Galaxy
And yet the electorate looked at a personality like Trump, looked at the Democrats and thought that's the least worse option. Would be useful for someone anyone to think about that.
Would be useful for someone anyone to think about that.
If you listen to those Americans who've been interviewed on the streets, it's not really difficult to understand the appeal of Trump to those who voted for him.
Not long ago an American (male) on social media was chiding me - well our country in fact - for its 'class system'. I was informed that only the people from the 'top' class can become "like, a president" and that in America, everyone has the chance to realise their dreams, regardless of their income. I suppose you could say that Kamala Harris' background was relatively middle-of-the-road, her childhood home looks comparatively modest and with her parents, both graduates following successful careers, she certainly wasn't from the $billionaire-class, though her wealth increased considerably when she married Doug Emhoff.
Both nations have a class-system though, they're just structured differently - ours has historical roots dating back to feudal times, theirs emerged from a revolutionary context, highlighting individualism and egalitarianism. And both have their working-class poor - and Trump, who loves the old, the young, the highly educated, the poorly educated (especially the poorly educated - though this comment was taken out of its original context when touted across the 'net), has promised all of them a better life when he makes America great again. That means a lot to those who are struggling on a weekly basis with their 'grocery bills' and at the 'gas-station'. Although overall Americans have a higher-income, they have a higher poverty rate, and that fact can't be overlooked when it comes to the time to vote.
Being the showman that he is - he talks in attractive sound-bites, when he's not stumbling over his phraseology - and that's forgivable when you are promising a whole section of society that their lives are going to be better, economically, and PDQ.
Better still - he's found the enemy - he's found the reason why America is faltering, and why huge swathes of the population are suffering economic decline. It's the cultural Marxists, the 'wokes', undocumented immigrants - and they are all either part of, or protected by, the Dems.
For those who are economically secure, he's promised a new golden age - a return to the 'homestead' values of God and family on which America was built - hard-working and successful. And they will be rewarded economically with lower tax bills as well as a return to the 'old' values.
The $billionaire class knows of course that their wealth will be protected.
He's going to change everyone's life in this new 'American Dream'. The religious, like him, genuinely believe that God saved him in order to save America.
Harris, unfortunately for her, couldn't unshackle herself from the unpopular Biden, and focused on women and women's rights - and she couldn't convince the American public - especially those riddled with apprehension about widespread economic anxiety.
Personally, I don't think America is yet ready for a female POTUS. The dominant hierarchy is largely male, paternalistic, and wedded to hearth-and-home values of 'old' America, and these values have filtered down through the ages.
So I'm not one bit surprised that Trump won - at face value, what the heck is there not to like, whichever strata of society you are from? The reality of course will be somewhat different to what's been promised, but that's not the question you posed.