So often it is not what you do, but the way that you do it.
And this is the problem with this government. They act first and think later. The removal of WFA was a disaster because it came out of the blue, without preparation or thought, and while better off pensioners can just shrug the loss of it off, those whose living standards, health and peace of mind depended on it, those whose income is just above pension credit level suddenly had a significant tranche of their income taken away, right at the start of winter, when it was most needed. Those affected had no chance to plan or prepare for less money for heating this winter.
The same with the tax on agricultural assets. Yes, there was good reason to remove it from the wealthiest estate owners, who will have already taken avoidance measures, but for small farm estates, or even some tenant farmers, the result could be disastrous, Breaking up small farms into unviably small parcels of land will do nothing to help new entrants into farming. The land will be sold to adjacent big estates or for housing - and how will that help new entrants into agriculture - assuming there are many.
The average age of farmers in the UK is 60, and this is not a British phenomena. From Kenya to Japan, the average age of farmers is around 60. The majority of young people, even in rural area do not want to work in agriculture. This new measure exacerbate the situation
Another case of act first, think later.
I find Spabbygirls callous dismissal of all those most seriously affected by the loss of the WFA and the agricultural assets tax quite troubling. Essentially she is saying 'I do not give a toss about the poor, as long as we tax the rich' Is this how Labour thinks? They should have told us.