Gransnet forums

News & politics

Donald and Elon: two immature guys running the entire US economy.

(161 Posts)
mae13 Thu 14-Nov-24 10:34:49

You couldn't make it up.

Never was a clichè more appropriate........

nanna8 Sat 16-Nov-24 05:34:16

The one I would be most worried about is Kennedy if I lived there. He sounds like an absolute fruit loop. Why on earth did Trump choose him? Perhaps he wants to reduce the population by not vaccinating and spreading diseases? I’m not joking, either.

Jannicans Fri 15-Nov-24 20:10:04

Trumps grandfather was a loser, his father made the money and had to rescue Donald from his business failures on several occasions. They are a very racist family.

MaizieD Fri 15-Nov-24 20:05:31

I know he said he would ‘end inflation’ but whilst it might sound lovely, it means nothing, and I’ve not seen any proposals that give any credence to it.

One of the conclusions drawn by many economists is that inflation usually goes away on its own...

MaizieD Fri 15-Nov-24 20:02:34

Arto1s

Let’s resurrect this post in 6 months shall we; maybe then we will be able to comment on what Trump and Musk have achieved or not achieved. How can any of you know what is going to happen?

We can predict what will happen because of the little thing called 'experience'. Not necessarily personal experience, but the accumulation of knowledge from past events. It's about looking at similar past policies and seeing what their effect was. The analysis of experts in many fields.

Which might lead us to the definition of insanity 'Doing the same thing over again and expecting the result to be different'.

JaneJudge Fri 15-Nov-24 19:52:48

It’s devolution for people who don’t have wealth, health or education

Deedaa Fri 15-Nov-24 19:36:25

With regard to how much better off Americans are compared with us, I can only say that my American son in law has been over here for 30 years and has no intention of going back. With the health problems he's had during the last 10 years be would be bankrupt and homeless by now if he'd had to rely on American "health care"

JuBut Fri 15-Nov-24 19:23:55

You're right, UK down the swanny

Wyllow3 Fri 15-Nov-24 18:54:56

Because we are interested, above all, so why not discuss it?

Its relevant to us in the UK, economically and security wise, because of the Ukraine and Israel, and because the figures involved are "larger than life"......

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Fri 15-Nov-24 17:42:54

Good idea to let some water pass under the bridge and see how things are in 6 months’ time as Artols suggests. We just speculate otherwise and as we know ‘even the economists’ get things wrong. It’s the ‘unknown unknowns’ as Rumsfeld said once.

Jeanathome Fri 15-Nov-24 17:36:40

Kayteetay1

The UK is very dependent on the USA. This swing to the Musk/Trump right undemocratic moronic undiplomatic presidency wise is likely to have a massive negative economic and security effect on not just the UK but the planet itself. Musk has literally bought the US presidency to further his power rush. I hope the terrible consequences I foresee are proven wrong.

And yet, jubilation from some.

Arto1s Fri 15-Nov-24 17:04:58

Let’s resurrect this post in 6 months shall we; maybe then we will be able to comment on what Trump and Musk have achieved or not achieved. How can any of you know what is going to happen?

Greyduster Fri 15-Nov-24 17:01:54

When I worked at MOD, and similarly when DH did, it was widely acknowledged that even the most inept civil servants didn’t get sacked - they simply got moved aside. There were people there who were long past retirement age but just kept hanging on - I worked with a couple of them.
The MOD also employs a good many retired military officers in various roles where they employ their former expertise.

spabbygirl Fri 15-Nov-24 16:56:09

Bellzy

Why do you think that? If protectionist tarriffs are imposed as Trump has said they will be, then the cost of all imported goods in the US will rise. A vast amount of the public purse will be funnelled to loyalists involved in the construction and running of detention centres; recent improvements to medical insurance costs and the reduction of costs of some drugs are likely to be reversed and the only tax cut actually planned is to corporation tax.
Whilst aid to places like Ukraine may well be cut, it’s unlikely that Trump will stop shoring up Israel, and very likely that the YS will massively increase the military presence and aid in Taiwan and possibly S Korea.
The child tax credits and changes to Medicare that were proposed by Harris to allow insurance to cover care in the home is unlikely to be taken up by Trump.
If Musk has his way and starts to try to busts the unions then goodness knows what that leads to by way of strikes and industrial action.
And if it is honestly the intent to try to save 2 trillion in government spending, that sounds like a lot of jobs.
So I’m always at a bit of a loss to understand why people think Trump is somehow going to make ordinary peoples’ finances any better.
I know he said he would ‘end inflation’ but whilst it might sound lovely, it means nothing, and I’ve not seen any proposals that give any credence to it.

well said Bellzy, it may be that the USA population has a wake up call once Trump has been in power a while in the same way that we did with Johnson, a slick talker does not necessarily make a popular president.

Frenchgalinspain Fri 15-Nov-24 16:43:03

Cossy

Ladyleftfieldlover

Very succinctly put and I agree 100%, particularly re Liz “Lettuce” Truss.

As far as D.T. and his family go, you are 100% correct without a doubt in my mind.

Bellzy Fri 15-Nov-24 16:01:42

Why do you think that? If protectionist tarriffs are imposed as Trump has said they will be, then the cost of all imported goods in the US will rise. A vast amount of the public purse will be funnelled to loyalists involved in the construction and running of detention centres; recent improvements to medical insurance costs and the reduction of costs of some drugs are likely to be reversed and the only tax cut actually planned is to corporation tax.
Whilst aid to places like Ukraine may well be cut, it’s unlikely that Trump will stop shoring up Israel, and very likely that the YS will massively increase the military presence and aid in Taiwan and possibly S Korea.
The child tax credits and changes to Medicare that were proposed by Harris to allow insurance to cover care in the home is unlikely to be taken up by Trump.
If Musk has his way and starts to try to busts the unions then goodness knows what that leads to by way of strikes and industrial action.
And if it is honestly the intent to try to save 2 trillion in government spending, that sounds like a lot of jobs.
So I’m always at a bit of a loss to understand why people think Trump is somehow going to make ordinary peoples’ finances any better.
I know he said he would ‘end inflation’ but whilst it might sound lovely, it means nothing, and I’ve not seen any proposals that give any credence to it.

