Gransnet forums

News & politics

Trans women and single-sex spaces

(955 Posts)
RosieandherMaw Mon 14-Apr-25 07:58:00

Is this common sense at last?
From ‘The Times’ this morning
Organisations will be told that they can no longer call a space single-sex if they admit transgender people who do not have a gender recognition certificate.
Updated guidance from the equality watchdog will say that services described as being single-sex will not be able to make the claim if they also allow transgender women to use them on the basis of self-identification
Last week the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) sent ministers its updated code of practice, which guides organisations on how to apply the Equality Act. It is expected to be presented to parliament before the summer. The Times understands the recommendations include an overhaul of how single-sex spaces are defined.
A source said of the guidelines: “The upshot [of the guidance] means it's not lawful to have a self-ID service. The fact is that if you let a man in, it's no longer a single-sex service, and that includes trans people without GRCs [gender recognition certificates] .”
The change would prevent those who rely on self-ID from being able to access women-only care homes or domestic abuse refuges without an exceptional reason

My question is just why has this taken complicated legislation - and so long?

Carlotta Sun 20-Apr-25 21:44:53

Spike wasn't reporting on transpeople as a whole though were they? They only reported about the angry, violent, threatening, aggressive transpeople in the demonstration. They never mentioned the quiet, peaceful, law abiding transpeople who were probably sat at home watching cricket. Maybe you're expecting Spiked to lump all trans people one homogeneous mass, just as TRAs lump all women who'd prefer women only spaces as being transphobic? Is that fair?

Wyllow3 Sun 20-Apr-25 21:41:55

correction who behave like that.

Wyllow3 Sun 20-Apr-25 21:41:11

Carlotta I have made absolutely clear I do not support people who have like that. But I really do wonder how many demonstrations you've actually been on generally that have mostly peaceful people but a small minority ruin the whole proceedings by violence in words or deeds because it's not uncommon.
It's simply not the case that of the thousands there more than a minority were engaged in these activities. Just read across MSM as a whole not the biased "spiked"

Galaxy Sun 20-Apr-25 21:36:01

Yes the men use violent threats and we laugh at them. What is that old saying, women are scared men will kill them and men are scared women will laugh at them.

Wyllow3 Sun 20-Apr-25 21:30:14

Galaxy

Wyllow we have collated thousands of threats against women in this debate over the years. It is completely typical and what women have experienced again and again.

And I've read them, as you know. I was commenting on the particular demonstration but as above have made clear I don't disagree with you that some threats reach "hate speech" levels and possible criminal levels. And that I support women only spaces where appropriate and third spaces.

But I will call out reports like the one in spiked as trans people have the right to demonstrate and speak up without mockery, exaggeration, or spite as they dont represent transpeople as a whole.

Galaxy Sun 20-Apr-25 21:28:14

There are also named death threats against JK Rowling. Just so we are clear on my position, I view this in exactly the same way as I view the threat from Andrew Tate, in fact they worry me more, because they have more power and influence.

Carlotta Sun 20-Apr-25 21:22:19

predominantly peaceful demonstration

You think? Defacing 7 statues with graffiti and threatening slogan and causing criminal damage. Carrying placards with "KILL TERFS". Pissing up monuments, public buildings and statues. Carrying bags of urine to pour over public buildings. Shouting threats inciting violence towards "terfs". If you think that's peaceful, I'd hate to see what you'd consider violent and aggressive.

As for your distaste for Spiked; of course you think it's patronising and mocking; what else can you do but mock when men go out and pee up a wall to demonstrate what women they are! grin

Glasweegran Sun 20-Apr-25 21:15:25

FriedGreenTomatoes2

And now Angela Eagle and Chris Bryant exchanging WhatsApp messages yesterday saying this ruling ‘is catastrophic’.

What?

Be very careful now Labour … or ..
Whoosh - another million votes for Reform.

And you would vote for a party that is particularly regressive on women's rights (not to mention it's "blame everything on refugees... just don't look at the billionaires" stance).... because some people think the ruling was a bad move?
You feel voting for the party that aligns itself with Trump is going to help women's rights?

Galaxy Sun 20-Apr-25 21:14:54

Wyllow we have collated thousands of threats against women in this debate over the years. It is completely typical and what women have experienced again and again.

Rosie51 Sun 20-Apr-25 21:11:44

Just to add LizzieDrip Fionne reports no problems using men's toilets. Once a guy asked if 'she' was in the wrong loo, and on being told "I'm a man" replied "And a very pretty one" which pleased him no end. I don't follow Fionne because he's transgender but for other shared interests.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Sun 20-Apr-25 21:07:56

And now Angela Eagle and Chris Bryant exchanging WhatsApp messages yesterday saying this ruling ‘is catastrophic’.

What?

Be very careful now Labour … or ..
Whoosh - another million votes for Reform.

Rosie51 Sun 20-Apr-25 21:04:56

LizzieDrip

I am consistent Rosie.

Somewhat confused that the transman you follow uses the men’s toilet space?

Surely, as a woman, she should use women’s spaces🤔

Sorry, slip of the brain, Fionne Orlander is a transwoman. That's why I mentioned the pretty, feminine appearance.

