Gransnet forums

News & politics

Trans women and single-sex spaces

(955 Posts)
RosieandherMaw Mon 14-Apr-25 07:58:00

Is this common sense at last?
From ‘The Times’ this morning
Organisations will be told that they can no longer call a space single-sex if they admit transgender people who do not have a gender recognition certificate.
Updated guidance from the equality watchdog will say that services described as being single-sex will not be able to make the claim if they also allow transgender women to use them on the basis of self-identification
Last week the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) sent ministers its updated code of practice, which guides organisations on how to apply the Equality Act. It is expected to be presented to parliament before the summer. The Times understands the recommendations include an overhaul of how single-sex spaces are defined.
A source said of the guidelines: “The upshot [of the guidance] means it's not lawful to have a self-ID service. The fact is that if you let a man in, it's no longer a single-sex service, and that includes trans people without GRCs [gender recognition certificates] .”
The change would prevent those who rely on self-ID from being able to access women-only care homes or domestic abuse refuges without an exceptional reason

My question is just why has this taken complicated legislation - and so long?

Mollygo Wed 16-Apr-25 12:03:34

Allira
😄😄
The Bee Gees just wouldn’t have sounded the same if they’ve been women.

Allira Wed 16-Apr-25 11:57:58

Knittingacat

Women's and men's voices are on a spectrum in terms of choir ranges. There are men who can sing soprano or alto, just as there are women who can sing alto or tenor (or rarely bass). So I can't see that gender identity would be a problem in a choir.

Men singing in a sopranist range are singing falsetto.

Women, too, can sing falsetto but, imo, it is not as pleasant to listen to as a male falsetto.

Mollygo Wed 16-Apr-25 11:56:29

Knittingacat

Women's and men's voices are on a spectrum in terms of choir ranges. There are men who can sing soprano or alto, just as there are women who can sing alto or tenor (or rarely bass). So I can't see that gender identity would be a problem in a choir.

IMO it would only be a problem if it was a women’s choir, which would mean men have to lie to join it. If you already have any I wouldn’t have known members (except you obviously do) with no problem so far, there’s probably no need to do anything.

Many of the new choirs starting up in the North West, including the one I go to, are mixed and you decide which range you prefer to sing, so if you want to be something you aren’t it doesn’t matter.

I agree with Lathyrus3 though, that they have a different timbre, but unless they’re singing solo, the audience are unlikely to know.

Allira Wed 16-Apr-25 11:54:07

Elegran

Rosie51

Doodledog

Sex, even grin

And in my excitement I put 'woman' instead of sex grin

A mere slip of the brain. That is nothing - in my post at 09:51:51 I put "woman" instead of "man", which made a pig's ear of the meaning of my whole post.

I did notice, but knew what you meant!

I'm the Queen of typos.

Doodledog Wed 16-Apr-25 11:51:58

Gender identity doesn't alter anyone's voice. Sex does.

Smileless2012 Wed 16-Apr-25 11:51:58

My experience is that a difference in timbre is more noticeable if a woman sings bass which as Knittingacat has said is rare.

Lathyrus3 Wed 16-Apr-25 11:38:16

Knittingacat

Women's and men's voices are on a spectrum in terms of choir ranges. There are men who can sing soprano or alto, just as there are women who can sing alto or tenor (or rarely bass). So I can't see that gender identity would be a problem in a choir.

You don’t think they have a different timbre regardless of range?

Knittingacat Wed 16-Apr-25 11:31:10

Women's and men's voices are on a spectrum in terms of choir ranges. There are men who can sing soprano or alto, just as there are women who can sing alto or tenor (or rarely bass). So I can't see that gender identity would be a problem in a choir.

Rosie51 Wed 16-Apr-25 11:10:47

Elegran

Rosie51

Doodledog

Sex, even grin

And in my excitement I put 'woman' instead of sex grin

A mere slip of the brain. That is nothing - in my post at 09:51:51 I put "woman" instead of "man", which made a pig's ear of the meaning of my whole post.

I didn't even notice, probably because I knew the case, so it read correctly to me.

Smileless2012 Wed 16-Apr-25 11:01:01

I understand OldFrill do you?