Wyllow3 Fri 15-Nov-24 15:55:05

👏 Good post, I couldn't have got that together.

Skitterbug Fri 15-Nov-24 15:51:21

How will Trump be better than Biden? Our annual inflation rate is down to about 2.2%. Our economy, which has produced record job growth of 15.7 million new jobs in less than four years, is now achieving the much desired “soft landing” — taming inflation while avoiding a recession and continuing growth. And wages have been growing faster than prices, so workers are feeling more positive about the economy.
Trump’s radical economic plan would endanger all the progress we have made. The former president proposes exorbitant tariffs on the imports of goods and services into the U.S. that would bring back high inflation. His so-called Maganomics would be a mega-disaster for American consumers and families.
Trump’s tariffs are “economic proposals that can actually cause inflation and put you into a recession – at the same time,” says David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management, calling them a “perfect stagflation machine.”
Even the deeply conservative National Interest publication says “Trump’s tariffs would be a disaster for America, sparking 20 percent inflation or more for many goods and burdening average consumers with high costs. The conservative Peterson Institute for International Economics estimates Trump’s plans could cost the average household $2,600 a year, with low-income Americans suffering most.
The Financial Times points out that Trump’s proposals are similar to the protectionist Smoot Hawley Tariff Act passed by Congress in the 1930s that helped prolong the Great Depression. The Times calls the Trump’s plans “a poison pill for the American people, the US economy and the world.”

And all those immigrants he plans to deport? Well, deporting millions of undocumented workers would mean that businesses will need to replace those laborers. With historically low unemployment, finding people willing to work for low pay could be difficult, and companies may need to advertise higher wages to attract workers to replace deported laborers.
Consumers would foot the bill if companies’ productivity slows or paychecks increase in the agriculture, construction and services sectors, which have a large number of undocumented workers.
In 2022 unauthorized immigrants contributed $46.8 billion in federal taxes, with $22.6 billion going to Social Security and $5.7 billion going to Medicare.
Unauthorized immigrants also paid $29.3 billion in state and local taxes.
The deportation plan itself could be enormously expensive. Trump recently told NBC News that “it’s not a question of a price tag” for his plans for militarized deportations. The average cost of apprehending, detaining, processing and removing one undocumented immigrant in 2016 was $10,900, according to figures released by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) at the time.
I just hope there's a way we can stop him from destroying one of the best economies in the world.

valdavi Fri 15-Nov-24 15:16:13

Employment prospects are the last thing to worry about with computers making decisions! & they won't want their decisions appealed, computers are never wrong you know [grin}]

David49 Fri 15-Nov-24 15:05:35

“Some times the technology did indeed enable us to access information we hadn't before and use to to good purpose, most of the time it merely generated reams of paperwork (from those nice printers attached to every computer) that was no use to anyone, but made the senior managers feel better and made more work for the people who had to generate it.”

You’re right it did generate a lot of paperwork most not needed but you did it anyway so that you had “evidence” of a transaction now that’s changing fast, you do everything on an IPad.
We opened a new bank account last year we were shown into a room given an IPad, follow the instructions as they come up, photographed the identification and it was done.
Banking has changed most of all, gone are the days you stood in a queue at the counter to pay cheques in, it’s all done online, if you do get the occasional cheque you feed it into the cash machine.
On holiday we never get foreign currency every thing is contactless, including buying an ice cream!, when I want a pint at the RugbyClub you can’t pay cash. Other industries are the same admin is digital, I fear for the employment prospects for graduates, decision making is going to be done by computers.

Whether that is a step forward or backwards I’m not sure but it is happening.

Kayteetay1 Fri 15-Nov-24 15:00:59

The UK is very dependent on the USA. This swing to the Musk/Trump right undemocratic moronic undiplomatic presidency wise is likely to have a massive negative economic and security effect on not just the UK but the planet itself. Musk has literally bought the US presidency to further his power rush. I hope the terrible consequences I foresee are proven wrong.

Wyllow3 Fri 15-Nov-24 14:58:33

Trump and Dad….

apnews.com/article/0452d29cd2564eaf97605ab90acc3a67

“NY Times: Trump got $413M from his dad, much from tax dodges”......

JanCl Fri 15-Nov-24 14:51:35

Why? HiscDad had to bail out his business and save him from bankruptcy because he overspent on vanity projects. Not my idea of a safe pair of financial hands.

Wyllow3 Fri 15-Nov-24 14:17:25

David49

“Why, for example, does the MoD require 63,000 civil servants, when the army is down to 72,000 and the Navy and RAF half that number each?”

The MOD certainly employ a lot of civilians mostly as contractors for back up roles, they are not “civil servants” as most understand.

Thank you for that clarity, I get fed up of figures being quoted that are unsourced for us to look at and not ultimately accurate.

Wyllow3 Fri 15-Nov-24 14:14:56

Blimey, what a shower! Jobs for the Boyz.

Maribr Fri 15-Nov-24 14:08:55

Trump has just appointed Kennedy , who is anti vaccination , with bizarre ideas on of other health issues , to be in charge of Health . God help America