I really think it would have been a whole lot easier and clearer if a transman had been a biological man who was transgender and a transwoman was a biological woman who was transgender.

Wyllow3 Sun 20-Apr-25 20:57:10

Carlotta, thats a highly biased and cherry picking version of what happened on a very large predominantly peaceful demonstration by a particular publication with a very particular slant. Spiked uses very patronising and mocking language is the giveaway, using words like "tantrum" and "wailed" and similar.

A google on "Spiked Trans" leads to a whole list of anti trans articles by this publication. Pretty clearly anti trans ideology per se.

Now I am not denying that the examples quoted and the photographs shown by FGT never happened, they clearly did. But they were extremists and should not be taken as typical.

And yes, where acts or signage or threats (just like anti semitic memes at the Palestine marches) are illegal and hate speech or actions, criminal proceedings should follow no get out clause because its trans.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Sun 20-Apr-25 20:22:53

We can hope.

Carlotta Sun 20-Apr-25 20:16:48

In 2024, Starmer said Criminals intent on causing violence and unrest on our streets will be stopped in their tracks thanks to a new National Violent Disorder Programme, the Prime Minister has announced today.

At a meeting of police chiefs in Downing Street this afternoon, he offered his clear backing to forces up and down the country - pledging that the government will work in direct partnership with them to stamp out the violent disorder seen in recent weeks.

Following the meeting, he has announced the immediate creation of the new programme, which will bring together the best policing capabilities from across the country to share intelligence on the activity of violent groups so the authorities can swiftly intervene to arrest them.

So...... can we look forward to seeing the current violent, aggressive and threatening demonstrators thrown into biologically appropriate prison cells?

Mollygo Sun 20-Apr-25 20:06:53

Luminance

Why would that man be hiding behind the sign like that? If you are going to do something so heinous, at least have the courage to show your face.

You really need to ask?

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Sun 20-Apr-25 20:04:31

Honestly Carlotta some of these men (who want to identify as women) are seriously unhinged. Mental health issues for sure. This anger is NOT normal. These men are frustrated, angry and downright dangerous.

Carlotta Sun 20-Apr-25 19:58:25

Interesting excerpt from today's Spiked: After being legally crucified by the Supreme Court last Wednesday, the trans faithful marched from Parliament Square in London yesterday in a display of devotion and defiance. It was a tantrum disguised as a protest over the court’s heresy – that the word ‘woman’ refers to a biological category, not a personal sense of gender.

Chanting ‘Fuck JK Rowling’ and ‘Fuck Wes Streeting’, the mob wailed over the apparent injustice of women having legally defined boundaries. Banners held included ‘The only good TERF is a dead one’; as *legal commentator Dennis Kavanagh pointed out, there are currently people in prison for saying less.*

He was followed by Sarah Jane (né Alan) Baker, a violent ex-con turned trans activist who in 2023 called for TERFs to be punched in the face and was reported to have removed his own balls in prison while doing a stretch for kidnap, torture and attempted murder.

Yeah; a peaceful demonstration by peaceable people who just want to live in peace. Not.

LizzieDrip Sun 20-Apr-25 19:52:20

I am consistent Rosie.

Somewhat confused that the transman you follow uses the men’s toilet space?

Surely, as a woman, she should use women’s spaces🤔

Smileless2012 Sun 20-Apr-25 19:37:02

Probably because he's a bully Luminance and all bullies are cowards aren't they.

I think it's fair to say that this subject is important to everyone who takes part in these discussions. Some of us have been doing so for years for a variety of reasons but the one we all have in common is it being important to us.

They're a disgrace FGT's.

Luminance Sun 20-Apr-25 19:15:31

Why would that man be hiding behind the sign like that? If you are going to do something so heinous, at least have the courage to show your face.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Sun 20-Apr-25 19:03:28

This ◀️ is what we are up against.
Aggressive TRactivists bullying behaviour. Despicable.

ViceVersa Sun 20-Apr-25 18:27:29

What about other violent crimes committed by transwomen, Glasweegran? Isla Bryson, Andrew Miller - to name but two off the top of my head? No-one has ever claimed it is 'all' transpeople, just as we recognise that it's not 'all men'.
However, it is also accepted that the statistics aren't always accurate, as conviction rates aren't always recorded on gender - and if they are, the 'trans' category tends to be classed as those who have undergone some form of surgery as opposed to those who simply self-identify as the opposite sex.

Mollygo Sun 20-Apr-25 18:26:44

Galaxy

Transwomen are men they are in the same group.

And it seems we’re back to excusing one type of appalling violence against women by TIM because it’s not as bad as another!

Next we’ll hear that the death threats by TRA against women weren’t seriously meant!

None of that makes harm to trans right. in Women are having to fight to protect women against the actions of TW/TRA, made so visible.
Surely Women can’t be held responsible for undoing the damage done to trans by the actions of TRA/TW.

Ilovecheese Sun 20-Apr-25 18:25:23

It's not just women who need a respite from men in refuges.
Some children are really terrified of men as a result of what they have witnessed at home. Their feelings should be considered.