OldFrill Wed 16-Apr-25 10:52:14

Smileless2012

My response was to Cabbie about why this issue has become a talking point OldFrill and it became a talking point long before the Scottish Governments ruling about GRC; legislation that was blocked by Rishi Sunak's government.

Another who has no clue as to what's been going on in Scotland.

Elegran Wed 16-Apr-25 10:48:46

Rosie51

Doodledog

Sex, even grin

And in my excitement I put 'woman' instead of sex grin

A mere slip of the brain. That is nothing - in my post at 09:51:51 I put "woman" instead of "man", which made a pig's ear of the meaning of my whole post.

Elegran Wed 16-Apr-25 10:44:53

At last a definition which distinguishes sex (a biological attribute refering to whether an individual is of the half of a species which produces eggs, or large gametes, or of the half which produces sperm, or small gametes), from gender (a term which covers all the other aspects of the psychological and social difference between the two sexes)

"Gender" has been used so often recently that it has blurred the actual meanings of the words. I presume it was because people felt that even using the word "sex" for biological male/female differences was too close to "talking dirty" about the sex act, and that "gender" was somehow a more respectable name for them.

Grandmabatty Wed 16-Apr-25 10:40:49

Good news.

Rosie51 Wed 16-Apr-25 10:19:50

Doodledog

Sex, even grin

And in my excitement I put 'woman' instead of sex grin

GrannyGravy13 Wed 16-Apr-25 10:16:37

Common sense prevails 👏👏👏

Mollygo Wed 16-Apr-25 10:15:15

Well done the Supreme Court, but crazy that this needed doing!

grumppa Wed 16-Apr-25 10:13:37

Well done the Supreme Court!

Doodledog Wed 16-Apr-25 10:12:13

Sex, even grin

Doodledog Wed 16-Apr-25 10:11:51

The term ‘sec’ has been ruled to mean ‘biological sex’!

Who would have thought it necessary to have a court decide that, but it’s excellent news.

Rosie51 Wed 16-Apr-25 10:10:24

Well done Supreme Court! Woman in the EA means biological sex.

Doodledog Wed 16-Apr-25 10:03:31

We’re back to the playbook again. Far Right is not remotely synonymous with an understanding of biology or a refusal to pretend that men can become women just by saying they are.

Can you outline your understanding of what Right and Left mean, please, PoliticsNerd? When this came up before on here, it became very clear that the poster using the terms was ‘muddled’ in her comprehension. That poster, whichever of her usernames she posted under, also accused anyone who disagreed with her of racism, homophobia and Nazism, and clearly had a tentative grasp of what those terms meant, too.

Mollygo Wed 16-Apr-25 09:55:48

Smileless2012

Do you know why this issue has become a talking point Cabbie and why up until recently it has never been an issue, not just for you and your friend but for transgenders in general?

It's because women weren't being subjected to men claiming to be women while displaying their genitalia in women's changing rooms. It's because lesbian speed dating meetings hadn't previously had trans women insisting that they be allowed to attend. It's because women fighting for the retention of safe spaces for women, weren't being threatened and intimidated by trans activists. It's because never before had a rapist, now claiming to be a trans woman been referred too by his defence counsel and the presiding judge as she (Lexi Secker).

None of the aforementioned relate to your friend or to the over whelming majority of those who live as their preferred gender, but this has and continues to happen and it has to stop.

Well put Smileless2012

It’s also time for the blame for this to be placed firmly on the men who have caused the problems, both for females and for all those I wouldn’t have known or living unnoticed TW.
Instead of which, the blame is hurled against females, by males and those who support male rights over female rights.

Elegran Wed 16-Apr-25 09:51:51

Madgran77

*I would add that it could be really dangerous for a man with a medical problem to keep insisting on presenting himself as a woman to medical staff.*

This is a really key point in terms of medical treatment and safety.

I seem to remember there was a case where a transman presented as a woman at A & E with severe abdominal pain without mentioning their birth sex, and indeed denying it when asked, which considerably hindered the diagnosis and treatment of an ectopic pregnancy.

Smileless2012 Wed 16-Apr-25 09:50:55

My response was to Cabbie about why this issue has become a talking point OldFrill and it became a talking point long before the Scottish Governments ruling about GRC; legislation that was blocked by Rishi Sunak's government.